Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs. Windows Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Score 8.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 is a BaaS (Backup as a Service) solution used to back up and restore Microsoft 365 data, including Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive for Business and Microsoft Teams data.N/A
Windows Server
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365Windows Server
Editions & Modules
VDC for Microsoft 365
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365Windows Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365Windows Server
Considered Both Products
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Fortify by OpenText
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Rubrik, AvePoint Confidence Platform, NetBackup from Cohesity and Commvault Clumio
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Cloudflare AI Gateway
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
It’s a wonderful product.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Recommended for price, ease of use, and available features.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Really, a better product overall.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Veeam Backup for AWS
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Rubrik
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
I liked that this was VEEAM based, one throat to choke if anything goes wrong.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
We demoed several backup solutions when we were scouting for an option, Veeam Data Cloud was by far the easiest to setup and implement, which was critical for a small team supporting over 5 different companies.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
First and foremost, Veeam's reputation stood out. They have been a leader in the backup vendors for a few years. That reputation along with recommendations from colleagues sold us on Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365. The other vendors that we did demo's with were lacluster in …
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
The usability of Veeam Data Cloud surpasses that of the aforementioned applications, in addition to being highly accessible in terms of its licensing model.

La usabilidad de Veean Data Cloud está por arriba de las aplicaciones mencionadas, adicional a que es muy accesible en …
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Love all the Veeam Products and have been a loyal customer for years.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
The unlimited storage pricing.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
We liked how simple Veeam Data Cloud for M365 was to manage and maintain versus the other products we evaluated.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 is simpler to use then each alternative I've tried. Besides Synology, it's also the most cost effective. I also appreciate Veeam includes pricing on their website so I don't have to fill out a form or call someone. I don't like having to wait …
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 is a comprehensive backup solution and it fits perfectly with our needs.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
We choose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 because of my previous experience with them and the simplicity of use.
Chose Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
Not tested yet! We bought for our new data center and we will start to use in may 2026
Windows Server
Chose Windows Server
I find Microsoft Windows Server is a much easier OS to deploy and administer. It does require more resources to run, requires more security updates and overall has a larger footprint. Rebooting the Windows Server takes a much longer time than RHEL for example. An administration …
Chose Windows Server
Windows Server blows any of the Linux flavors I've used out of the water. Even after gaining experience with Linux, I'm able to achieve the same results in Windows Server from a command line much quicker than in Linux simply because Windows Server, especially with the …
Chose Windows Server
Familiar interface thus easy to adopt. Licensing costs are better than other commercial virtualization vendors at least for our hardware/needs.
Chose Windows Server
Windows Server is much easier to work with and it's widely adopted. It have a lot of features and a nice gui.
In the other hand linux systems are more robust and often more secure , but the learning curve and technician needed for it are much higher. Depend on the usage you got …
Chose Windows Server
They are different experiences, and while the other solutions offer enterprise-grade stability and, in some cases, address Windows server shortcomings (such as patching), they all do the trick, but the other solutions require a deeper technical background/configuration of items …
Chose Windows Server
More user friendly and Graphical user interface is extreme compared to linux
Chose Windows Server
It is really all about application support. The only option we really have is Windows Server, and where we can choose we continue to use it for consistency as well as compatibility with the systems where we are forced to use Windows Server).
Chose Windows Server
We've utilized docker and debian for very specific applications and they have been useful - overall Windows Server provides a better package. I would choose VMware ESXi over Windows Server for virtualization as it's far more reliable in our experience. I can't imagine using a …
Chose Windows Server
There are plenty of other server solutions out there which may be better suited for certain tasks, but Windows Server is the way to get a Windows environment going. For simple setups, there are many alternatives, but often there are key features lacking, or a restriction on …
Chose Windows Server
Windows Server is more cost-effective and skills are easier to find to support the products. The deployment and management of the product can be automated with Microsoft SCCM. In my opinion, Linux seems to be more secured but takes more time and effort to learn than Windows …
Chose Windows Server
These are just very different products. They can all have the same functionality but the specific product knowledge with Linux is much higher. This slows down troubleshooting and can leave you with limited options for high end support. There are absolutely good use cases for …
Chose Windows Server
We have been using Microsoft products for the last 15+ years and following are key point for choosing this solution:
  • Trust & reliability of products.
  • Customer support.
