The Future: Boomi
Overall Satisfaction with Boomi
Problem is the lack of proper integration mechanisms to smoothly integrate these systems with the business systems, while ensuring secured flow of information without any discrepancies in the service/data delivery flows. Here comes the need for Application Programming Interface (API). API provides a standard way for these systems to interact with each other, thereby making
Pros
- Hybrid Integration for both on-premise and cloud systems
- Low code to no code setup
- Various Endpoints
Cons
- Cost effiency
- Integration to communication tools such as Viber/WhatsApp/Messenger etc
- API Management & Development
- Salesforce/SAP/NetSuite Integration
- Task Management
- Low Code Configuration
- Endpoint costing
- Connectivity Efficiency
- Easy Setup
MuleSoft and Boomi are built on totally different frameworks. Mulesoft is an API-led network whereas Boomi is an ETL middleware approach. In easy words, Mulesoft can connect to several apps and business units, can create and reuse multiple components. Boomi offers only on-premise and on-cloud integration solutions whereas MuleSoft is capable of providing on-premise, on-cloud as well as hybrid solutions. We can say that MuleSoft is much more flexible and offers multiple integration solutions.
Do you think Boomi delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Boomi's feature set?
Yes
Did Boomi live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Boomi go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Boomi again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation