Acquia Digital Experience PlatformPricing

getting solving answer is too long no support in french hard drive space too expensive

are easily maintained through Acquia's RA branch, I think that there are cheaper options for basic sites. Acquia is strong at supporting Drupal hosting

manage the websites at a high level. Check stats, change key configuration values, backup code and databases, manage SSL, create support tickets and manage

always and seems to be inconsistent Deprecating systems and tools very often Price is too high depending on the services offered Minor UX improvements (eg adding … Negative: Rise the cost of Drupal hosting and support Positive: Maintenance and updates was an easy

ISO rules and practices. Very well suited for enterprise level clients (pricing is also geared towards those). Some products like Site Studio are unique

Websites factories Less appropriate maybe for small websites, considering the cost.

Can do everything AEM does, but faster and cheaper.

Github, to manage the configuration of the front end, while others are in charge of content.

The price can be high for a small business

management. It allows everyone to spend more time innovating and delivering value to the Drupal ecosystem rather than dealing with infrastructure and compliance … Transparency of the pricing structure. Keeping up with the versions of some satellite system (ex. Solr)

Acquia Digital Experience Platform is a good choice. There are certainly cheaper options out there if a less robust solution is tolerable, however. The

not sure if the money spent on Acquia couldn't have been saved on a less expensive hosting platform. Some of our contracts seem backed with features and extras

Price and product quotations are missing on any of platform

consumer journey, faster time to market for new initiatives, and a lower total cost of ownership.

Reduce the overall maintenance cost Keeping the website up and running, that means high availability platform

simpler solutions on the small side, but I guarantee Acquia will still provide value for even the smallest sites through its platform and associated tools. And

previous websites/roles. Pantheon is attractive due to the competitive pricing, while Adobe Experience Manager has never been terribly attractive as it's

able to have auto-scaling in the near future to optimize the economical value of Acquia Digital Experience Platform.

Little to no downtime They stay in touch related to updates Reasonable pricing … Much of our business is based on live sports events. We can't afford any service interruptions. Acquia has a super reliable track record on this

TAMs helped us to reduce the servers cost by helping us to fine tune the performance.

remember there are limits on your number or request you can make, all this has a cost impact.

WordPress plugins and platforms are easier to use and cheaper but our site is built in Drupal so Acquia [Digital Experience Platform]

Platform] is a premium service, and the cost reflects that. I am extremely happy that I work for a company that can afford such a flexible, scalable, and secure

Because we needed to remain on Drupal CMS, the pricing was right related to the service, and the platform had already built-in

Gives a lot of functional flexibility at a reasonable entry/price point. Allows for unlimited customization, is very flexible, and gives enough