Using DraftSight in chemical engineering
Overall Satisfaction with DraftSight
I use DraftSight extensively in designing the entire emission control system for customer manufacturing processes. The design includes a General Arrangement (GA) plan and elevation layouts, details of components, sectional views of process equipment, and Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID). I export the detailed design drawings, typically as .dwg files, to customers and construction contractors for installation of equipment. It would be a challenge to work with both customer engineers and their construction crews without DraftSight, which greatly facilitates my work.
Pros
- It allows me to quickly fit equipment into tight spaces because it is very flexible.
- It is easy to learn and use, and its numerous features give me many options in the design phase.
- It provides me with a single tool to design everything from layouts to instrumentation drawings.
- It enables independent small users like me to wield the design capability of a large enterprise.
Cons
- It would be more efficient to have direct access to Help Support, although the Help feature and Forum can often answer questions.
- For instrumentation, an embedded symbol library would be valuable. I currently have to create my own library.
- For layouts, an embedded equipment symbol library (for example, pumps, motors) would be helpful.
- The ability to quickly commit new features into an existing design
- Ease of use once you understand the various tools
- A great variety of design tools
- Now that I use DraftSight, I can parlay a small investment in the software to a consulting rate of $300 per hour, thereby paying for it in 30 minutes.
- Using DraftSight, I can easily compete with larger enterprises and be more nimble.
- The use of DraftSight has actually extended my skill set, allowing me to add new features to my designs.
- My work is now presented in a more professional manner, and has gained me more respect.
Do you think DraftSight delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with DraftSight's feature set?
Yes
Did DraftSight live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of DraftSight go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy DraftSight again?
Yes
Using DraftSight
1 - As a design chemical engineer, I provide the range of services needed in my startup. This includes development of process calculations, conceptual design, and moving the design to a CAD file.
1 - A deep understanding of process chemical engineering; ability to go from a simple concept to a full- fledged CAD design that other professionals can understand and then use effectively.
- Development of chemical engineering process flow balances
- Development of general arrangement elevation and plan views
- Development of Piping & Instrumentation drawings
- The ability to re- design equipment to fit into unexpected small spaces
- Exploiting the presence of different physical orientations to optimize our design
- Simplifying piping layouts for quicker field installation
- Moving from current industry sectors like power plants to new sectors
- Optimizing our design in current sectors to reduce capital costs
- Gaining new customers with more professional CAD
Evaluating DraftSight and Competitors
- Product Usability
As noted earlier, we had to find a way to compete with far larger and very competent organizations at a low cost. This meant being nimble and equally professional at the same time. It helped that we could come up the learning curve quickly.
I expect that DraftSight will continue to improve, allowing us to refine our designs and compete even better with others. I would herefore not change my process of evaluation and selection unless the software stumbled.
DraftSight Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal - Assuming you are referring to the ability to make design revisions, this was actually easy.
- Creating a scaled version to start
DraftSight Training
- No Training
It was relatively easy since I was moderately familiar with CAD. For beginners, I recommend training as it would otherwise be time consuming.
Configuring DraftSight
For beginners, a few pop up tips to expedite the process would be very helpful.
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
We did none and have no recommendations because it is useful as installed.
DraftSight Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
None | Less knowledgeable Problems left unsolved Difficult to get immediate help Slow Initial Response |
We did not as we cannot afford it. Our time and financial resources are very limited.
Regretfully, we have none.
Using DraftSight
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Moving from a concept to design
- Creating process drawings that customers could quickly use
- Providing field construction crews with key instructions they could implement
- Creating a desired scale
- Finding templates to add features
DraftSight Reliability
Integrating DraftSight
- We have never attempted to integrate, as we have had no need to do so in the past.
- Not at this time.
- File import/export
No.
Follow the instructions carefully, or simply practice several times.
Relationship with Dassault Systemes
We did not have to negotiate any, nor were we trying.
If you really need to talk to a human, try using the chatbot, and if not satisfied, look for a link to a phone number. Some issues really need human intervention.
Upgrading DraftSight
- We did not upgrade.
- Pop up tips when we are in a quandary would help.
- More intuitive menus when setting scale and dimensions.
Yes - We did this a few years in the past, likely because we wanted the most powerful features we could get at a reasonable cost. As we develop our startup, it is probable that we would upgrade to Enterprise. The previous upgrade to Professional was quick and worked very well.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation