Wrike review.
Overall Satisfaction with Wrike
We use Wrike as our centralized project management and workflow platform to track payer contracting negotiations from initiation through execution. Contracting involves multiple stakeholders, including legal, finance, operations, provider leadership, and payer representatives. Wrike helps us coordinate these activities in a structured, transparent way.
Pros
- Task list based on Due dates.
- Mentioning to loop in the appropriate people for the task.
- Availability to attach pertinent documents.
Cons
- More interoperability with other programs, ie. Salesforce.
- Different teams (e.g., contracting, compliance, provider relations) can view updates in real time, comment directly on tasks, and escalate items when needed.
- Wrike allows us to template the contracting process (from intake to signature) to ensure consistency across payers and reduce administrative overhead.
- Leadership can see the status of negotiations at a glance, identify bottlenecks, and prioritize resources accordingly.
We have automations built into our approval process within tasks; this has helped maintain the status of negotiations effectively without adding additional steps for the contract manager.
Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?
Yes
Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Wrike again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation