#1 most frequent
United States of America
33.5%478 installations of 1,428
Categories & Use Cases
Media
1 / 4
Screenshot of The Dynamic Yield Dashboard, which offers a high-level overview of personalization campaigns, site performance, audiences, product updates, and more. With customers building and managing dozens, sometimes even hundreds of concurrent campaigns, the Dynamic Yield dashboard provides a snapshot of key information and surfaces items for potential optimization from campaigns that require action.
Who Buys & Uses Dynamic Yield
#2 most frequent
Germany
10.9%156 installations of 1,428
#3 most frequent
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
8.0%114 installations of 1,428
Pros
- Robust personalization and audience creation capabilities
- Strong A/B testing features for systematic validation
- Enables tailored site experiences based on user behavior
Cons
- Requires substantial development effort for advanced personalization
- Limited out-of-the-box functionalities for specialized use cases (e.g., upsells, mobile apps)
- Reporting capabilities lack robust, centralized global dashboards
A great testing and personalisation product
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Dynamic Yield is a great tool that enables you to really scale up A/B/n testing and personalisation in a way that a smallish company by themselves wouldn't be able to achieve. The interface is self-explanatory and has some great options for targeting and audience creation. Having previously used Google Optimize it was easy to move over.
Pros
- A/B/n testing to ensure new features are adding value
- Audience creation to select specific groups of users to target
- Personalisation to change the site depending on the type of user
Cons
- Implementation was more involved than with Google Optimize
Return on Investment
- By running A/B tests we can ensure we're driving value and not having negative impacts
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Google Optimize
Great value personalisation and testing tool with great support
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
I use Dynamic Yield for A/B Testing, setting up recommendations and personalisation on our websites. Dynamic Yield helps us to test and learn optimisation ideas and having the capability to measure how incremental value the tool has since we onboarded.
Pros
- AB Testing
- Product Recommendations
- Personalisation
Cons
- More out of the box features for upsells/cross-sells and bundles
Return on Investment
- Even though we've only used Dynamic Yield for 6 months, we feel that we're already getting the return of investment.
- We're able to launch features that we weren't able to do before such as Basket Builder.
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Monetate and Google Optimize
Other Software Used
Contentsquare
Dynamic Yield - A masterpiece of Many Things
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Dynamic Yield for our websites for A/B Test, membership popups on homepage, banner on booking engine, inactivity popup box, A/B tests.Business problems that is solves are low conversion rates by adding inactivity popup box, Static content experience by showing dynamic content based on segmentation like country, mem or nonmem users, Better A/B testing and optimization.Scope of use are web personalization in form of Banners, Popups, inactivity lightbox, newsletter sign up, personalized content. One good feature is AI powered product recommendations on homepage, segmentation and targeting (new vs. returning users, loyalty members)
A/B testing for continuously improve UI/UX and Omnichannel consistency to unify experience across different channels
A/B testing for continuously improve UI/UX and Omnichannel consistency to unify experience across different channels
Pros
- Advanced Personalization & Segmentation - Example First time users who are visiting our website, users who are Atlantis member, Users who are UAE resident or non - UAE residents.
- A/B & Multivariate Testing - Marketers and product teams can easily set up A/B, split URL, and multivariate tests without involving developers. One with static hero image, one with countdown sale, one popup.
- Ease of Use & Marketing Control - Non-technical users can launch complex campaigns using the no-code interface, while developers still have the option to use the APIs and SDKs for custom work.
Cons
- Sometime we have to use CSS to create experience from scratch.
- The pre built template that DY have, they do not have the ability to change the look and feel, brand colour, brand text. We have to use CSS for it
- While Dynamic Yield supports app personalization through SDKs, mobile app use cases require more dev involvement and aren't as out-of-the-box as web campaigns.
Return on Investment
- It works well for us in terms of ROI and room bookings because of different functionalities
- It fulfills our KPI of getting more people becoming members with the help of newsletter sign up popups on homepage
- For every sale that we have, we try to keep Sale popup on homepage for the users to visit the sale landing page
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Monetate
Dynamic Yield The Personalisation Powerhouse.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Dynamic Yield is primarily a no-bottleneck tool we use to personalise content on our website. Although the initial CSS set-up takes time, the payoff has been very fruitful. Unique customisable templates, quick hotfixes on webstore enhancements, and a large variety of campaign types that can be previewed and published in real-time make Dynamic Yield the ultimate game-changer for tailored experiences. Not only will guests see content relevant to them, but this can also be tweaked over time through testing methods that utilize slick components, allowing for effortless measurement. Dynamic Yield also takes A/B testing to another level; users can split allocations beyond just the 50/50 threshold. Additionally, a powerful dynamic allocation method can be applied, whereby components with higher engagement will take precedence, making them more prevalent. It solves the business problem of not having enough data-driven actions, without requiring the involvement of a complex development team. Dynamic Yield has shifted from becoming a tool we occasionally use to gather insights to a business necessity imperative for making data-driven decisions.
Pros
- Dynamic allocation.
- Addressing cart abandonment issues.
- Affinity-based targeting.
- Pop-ups and banners.
Cons
- Brand templates could need complex CSS/custom code.
- We'd like to see a little "i" next to specific labels, which elaborates on what is meant. For example, when I hover over "Dynamic allocation," I get something like "An advanced form of A/B testing where the best-performing variations receive higher traffic."
- Jargon (for example, for audience targeting) can be overwhelming for new users; therefore, clearer, user-friendly explanations are needed.
Return on Investment
- 20% increase in bookings from repeat visitors due to retargeting efforts.
- Pop-ups appearing after a short idle time recapture users by up to 35%.
- 17% higher CTR through A/B testing on various component types (like dynamic content, overlays, visual edits, multi-touch).
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Monetate and Google Optimize
Other Software Used
Monetate, Adobe Audience Manager, Google BigQuery
Dynamic Yield for Enterprise Experimentation Personalisation
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Dynamic Yield for both onsite and offsite personalisation in 29 countries around the world today.
We leverage the platform for Product Recommendations, Content Personalisation and Experimentation / A/B Testing in all markets.
For Offiste, we are leveraging the Reconnect toolset to embed Product Recommendations into targeted email and web push notifications.
We leverage the platform for Product Recommendations, Content Personalisation and Experimentation / A/B Testing in all markets.
For Offiste, we are leveraging the Reconnect toolset to embed Product Recommendations into targeted email and web push notifications.
Pros
- Predictive Targeting
- Product Listing Page Personalisation
- Affinity Profiles
- Segment of one Personalisation
Cons
- Global campaign management, today we have to implement campaigns repeatedly across different country sites
- Global dashboards for campaign performance tracking, this is very fragmented at present
- Elements tool seems to be particularly focused on the US, would be great to see this working in other markets as well.
Return on Investment
- We see a very positive return on the investment that we have made with Dynamic Yield
- The ROI is in line with the expectations that we have of the tool, YoY growth remains constant.
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Other Software Used
Similarweb, Adobe Commerce, Fullstory
