Established in 2008, WebPT is an outpatient rehab therapy software platform helping more than 150,000 rehab therapy professionals from all practice sizes and specialties run their practices to improve care delivery and optimize business performance. And because WebPT is a cloud-based application, PTs, OTs, and SLPs can access the platform (and its data) from anywhere, at any time, promoting collaboration across patient care teams and with third-party payers. In addition to its…
$99
per month per user
Pricing
WebPT
Editions & Modules
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
WebPT
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
Additional Details
WebPT Enterprise packages are custom-made based on clinic needs, and prices vary accordingly.
WebPT is so much more user friendly for patients and providers. I like that we can add information to send to people so easily. The home program feature is great to make sure client are on the same pager as us. We will continue to use the features that are helpful
Forms look better, and it makes sure you don't miss notes. Patients can sign in on mobile devices. In my opinion, WebPT is more entry-level and inconsistent. In my experience, WebPT has glitches frequently. Running a business is difficult for me because, in my experience, you …
Verified User
Professional
Chose WebPT
Much better all the way around! More user friendly, compliant, easy on the therapists and billers, etc. WebPT constantly evolves and improves with added services or features all of which have been helpful for us so far. We will be staying with WebPT for the for seeable …
Planning Center was good anytime I worked in large company ministry. They allowed you to upload many things including mp3 song files, which was nice for worship and scheduling purposes. Webpt does more for adding members and clients (like in a medical setting) rather than …
In my opinion, WebPT far outweighs Clinicient in the ability to be user friendly. The first time I used Clinicient after using WebPT, it almost looked like Clinicient was a BETA program in comparison. There are several flaws in the Clinicient system that make it frustrating …
WEBPT's digital platform is much easier overall to navigate and utilize. Each of the settings is clear, concise, and not cluttered. The EMR also allows for improved reliability and was not offline during peak hours, unlike previously utilized EMRs. Its reliability was a key …
There are many different EMR options out there in the rehab world, but I am sure glad that we landed on WebPT. I am sure that, like us, there are plenty of providers looking for an option that provides features and a value that are as impressive as WebPT does. We have looked at …
Therabill has been very helpful to our clinic; although a bit more of a learning curve than WebPT, very easy once learned. Therabill makes it easy to track claims and monitor for payment. Therabill's customer service, much like WebPT, is either hit or miss as well. But, overall …
In 2013, we selected WebPT from Athena, Clinicient, Epic and mainly because of the industry specific knowledge and ease of use. In 2023, we began vetting other options and went with Prompt - which has helped us tremendously!
Jane has been a MARKED improvement for us from WebPT. We were able to customize it to our liking, they offer online scheduling within the software, and billing couldn't be simpler or easier to use. I have been able to handle claims with ease and have had little to no issue with …
I would choose and recommend WebPT to others for how easy it is to navigate and how reliable it is when storing important and confidential information. What's super helpful as well is being able to backtrack cancellations and no show appointments even after removing from the …
OptimisPT is a decent EHR. However, it is very expensive; along with the billing software. WebPT is a good EHR and very inexpensive for what you get. Between the two, WebPT is solid, trustworthy, and budget friendly. The software is always up-to-date. You're always notified …
Acuity is a wonderful and cheap scheduling solution that performs many of the same features WebPT's scheduler does, some better and some worse. However, Acuity is definitely designed more for small clinics or other small client-focused businesses. It took a lot of ingenuity to …
WebPT was much easier to use within documentation, having a singular interface rather than multiple core platforms to jump around in, and has been capacity for carrying information over between sessions.
Also, I have used PTWired and HEP2GO, but they were not in the database. WebPT automatically generates a patient profile, which is very helpful. WebPT also doesn't require the patient to download an app from the App Store, which is an added step for patients to perform, which …
WebPT is well designed for some areas of rehab but not well suited for others. Speech seems to be a challenge for this type of EMR. Perhaps not the best type for this discipline due to limitations. For the other disciplines, it would be nice if the system suggested only specific tests per diagnosis code rather than all available tests in the EMR
The scheduler is very adaptive. There are options to change colors and textures for different insurances and appointment types with make it easier to differentiate patient types and issues at a glance.
Digital Paperwork Intake saves time for both the patient and staff.
Electronic Benefits Verification consolidates verifications so that we do not have to use multiple websites.
I like that it carries forward information from previous notes. I also wonder, though, if there could be a more comprehensive "archive" of activities we had done in the past rather than only copying and paste from the previous note.
I like seeing a few comparisons of my outcome measures--when writing a progress note, I don't just want to see the last measure. Seeing the last 3-4 values from the test would have been helpful to really see different trends.
Fewer click boxes in the evals would be helpful to keep things moving along at some points. I appreciate the variety offered, but also struggle with how much clicking there is to get through.
I gave it 9/10 for renewal because I have been using it for so long. It takes a long time to learn new documentation systems. I do not want to use valuable time on that. I also like that it flows directly into billing.
The EMR has a learning curve, but once you get used to it, it's fairly user-friendly: notes are easy to duplicate, information is thorough and useful. In my opinion, WebPT Billing is arcane and difficult to use, and offers no opportunity for the business to correct or edit any payments entered incorrectly by WebPT.
It is always available to me when needed thankfully, I hadn’t had a moment or a time when I was unable to access it when needed. My practice's power went out once which was the only incident when it was unavailable to everyone on the team but again, it had nothing to do with the availability offered by this product.
Pages often load slowly. Our iMacs are highly reliable and we are connected to the highest speed Comcast business internet. We also connected each iMac via Cat 9 cable during COVID-19 pandemic to speed telelhealth appointments. Zoom does integrate very well with WebPT for telehealth. Their own modules do not integrate well with each other. For example, patients receive separate emails for patient intake and clinical outcomes. If confuses and frustrates many patients. Similarly, EMR flow sheet does not integrate with HEP creating redundancy.
Support was pretty much always helpful. My only complaint was not being able to always get someone on the phone immediately during working hours and having to wait to hear back. But once we heard back, problems were solved quickly and sufficiently. Staff was always friendly and knowledgeable
I was trained by an in house employee. It was very easy to learn. The EMR is pretty self explanatory. When you click on something to complete a task, it doesn't take an extra 10 steps, what the action says, is what it does
WebPT has its entire separate platform for training, containing many different guides, tutorials, and video references to help you become familiar and competent with the software suites. This includes having various demonstrations that allow you to click and navigate pages in the ways you would actually do it in WebPT. WebPT also gives you a sandbox company in the actual website to tinker with and trial things out. This makes it easy to catch and avoid errors you would have otherwise made with active patient data/schedules.
I think it would help to have another education session maybe 6 months after the initial sessions. This would help the user come up with an enhanced experience after they have used the program for a period of time. It is hard to comprehend everything at first, especially for people that need hands on learning
Also, I have used PTWired and HEP2GO, but they were not in the database. WebPT automatically generates a patient profile, which is very helpful. WebPT also doesn't require the patient to download an app from the App Store, which is an added step for patients to perform, which will decrease compliance.
The current terms and pricing would be fair if they provided adequate performance, reliability, support, and customer service. As they have lapsed in these areas WebPT is overpriced. I would not recommend any PT practice of any size agree to a long term contract with WebPT until they prove they will deliver on their promises.
I couldn’t access WebPT on multiple screens to complete tasks at an efficient and effective time. It works to adjust to the same things presented on one screen when trying to work on a separate project utilizing one therapists schedule. This complicated the goal and tasks needed to complete at the time