Overall Satisfaction with Acumatica
I use Acumatica primarily for financial reporting. It is the ERP that has been adopted for corporate and construction financial reporting.
- Approval workflows
- Reports are easy to read
- Entering AP
- Needs to have an integration for smaller GC's to manage sub-billing
- Ability to run reports across fiscal years
- Easier tracing of data
- Too much time required to research and correct mistakes
7-12 months
It has made me realize the push to house more data within Acumatica to hopefully ease some difficulties. For example, inventory, project estimates, and warehouse.
Still trying to determine the best way for Acumatica to suit our specific needs.
Have not used
Do you think Acumatica delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Acumatica's feature set?
No
Did Acumatica live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Acumatica go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Acumatica again?
Yes
Acumatica Feature Ratings
Using Acumatica
5 - Procurement
Project Management
Finance
Project Management
Finance
2 - Our support comes from our parent company
- Procurement
- Project Management
- Accounting
- Still TBD
Evaluating Acumatica and Competitors
- Other
Acumatica was already in place by our parent company.
Acumatica Implementation
Acumatica Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
None | None |
Yes! When the new tenant I work in was set up, it was set up in a way that was not going to be used. Support went above and beyond to help me with the corrections required for data to reflect as needed.
Using Acumatica
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
None | Unnecessarily complex Difficult to use Requires technical support Not well integrated Inconsistent Cumbersome Feel nervous using Lots to learn |
- None
- Navigating error messages
- Researching data