Cisco Identity Engine (ISE) a great product
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Cisco ISE began to be used to solve the problem of Wi-Fi authentication. Later the authorization and accounting capabilities were incorporated for the accesses of the technical equipment. We are currently rolling out the profiling features. All with a focus on security and user experience, seeking safer accesses, a higher level of control and auditing, [and] additionally a profiling based on user / device that allows simplifying administration and that people can perform their tasks regardless of the device they are using.
Pros
- Manage high-privilege access to communications equipment. It allows to be granular in the permissions, to have it integrated with the LDAP users and, most importantly, to audit what tasks each user performed.
- Profile users and devices and assign privileges and access levels based on that combination. It greatly improves the user experience, since it does not depend on the network it is in, but on the access levels it has depending on the device. It also allows self-managed guest access with approval flow, which is essential for our business.
- It has also allowed us to automate actions based on findings from StealWatch, Umbrella, AMP, etc.
Cons
- It could be integrated with third party products.
- The interface could be a bit more user friendly.
- Could be integrated with social networks for guest authentication.
- Improve security.
- Simplify the management of permissions and access levels.
- It is difficult to establish or calculate ROI.
- Improve the user experience.
- Citrix Gateway (formerly NetScaler Unified Gateway) and Pulse Policy Secure
In our case, the entire core of our network is based on Cisco technologies as well as user access. For this reason it was the simplest choice given that both by integration and by knowledge of the platform it was the solution with the least complexity and the best adoption curve offered us.
At the level of capabilities, they seemed really similar to us, each option having some point where it surpassed the others and others where it was surpassed.
At the level of capabilities, they seemed really similar to us, each option having some point where it surpassed the others and others where it was surpassed.
Do you think Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation