Google BigQuery is ok!
Overall Satisfaction with Google BigQuery
Google Big Query was a contender for our proprietary database to be used as the cloud database to predict scoring models. We use machine learning to predict if someone is going to default on their loan, and use machine learning to determine how much money someone is eligible for. Google Big Query was an option considered for managing this data.
Pros
- Cloud based architecture rather than client based architecture
- There is a free trial
- Google product so the support is very good
Cons
- Most organizations use SQL so it is a bit of an adjustment
- No other major issues - serverless data is great and hard to frown upon
- Large queries run well in the program
- Cloudless - no issues of the server being hacked or crashing
- Google Product - great support and works well with other Google Products
- Friendly interface
- It would have a positive ROI, the price is reasonable and machine learning always benefits your organization
- Machine learning in general has profited the company extremely
Treasure Data is more for the marketer rather than a developer audience, so depending on who your main users will be for the machine learning you can decide which tool is better. In our case we went with Treasure Data because it was more for a marketer and less for the developer side.
Do you think Google BigQuery delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Google BigQuery's feature set?
Yes
Did Google BigQuery live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Google BigQuery go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Google BigQuery again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation