Brassring vs. Snagajob (Snag)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Brassring
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.N/A
Snagajob
Score 6.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Snagajob, or Snag (including technology from PeopleMatter acquired June 2016) is a recruiting and job posting marketplace and platform, designed to fit the specific needs of service-industry brands. Users can find applicants, hire employees, train workers, schedule teams, and evaluate performance using the Snag / Snagajob platform.N/A
Pricing
BrassringSnagajob (Snag)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BrassringSnagajob
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsPeopleMatter is priced per location per month. The pricing is consistent for predictable budgeting and planning – as customers add additional locations, fees increase.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BrassringSnagajob (Snag)
Considered Both Products
Brassring
Chose Brassring
The primary reason of still going with Kenexa is because we have been using it for quite some time now. And considering it is used by more than 30 countries, it makes the training and communication about Kenexa easy. Also purchasing this license for a longer period (3, 5 years) …
Chose Brassring
It stacks up well against Bullhorn CRM for candidate retrieval but not as streamlined or automated.
Chose Brassring
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated.
Chose Brassring
We recently started using Assess for our Food Service and Area Managers and the results have not been as accurate as Kenexa. We have since made some bad hires off the results of Assess, we have had one particular Area Manager that scored in the "Best" category and her behavior …
Chose Brassring
Kenexa fares very poorly in practice against almost anything else. It checks the boxes of raw functionality, and offers wide customization. However, in practice it is a nightmare to use for almost everything. I was not part of the initial implementation, so I am not aware of …
Chose Brassring
Kenekxa removes the CV's after 90 days even when the recruitment process for the position is still in progress so you basically have have a situations where the CV put up by a consultant is automatically removed without any information to Client or Consultant and that candidate …
Chose Brassring
I did not have much to do with the selection process, but I found out that OpenHire was in the running, which is the worst system I have ever worked with. I was able to share my OpenHire experience, and hopefully that assisted with the selection of Kenexa. Compared to other …
Chose Brassring
We used Kenexa due to its price. But the ultimate thing that we learned in the end is that: you get what you pay for.
It wasn't so awful that we wanted to just do physical recruiting, but then again it wasn't good enough to where we were happy with our results.
Bullhorn is …
Chose Brassring
Kenexa allowed for the requisition process to automated where as Ceridian's version I worked on did not. Also the Kenexa version allows multiple copies of an applications where the Ceridian version I previously used did not and made affirmative action harder to comply with.
Chose Brassring
I have used PeopleSoft eRecruit which was horrible and didn't give the recruiters the ability to source for candidates inside the system. We just implemented Workday Recruit in the last month and it has many functionality deficincies right now but it is a new product and they …
Chose Brassring
JobDiva, Maxhire. Kenexa is a much cleaner interface than the other two - appears to be a standard system across organizations.
Chose Brassring
I didn't! However, I have used both SmartSearch and SilkRoad OpenHire extensively. SmartSearch is fantastic for recruiter geeks who really want to find out all the neat things that are available. It's fast, super easy to use, and quite elegant in design. Probably not a good …
Snagajob
Chose Snagajob
I've no evidence at this point to rate Snagajob (Snag) in relation to other such services. I do suppose it's a better experience than a previously mentioned competitor.
Chose Snagajob
Indeed has a much wider user base, but that can often mean more unqualified applicants however, sometimes more applicants is what we need
Chose Snagajob
I have not used any other products like Snagajob.
Chose Snagajob
I have used Indeed and Proven for hiring. Indeed is great, but Proven was more for corporate staff. I like Snag because it was developed for part to full-time service industry jobs. It has more people there for my company, where, with others, there are more professional or …
Chose Snagajob
PeopleMatter was selected primarily to support the store environment, and it does an excellent job in that space. It was chosen over other vendors for its easy to use, intuitive interface that really meets the needs of the manager in a retail store. The system helps managers …
Chose Snagajob
PeopleMatter is a HUGE step up from paper applications. The applicant pool is larger, diversified and more qualified to fill our open positions.
