Swif vs. TeamViewer
Swif vs. TeamViewer
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Swif | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Swif, a YC company, is presented as a one-stop AI-powered device management platform for over 100 teams. According to the vendor, teams like UnitX, Symbl.ai, can use Swif to save over $100K and 600 hours annually on managing and securing employee devices, onboarding, and offboarding employees, and gain assurance their teams meet compliance with Swif. | N/A | |
TeamViewer | N/A | TeamViewer provides software for both remote management and online collaborations. With TeamViewer, users have access to fully integrated online conference solutions for audio and video communication, including interactive screen sharing and remote access features. | $299 per year |
| Swif | TeamViewer | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Swif | TeamViewer |
|---|
| Swif | TeamViewer | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Remote Administration |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Platform & Infrastructure |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Remote Access |
|
| Swif | TeamViewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Avast CloudCare Score 10.0 out of 10 | Getscreen.me Score 9.6 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | KACE Systems Management Appliance Score 8.3 out of 10 | Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | KACE Systems Management Appliance Score 8.3 out of 10 | Remote Desktop Manager Score 9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Swif | TeamViewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.7 (558 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (64 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (57 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (5 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (5 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.7 (50 ratings) |
| In-Person Training | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Online Training | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.9 (119 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (5 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (5 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 8.5 (5 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (5 ratings) |
| Swif | TeamViewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Pros | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Cons | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Likelihood to Renew | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Usability | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Reliability and Availability | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Performance | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Support Rating | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| In-Person Training | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Online Training | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Implementation Rating | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Alternatives Considered | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Scalability | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| Return on Investment | Swif.ai No answers on this topic | ![]() TeamViewer
|
| ScreenShots | Swif Screenshots | TeamViewer Screenshots |












