Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$9.80
per month per user
Pricing
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$9.8
per month per user
Wrike Business
$24.8
per month per user
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
Wrike has better customization and integrations Flexibility to give different access depending on what it is needed. Spaces provide independence for each Team to set up what they need Open to feedback from users and implementing changes suggested by users Learning material …
Verified User
Project Manager
Chose Wrike
I have not used any other project management software in this capacity.
Verified User
Director
Chose Wrike
Wrike offered good ease of use while also providing top-tier Gantt chart
management. Wrike stood out with the design of their form submission, which enables conditional branching with custom fields and organization. Wrike also proved easier to create and manage tasks across …
What Wrike does better than all of the above is to provide a tool that can handle both Waterfall and Kanban. Usually tools lean one way or the other, or they do one well and the other is terrible. Wrike seems a bit more agnostic and allows you to design how you want to manage …
Verified User
Project Manager
Chose Wrike
I find Jira very square and hard to customize. Wrike is totally the opposite, you can personalize almost everything and the support team is always very responsive in case of doubts. Also, as far as, I know you can't invite collaborator easily in Jira.
ActiveCollab - the version from around 2013 was great. My current employer tested a newer version of ActiveCollab but it didn't give us the functions the old AC had. In the end we opted for Wrike.
Teams Planner (Microsoft) - we started to use this 6 months ago to get an overview …
Wrike differentiates because it allows us to share files and different versions of our projects. We can all see the latest update on a project and discuss our thoughts about it. It is a project management tool. However, the other software is more of a design and communication …
I think the ease of use and cross collaboration is really useful here against other platforms. Also one of the biggest differences is actually really helpful how the app stores files and images which makes them useful to look for previous images (especially when you upload a …
We had only evaluated Monday and Asana on a surface level before we chose Wrike, so never went to try a trial, but from what we saw in terms of functionality and customizability they both didn't seem to match up with our varied needs as a very diverse company dealing with …
Wrike offers a lot more features and functionalities compared to the tools we've used previously. The approval process, UI, and integrations available make it a no-brainer. It makes collaboration between remote teams extremely convenient. The experience has been great and after …
Is kinda different but of course it will stack up because the other tools has no the función ability to integrate the task management features even tho they could, however Wrike does it very good and user friendly. Actually if Wrike decides to get into crm they could have a …
I've used Microsoft Project to manage waterfall projects and Jira to manage agile projects. Compared to Wrike, Project has more features for waterfall management, but can be complicated to use. Wrike seems to have all the functionality of Jira with all the added features needed …
Wrike, as an organizational tool, provides way more functionalities and better registration of data, for example, with artificial intelligence tools that help you complete or look for specific tasks. When I started in the company, we used Trello as our organization tool, and …
Wrike is a great tool across all stages of work. What sets it apart from other platforms is how well it caters to the needs of all types of teams and departments. Being a broader system, it doesn't specialize in any specific area (e.g., finance or design), making it a universal …
We are combining them. Jira primarily targeted at software development teams and IT projects. Also for more advanced issue tracking and customization capabilities. Jira offers more customization options, including custom workflows and issue types, but we don't need that for …
Ultimately, we've decided to move our operations over to Jira. The initial choice of Wrike was driven by the management of the Marketing division; however, I had reservations about this decision from the start. Jira's capabilities seem to align more closely with our needs, …
Wrike is better suited for big organizations, and it feels more organized and serious than Trello. To me, Trello devolves into a bunch of Kanban boards and it's hard to get a bird's eye view of everything going on. Wrike is much better at organizing things and letting you …
My organization used Google Sheets to work with subbies, but we've since switched to Wrike. It is user friendly, has formulas and customizable fields. Wrike has been a lifesaver because instead of sharing Google Sheets with external customers and typically they messing up - deleting formulas, users can simply fill out a request form without logging into Wrike . All details are displayed in a table view, making management much easier.
The email notifications that are automatically sent from Wrike when something is done are easy for users to miss or ignore.
Reporting can be limited. You have to create workarounds for collecting/storing the name of the person submitting the form in instances where they do not have their own Wrike license.
A more user-friendly interface, especially for those less familiar with project management software, would enhance overall accessibility.
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Wrike, overall, is pretty easy to setup and use. I still find challenges in changing milestone dates but our programs / date changes are different than industry standard so that is partly the issue. We love the Excel look along with the dashboards! There are also built in analytics that really assist in seeing where the projects are!
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Support is very quickly and they want to solve problems actively. When I need additional info I can use community forum, when I've an issue I can use support form to get help. The support is of excellent quality from the first level, to grow when you talk to the engineers it becomes even more important
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
I have not used other products except Microsoft Teams channels with file sharing and standard sharing from Adobe, text and email messaging, and Zoom/gotomeeting sharing. This is the first product that I have used that had the functionality and platform where the sharing is simplistic. It is better than standard sharing through email or other simple forms because everything stays together.
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Adding versions of a document streamlines our editing process, preventing us from reviewing outdated versions of a document. This feature saves time, especially when working with external contributors who may not know Wrike well.
Blueprints save time because we do not have to manually enter all the details when scheduling a recurring project.