Chose Snagajob
Honestly, the number one reason I choose PeopleMatter was the look and feel of the system. I needed something that was not intimidating to use. My restaurant managers do not have time to try and figure out how to use complicated systems. PeopleMatter had a familiar face to it, …
Chose Snagajob
Seriously, it's the onboarding that sets PeopleMatter apart from the rest. Every payroll company I have ever met with always says their service can work for what we need and replace PeopleMatter. However, they never can link our applications to their site, provide a way to …
Chose Snagajob
Previoulsy, we did everything in house before so PeopleMatter has been a time saver. I use to spend days just checking paperwork to make sure it was complete and then to verify applicants was a nightmare. PeopleMatter has simplified all of that and completely changed my work …
Chose Snagajob
PeopleMatter is straight forward and easy to use - from the administrative side it is virtually an out of the box process. You plug in your locations, jobs, and availabilities, know your Onboarding steps, add a link to your website an go! It's not perfect but this was our first …
Features
BrassringSnagajob (Snag)
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
7.5
Ratings
5% below category average
Snagajob (Snag)
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Company Website Posting7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Customized Application Form7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Resume Management7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Candidate Search8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Templates7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
User Permissions7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BrassringSnagajob (Snag)
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
LinkedIn Talent Solutions
LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BrassringSnagajob (Snag)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.8
(0 ratings)
4.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
2.6
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BrassringSnagajob (Snag)
Likelihood to Recommend
Other products in the same category as Kenexa 2x BrassRing would be Taleo and PeopleFluent. I would also look into Avature as an ATS option. I am currently on the sourcing side of the recruitment process and use Avature for tracking and candidate mining purposes. I would recommend getting any kind of demo possible since the user interfaces vary quite a bit between them. Ease of use and overall stability should be kept in mind when comparing ATS prices.
Read full review
Peoplematter is a great solution for companies who want to save time and money on the onboarding process. It is a very simple solution that will really aid your managers and HR with their daily duties. It provides relief by ensuring the W4 and I9 are filled out accurately, plus additional onboarding items. It integrates with job boards making posting jobs a breeze. It has great reporting functions to help track where your new hires are coming from, turnover, assessments scores, etc. Honestly, I feel PeopleMatter's Price Point makes this product valuable to any size company or business
Read full review
Pros
  • Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
  • Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
  • Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
Read full review
  • The assessments in the Hire module allow managers and supervisors to choose from applicants who are suited for our line of work.
  • The onboarding process allows our company to avoid costly printing of hiring packets.
  • The Learn module allows us to reach all of our associates with the same material at one time, which allows consistency throughout our stores.
Read full review
Cons
  • Setting up integrations is extremely tedious. For instance, setting up an address feed would have required sending over 5 different spreadsheets on a daily basis (one each for every facility name, street address, zip code, state, country) and a 6th sheet to make the connection between the other 5 elements. We opted not to set up that integration as a result.
Read full review
  • Messaging candidates options are limited. There are pre-written questions if you want to use them, but I cannot change them or figure out how to change them.
  • To schedule an interview I only have 140 characters to leave a note to the candidate.
  • The "My Team" features are not useful to my company at all.
  • There used to be a search candidate function, but it was limited. It has been removed from the site.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
Read full review
I would definitely renew our use of PeopleMatter, because it would not be beneficial or cost effective for us to go back to doing it in house. If they are willing to listen to our needs and wants and update the program for the better on a regular basis why would you. I feel like we got in on the ground floor and we are evolving with them
Read full review
Usability
There is nothing that a recruiter needs to do that they can't do with Kenexa 2XB but the proprietary, old fashioned UI is far from intuitive to use. I only rate 2XB this highly because the SaaS is up most of the time, performance is usually reasonable, and it does actually work.
Read full review
It's a cleanly designed and easy to use website.
Read full review
Performance
Just slow for what we are doing here
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
Read full review
The account reps were easily reachable. I have made different types of recommendation, especially about the communication part. There are videos and a help center with fairly quick response times. I can easily update my career site, and they even have a text to hire option. I have not used that yet, but we are discussing it.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
We purchased an out of the box solution and that worked well for us.
Read full review
I would just say make sure you really think about how you are setting up the product. Are you using the roles correctly? Can we automate any processes
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The primary reason of still going with Kenexa is because we have been using it for quite some time now. And considering it is used by more than 30 countries, it makes the training and communication about Kenexa easy. Also purchasing this license for a longer period (3, 5 years) makes it very cost effective as well.
Read full review
PeopleMatter was selected primarily to support the store environment, and it does an excellent job in that space. It was chosen over other vendors for its easy to use, intuitive interface that really meets the needs of the manager in a retail store. The system helps managers select the best talent that has completed a validated assessment, improving the quality of talent in our stores.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Kenexa has assisted us in identifying top talent within our target market of applicants.
  • Kenexa may exclude potentially good associates that don't test well.
  • Kenexa clearly defines specific categories and general notes for training, development, & coaching of associates on areas of opportunity.
Read full review
  • The ROI on using PeopleMatter is amazing when I consider the amount of paper saved, time saved, and not to mention the fact that using these services prevented our company from having to hire an assistant to help take care of the large amounts of paper work that come through our office.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Snagajob Screenshots

Screenshot of Online Job ApplicationScreenshot of Six-Minute AssessmentScreenshot of Applicant Tracking and FilteringScreenshot of Training Course SetupScreenshot of Managing the ScheduleScreenshot of