Overall Satisfaction with Workfront
Workfront (formerly AtTask) is being used to track all internal project requests for the Web and Development team on our site. This includes any marketing campaigns or updates to the site. We also use it for our analytic's projects and later this year our Marketing team is looking to implement Workfront to manage their projects. The business problems it addresses is we are able to minimize meetings and internal email. Workfront gives everyone high level visibility into their projects down to the smallest detail. It allows us to communicate within the project so that we have an audit trail on the project. It brings all of the teams closer together to help with approvals and the completion of the projects.
- Collaborate on all of your projects.
- Easy to plan & track your projects and to create custom forms.
- Easy to customize the reporting and dashboard feature.
- Needs improvement on the comments tab of the project. On the comments tab, when you make a comment it would be nice to be able to bold text or highlight in a color. Right now when you make a comment the text is all the same and to explain a simple text edit to a project you have to copy in a word document, mark-up and then upload in documents tab and share document for the edits to be made. This feature added to the comments tab would allow you to indicate simple text edits to a project.
- We have cut our meetings by 50%.
- With the reporting part of Workfront (AtTask) we are able to keep to our deadlines and prioritize the projects better.
- Mavenlink Project Management Software,WorkZone
Workfront (AtTask) had an issue tracking system, workflow system, reporting and analyses and it also had ProofHQ integration for our proofing needs. The other products did not have these features so we chose to go with Workfront (AtTask) as our project management tool.
Using Workfront
We use Workfront to track, schedule and collaborate on all Web projects. The Web team works on all request from Channels within the bank that are on our website.
Workfront Implementation
- Vendor implemented
Yes - 1. First phase was for everyone to go through all training material pertaining to their access level within Workfront. Then we were setup to test and create Issue's, Projects & Task in the Sandbox environment. This phase was about 4 weeks.
2. Second phase was I documented our workflow and then a consultant came onsite, to start the implementation and this took about two weeks.
3. Third phase was adding all current projects from my spreadsheet into Workfront, this took about two weeks. We have been successfully working in Workfront since February of 2014.
2. Second phase was I documented our workflow and then a consultant came onsite, to start the implementation and this took about two weeks.
3. Third phase was adding all current projects from my spreadsheet into Workfront, this took about two weeks. We have been successfully working in Workfront since February of 2014.
Change management was minimal