Chose Windows Server
I didn't use any other system which gives the same functionality and I am not aware of any. The full integration between all components and especially the ability to integrate mail via Exchange or even via a hybrid setup with the Ofice365 cloud, including the ability to …
Chose Windows Server
For our more experienced users and for simple web apps we will go the RHEL route but with Windows Server such an industry standard the the ease of use of the GUI it just makes more sense for most applications that use it. It also generally has a lot more interoperability …
Chose Windows Server
Linux is great, but support is harder to come by. You also need to pay linux admins more as it is a much smaller group of people that can support it. Windows is the industry standard with the most support available. Going with another platform just didn't seem to make sense …
Chose Windows Server
I have some basic experience using various builds of Linux and have always found myself coming back to Windows. Perhaps after years of working with Microsoft products they all have a similar feel and configuration options. Microsoft products are my typical first choice where …
Chose Windows Server
We have various servers or appliances that run on various flavors of Linux that do their jobs well, but we configure and manage them very lightly at the OS level. Most of the admin on these devices is sone inside the applications themselves. We don't shy away from new …
Chose Windows Server
All the other products I have used in the past OS2 servers, Novell Netware, Banyan Vines etc don't show up in the search list, which i guess goes to show that the best wins.
Chose Windows Server
I have used/administered several servers using systems like Ubuntu, Debian, and CentOS. While these systems are great in their own rights, you are typically using a command-line interface or shell in order to administrate the system. This requires a lot of commands to be …
Chose Windows Server
For our purposes it came down to picking between Windows and Linux and at the end of the day we picked both. We use Windows for 80% of our server needs to run our Web, File, Print, DHCP, Internal DNS, Active Directory, SQL, Web and other windows based servers. We use linux …
Chose Windows Server
Windows Server has become one of the industry standards for providing file and directory services for the majority of users because of the ease with which it interacts with the common desktop OS, as opposed to needing to provide esoteric support for users to be able to work …
Chose Windows Server
About any linux distro can be setup to handle services that a Windows Server can do, except I have not personally found anything nearly as convenient of a replacement for Active Directory, Group Policy, or an RD Gateway. There are alternatives to those services, they just …
Chose Windows Server
Windows Server is by far the easiest server option to get started with because they offer the same kind of interface with windows that most users are already familiar with. Plus, it's the most graphically friendly option, so it is easy to navigate. Lastly, it is the most …
Features
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365Windows Server
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
8.6
Ratings
0% above category average
Windows Server
-
Ratings
Management dashboard8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
7.8
Ratings
2% below category average
Windows Server
-
Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware protection7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
SaaS Backup
Comparison of SaaS Backup features of Product A and Product B
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
8.4
Ratings
2% below category average
Windows Server
-
Ratings
SaaS Product Integration9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Data Restoration Options8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Auditing and Search7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Storage in the Cloud or On-Premises8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating System
Comparison of Operating System features of Product A and Product B
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
-
Ratings
Windows Server
7.8
Ratings
9% below category average
File Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Software Application Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
System Update Frequency00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Operating System Security00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365Windows Server
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365Windows Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365Windows Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Analyzing campaign performance is a great area where the Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 is well-suited, and it’s working well. In the past, when we analyzed campaign performance, we had to use outside vendors, which was a time-consuming, laborious, and costly process.
Read full review
Anytime I need a server for something, whether to test a new platform or app, devote a server to hosting something, etc., Windows Server is my go-to choice. Recently I needed a new server to host a web server and web application, so I spun up a Windows Server 2025 VM and was up and running in no time at all.
Read full review
Pros
  • Granular restoration of emails within a mailbox
  • Complete Restoration of a Mailbox
  • Restoration of Teams Conversations
  • Add users for backups
  • Restauración granular de correos electrónicos dentro de un buzón
  • Restauración completa de un buzón
  • Restauración de conversaciones de TEAMS
  • Agregar usuarios para respaldos
Read full review
  • Backup of workstations & itself - reliably, consistently, with Bare-Metal Restore and deduplication
  • File management and Security on a per file/folder/user basis is simple and fully done through an easy GUI
  • DNS, DHCP server functions are easy to configure using the built-in GUI
Read full review
Cons
  • I would like the option to remove users from the backup and set them to an alternate storage location/ archive location. Currently, my backups are at 7 TB, and I would like to segment out data with lower data retention requirements.
