Likelihood to Recommend SAP SQL Anywhere is better than not using a database, let's be clear there! However, I wouldn't pick it as my first or even second or third choice. I'd recommend looking at other options. Largely, it appears less powerful both in terms of its robustness and general performance and in its implementation of SQL. The standard Sybase utilities provided are lacking in basic features, and the interactive SQL utility is quite horrendous. However, the great thing is it is an ODBC-compliant SQL-compliant relational database.
Read full review Teamdesk is perfect for any operational tracking requirements for companies small or large, and any situation where you need to integrate with other systems since it can be set up to do that flexibly via its API and Webhooks. For example, you could track contacts, time and expense, projects and tasks, schedules, web leads, check-ins, order entry, quotes and invoices, support ticketing, and use the more advanced features to integrate with other systems to pull in currency exchange rates, various lists of data from other databases, send faxes, send bulk emails and so on. It does not do offline storage, so it would not be appropriate for a situation that offline work.
Read full review Pros Good performance with relatively large data sets - its cost-based query optimizer is particularly robust ANSI SQL compliant Supports T-SQL Scales well between the desktop (single user) and client/server installations supporting 50-1000 users Read full review Provide a very good, customizable user management system. Gives a lot of flexibility to customize database to your needs without requiring coding skills. Even allows to customize interface if you can code in html. Provides unlimited space and records. Gives an opportunity to have a database on EU servers to comply with GDPR Offers very good pricing options comparing to competitors (Salesforce, Quickbase, etc.) and offers unlimited space. Gives an opportunity to share your ideas how to improve the platform, many of which are being implemented Customers service if very helpful and friendly. All my questions were answered within a couple hours. Read full review Cons I think it should be more user friendly for non-technical users. More functional functionalities should be added to the object explore when working with a table to transform data/manipulate data. Nosa W.I Sr. SAP SD Project Lead / Consultant /
Read full review The only down side that I see, is that you have to be willing to spend some time creating your database. You start with a blank canvas and all the tools you need to design a custom database. But, you have to take the time to do it. If you take that time, it is well worth it. Read full review Likelihood to Renew Ease of use, relationship to existing software's used in house and familiarity with the product
Read full review Support Rating They are simply amazing. Very fast, like I have a personal support person standing by for me and always solves my problem in one go.
Read full review Alternatives Considered I worked with Oracle for years during my career. I wouldn't select SQL Anywhere to implement a global ATM system with tens of thousands of concurrent connections, but SQL Anywhere is much easier to use and deploy and works very well in workgroup settings. Query performance often exceeds some Oracle versions without having to rely on database tuning.
Read full review Quickbase is a good product which I have been using for 5 years (powerful, nice interface) but - not so powerful as TeamDesk - started to move toward large companies (>50 people) - more expensive than TeamDesk Zoho was not as flexible as TeamDesk
Caspio was not as powerful as TeamDesk
Read full review Return on Investment Skilled/experienced resources are less prominent than Microsoft SQL Server or even Oracle, or MySQL, so finding solutions and assistance, if needed, takes more time than it would with other platforms You will need to find a good SQL query tool by yourself because the Sybase Central / Interactive SQL utilities are lacking in many basic features, and just generally have a bad user interface Read full review The per user cost is significantly lower than any prior option we have tried. The time spent getting things set up was time well spent for the overall long-term savings. Read full review ScreenShots