Item: Adobe Workfront
Rating: 7
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Workfront

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

All of our teams use Workfront to keep track of our project status. While it does work as intended, a lot of times, there are many glitches that would slow down our process. Workfront also relies heavily on AWS, so we were not able to connect to it when AWS is down. Other than that, the software serves us just fine.

Pros and Cons

Pros

We are able to comment anywhere.
Uploads are generally quite quick.
Every task has a reference number.

Cons

Proofs are slow to open.
Project tasks can be overly complex.
Sometimes slow to function.

Return on Investment

Easier project management.
Easy to input time.

Product Flexibility

We also use Workfront as a bridge between Frame.IO and Figma.

Visibility

We are able to communicate effectively across the many teams.

Alternatives Considered

Adobe PhotoShop, Adobe Illustrator CC and Adobe InDesign

Key Insights

Do you think Adobe Workfront delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Adobe Workfront's feature set?

Yes

Did Adobe Workfront live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Adobe Workfront go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Adobe Workfront again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Adobe PhotoShop, Adobe Illustrator CC, Adobe InDesign

Likelihood to Recommend

It is well suited for project management.

Adobe Workfront Feature Ratings

Using Adobe Workfront

Usability

Workfront is overly complex, but it is functional as a tool to keep track of projects. It is a shame that sometimes it takes a lot of clicks to find anything. Workfront is slowly modernizing its interface but at the same time, hides certain information away thus making the experience feels worse.