Read full review
  • Microsoft needs to minimize the update frequency by making the product more secure. It can become very exhausting trying to keep updated if you don't have a dedicated support team. It can become challenging where the business is unable to allow downtime for reboots as part of the update process.
  • Prone to security and audit vulnerabilities.
  • The operating system needs more CPU and memory resources compared to other options such as Linux.
  • Understanding the licensing model can be abit confusing.
  • Comes with a standard firewall, but not the most secured one available. Would suggest using a more secured firewall as part of your antivirus software.
  • Due to the number of vulnerabilities and the operating system being a target for hackers, anti-virus software is a must.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 just works so well and is so easy to use. I researched multiple options for Office 365 backup and none seemed to be as easy to setup and use as Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 and the pricing was very comfortable to us. I can't imagine any reason why we would change away from Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365.
Read full review
I've carefully reviewed the servers and services currently running on Windows Server 2012, and given the opportunity would renew them as is going forward. There are two systems I currently have in place, one is a very large Linux implementation for a large ecommerce site, and one is a very large backup solution front ended by FTP servers running Linux. Neither are well suited for Windows, but the overall network infrastructure is and will be Windows Server for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Usability
The interface is simple, but powerful. It's easy to setup, easy to use. It's able to restore individual files and emails with ease. Would like to see the wording on some features cleared up, as it's caused us some confusing learning the tool.
Read full review
There are simply too many different parts of Windows Server to make it a cohesive piece of software. While some of the newer features found in Windows Server 2012 and 2016 have nice UIs that are logically laid out, there are enough parts of the system that is still based on old code with clunky UIs and confusing options to make Windows Server a particularly user-friendly experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I have yet to need it during any of their scheduled maintenance windows. It's always online.
Read full review
some times server hungs and user sessions were busy to connect
Read full review
Performance
We have a lot of data, and pulling backups out of the store sometimes takes a bit of time - but this is within acceptable tolerances. I don't expect restores to be instantaneous, and I can't quantify if the speed is software or data repository.
Read full review
need to improve the performance more
Read full review
Support Rating
The setup support we received was extremely helpful. They allowed us to learn as they created the policies and managed the handoff between setup and guided setup very well. This resulted in active, usable policies and us having the knowledge to adapt these as our needs change in the future.
Read full review
Microsoft's support is hugely wide-ranging from articles online to having to contact them directly for the more serious issues. In recent years when I have contacted them directly, I have found the support o be excellent as I have found myself connected to very knowledgeable people in the field in which I needed the support. The online support available is vast and I tend to find most of the time that there is always someone out there who has had the same issue as me in the past and knows something about how to resolve it! This is the advantage of using industry standard and long-established systems such as Windows Server.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
it was my senior who trained Windows Server features and i was satisfied
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
it was recorded session and useful
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Would have marked a 10 but the storage in AWS was very complicated. Would be nice to have more help/guidance connecting to external storage.
Read full review
Make sure that you have detailed processes in place for every server instance you plan to install/upgrade, if possible get the base OS loaded and Windows Updates applied ahead of time, and if using a VM take a snapshot prior to installing each role, as well as along the way.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
First and foremost, Veeam's reputation stood out. They have been a leader in the backup vendors for a few years. That reputation along with recommendations from colleagues sold us on Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365. The other vendors that we did demo's with were lacluster in setup and performance. Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 immediately won us over.
Read full review
I find Microsoft Windows Server is a much easier OS to deploy and administer. It does require more resources to run, requires more security updates and overall has a larger footprint. Rebooting the Windows Server takes a much longer time than RHEL for example. An administration task such as expanding a drive in Windows can be very simple, however in RHEL it is not.
Read full review
Scalability
I have had no issues scaling this software as my organisation or data estate has grown. It always does exaclty what it says on the box.
Read full review
yes i completely agree multi deployment
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The only real impact is from a compliance standpoint. Our company is expected at a regulatory level to be protecting our data and even though the tenant has little traffic there could still be some regulated data in there. We have to be able to tell an auditor that it's being backed up by an enterprise grade solution, and that's what VDC was intended for.
Read full review
  • Support for a wide range of applications (compatibility) This is especially valuable.
  • The cost of licensing is significantly higher than that of many competing solutions, which means the justification has to be more complete.
  • The initial environment setup with full organization management provides a complete solution set to get started.
  • Patching/Frequent updates disruptive nature must be accepted.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 Screenshots

Screenshot of