BrowserStack is still King
October 06, 2025

BrowserStack is still King

Kristopher LaGreca | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

Solo

Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack

We primarily use BrowserStack for live, cross-browser testing. We are rebuilding over 15 websites and need to verify the site looks and works consistent in 22+ different browsers. We plan on taking advantage of the automated testing next, to be sure that, for example, forms work consistently and that their workflows are indeed firing properly.

Pros

  • cross-browser testing
  • automated testing
  • no-code automated testing

Cons

  • more optimized UI
  • better organization of tool
  • instead of more tools - synthesize and combine functionality for a streamlined UX
  • screenshot test
  • live cross-browser testing
  • website scanner
  • improved responsive design
  • streamlined testing
  • allows us to find bugs quicker
Reliability in responsive design.
  • Live
it's comprehensive.
BrowserStack is still the most comprehensive and easiest tool stack to use, compared to Smart Bear and Lambda test.

Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?

Yes

Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy BrowserStack again?

Yes

BrowserStack is a immense stack. There's a tool for anyone, anything. From a solo developer to enterprise teams - its works for all scenarios. BUT that's also a weakness. There's too many tools in the stack. It would be better to combine similar or overlapping features. For example the live browser test and snapshots should be merged into one. Also, would love a periodic snapshot test that tells me if there's a threshold of divergence between screenshots, effectively automating cross-browser testing.

Comments

More Reviews of BrowserStack