BrowserStack is still King
Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack
We primarily use BrowserStack for live, cross-browser testing. We are rebuilding over 15 websites and need to verify the site looks and works consistent in 22+ different browsers. We plan on taking advantage of the automated testing next, to be sure that, for example, forms work consistently and that their workflows are indeed firing properly.
Pros
- cross-browser testing
- automated testing
- no-code automated testing
Cons
- more optimized UI
- better organization of tool
- instead of more tools - synthesize and combine functionality for a streamlined UX
- screenshot test
- live cross-browser testing
- website scanner
- improved responsive design
- streamlined testing
- allows us to find bugs quicker
Reliability in responsive design.
- Live
it's comprehensive.
BrowserStack is still the most comprehensive and easiest tool stack to use, compared to Smart Bear and Lambda test.
Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?
Yes
Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy BrowserStack again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation