MattermostPricing

problems; and then a closed-source service that kept raising its cost to a point where it was not cost-effective for us anymore. Mattermost solved both problems … previously used other solutions and chat services, but they were in some cases expensive for the number of users we have, or inefficient. We have migrated to Mattermost … source code. - Companies…

teams that want to take advantage of what Slack offers without incurring the cost or opening up the security risks of a cloud-based collaboration platform … allowed us to implement videoconferencing between our offices very simply and cheaply. Some non-technical users have…

It's a good tool that our people enjoy using. It's open source! It's less expensive and less cumbersome than the competition.

of cost-effectiveness, simplicity of maintenance, and control over your business data. We chose Mattermost because our company's structure is cost-prohibitive … Mattermost is used by my company as a cost-effective alternative to other collaboration platforms. It allows us to effectively delineate our different … way, we do have…

Big companies can't afford to risk a security incident. So, it's great that you have the option of … Mattermost is cheaper and offers the possibility of self-hosting compared to other competitors

to other corporate IMs for small startups due to it being competitively priced in the market. However, given that most of the bugs/improvements take quite … mattermost. However, the previously mentioned reason & the competitive pricing allowed us to stick with mattermost.…

productive, efficient, effective, agile and responsive. As a company that values transparency and collaboration, we were looking for an option that would … offered the full range of features we were looking for at such a reasonable price point.

process reports and task management with Mattermost functions is incredible and cost-effective.

Regarding profitability, I can say that it is favorable due to the good price it offers, it has great capacity and, in general terms, the functions are … Mattermost is cheaper and has better security features.

If you're looking for a replacement for Slack it is a good choice. It is cheaper and makes more sense.

Bringing up our Mattermost instance cost us very little in terms of manpower and infrastructure, so ROI was almost … always encumbered with ongoing licensing and maintenance costs, plus the cost of people to maintain the servers those run on. Mattermost runs on a

excellent and has many of the same features as Mattermost. However, the cost if you have a larger group can be prohibitive. Mattermost is a better ROI

country. We looked at creating a channel in Slack, but the fee to add multiple domains was cost prohibitive. Mattermost is a wonderful solution that allows … to stay up-to-date with everyone. It is very comparable to Slack, but more cost effective when opening up your channel to multiple users outside of our organization … any domain to join our conversation, allowing us t…

Slack got very expensive and limited for the use we expected and also for the economic resources

glitches were frequent occurrences Base pricing is competitive with Slack, but enterprise features come at a hefty price Webhooks are cumbersome to set up compared

Good value compared to Slack. Many users prefer it to Teams. … Cost competitive

Mattermost is well suited for startups what want to keep cost low, want to be able to keep their conversations for life, and want more