ShadowProtect, from Arcserve company StorageCraft (merged in March of 2021), supports business continuity with data backup and system protection; the vendor boasts fast system restore capabilities relative to other similar solutions.
N/A
Zerto
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Zerto, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, aims to enable customers to run an always-on business by simplifying the protection,
recovery, and mobility of on-premises and cloud applications. Zerto’s cloud
data management and protection platform is designed to eliminate the risks and complexity of
modernization and cloud adoption across private, public, and hybrid
deployments. The software-only platform uses continuous data protection
at scale to converge disaster recovery, backup, and data…
N/A
Pricing
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Zerto
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Zerto
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Zerto
Features
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Zerto
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Arcserve ShadowProtect
7.4
1 Ratings
9% below category average
Zerto
8.3
3 Ratings
2% above category average
Universal recovery
8.01 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Instant recovery
8.01 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Recovery verification
7.01 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
Business application protection
9.01 Ratings
8.73 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations
8.01 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Incremental backup identification
8.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Backup to the cloud
5.01 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression
6.01 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Snapshots
6.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Flexible deployment
7.01 Ratings
8.73 Ratings
Management dashboard
7.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Platform support
8.01 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Retention options
9.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Encryption
8.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Arcserve ShadowProtect
8.0
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Zerto
8.3
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Continuous data protection
9.01 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Replication
7.01 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Malware protection
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Disaster Recovery
Comparison of Disaster Recovery features of Product A and Product B
In situations where business continuity needs are high, ShadowProtect backups provide the ability to keep operations running with very minimal downtime, even in situations like crypto-locked data. If a backup server is set up in an environment to resume a live server from backup, this is even more helpful. In situations where clients don't care as much about quickly recovering their data, they can go without a solution like this.
Zerto is well suited for disaster recovery and virtual machine replication between multiple data centers. DR testing for audit or regulations is much easier with Zerto, great reporting, dashboard etc. It is not well suited for physical server replication for disaster recovery or as a primary backup solution.
Anyone with a large disk (VMDK) knows the issues of VMware snapshots. Most backup software is a "point in time backup" that uses snapshots. While the backup can be run multiple times per day the stress of the snapshot on the host and storage is eliminated by the continuous protection of Zerto log replication.
A client had a the disks on a VM go missing for some reason. We had them "flip the switch" for a real fail over and press the fail over button. The VM on our DR site started to come alive as the VM at the customer site was brought down. When the DR VM was fully up, automatic reverse replication started. The DR machine was available in a few minutes (to take into account different host hardware) for access. One the vm at both sites were in sync, we had the customer again repeat the fail over process and the DR site VM was turned off and the Production site VM was brought back on line. This was a 200 GB VM and the whole process was finished in about 3 hours.
Zerto also allows for "Test" fail overs that can be configured on many different functions, such as host, datastore, network and IP usage. Configuring the IPs is crucial to avoid inadvertent site cross contamination of the same VM.
Zerto can also retrieve files from any VM disk on the DR site without starting a VM. Very handy for retrieving files or directories.
Since Zerto is running continuous log replication, changes on the production VM are nearly instantaneously copied to the DR site. As with any data process, having sufficient bandwidth for "churn" peaks minimizes the delay in updating the DR site.
We really like the easy setup of this replication solution, as well as the ease of management. Not to mention, our internal IT Economist determined that the Zerto solution would provide the best ROI out of the competing solutions we analyzed. So far, his calculations have been spot on, and we have saved substantially
Zerto is very easy to implement and support. Uses are broad, only issues are once something doesn't sync it is difficult to get assistance until your reach tier 2 or tier 3 support. Basic file and folder recovery is great. Live and test fail overs are also easy to implement without issue.
We don’t need support often, but when we do, the support has been strong. Sometimes it is hard to determine how to access support for the exact issue we are having. There are a decent forum and online ticketing system. Support for the cloud center seems to be provided only by phone, though.
Overall support is very good. We sometimes get pushback when asking Level 1 support to escalate to Level 2. This causes undue frustrations when you need a more knowledgeable support person to get involved. We've had to escalate to account reps a few times for this scenario. Zerto is very responsive and normally handles our requests very quickly.
We started out using Backup Exec which was in service until we virtualized our environment where it didn't perform as well at the time. Then we switched to Veeam which worked well, but then as we started needing to do migrations and off-site DR, we found ourselves relying on Zerto more often.
For my organization, the pricing model was an upfront investment for the Zerto licenses. My organization prefers to pay upfront and not deal with month-to-month or year-to-year pricing models that most companies are moving to. But for some, the investment may be more than they can afford, and would prefer the year-to-year pricing model.
I mean, it was 6 years ago, but we were up and going with all applications synchronizing in short order. The longest tasks was getting the 30 TB of application data synchronized between the datacenters.
We have been with Shadowprotect for 5 years and are now only moving off of them due to limited functionality and Shadowprotect doubling our billing.
The product now requires a lot more babysitting so I have one person just stuck managing backups, which is not a fulfilling job and hard to keep someone in that seat.
While Shadowprotect has been fantastic for years, it is time for us to move on to something that makes financial sense and requires less labour.
Storagecraft Cloud is fairly expensive compared to competitors.
Zerto is like having the best possible insurance ... it just works, and often provides the backups taken overnight that are key in recovering data/work between overnight backups.
Zerto easily enabled the move of primary datacenters by allowing easy failover to a secondary site, and failback to the primary site.