Miro for conducting co-design sessions as a designer/researcher
October 29, 2021
Miro for conducting co-design sessions as a designer/researcher
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
I am a UX researcher/designer of my HCI research group. As a designer and researcher of our group, I personally used Miro for conducting online interviews and co-design sessions because it was an easy tool for non-design professionals to learn the functions and participate in the design sessions that I have been conducting.
Pros
- Straightforward and easy to learn tools/functions.
- Online collaboration.
- Simple, clean and beautiful layout.
- Sharing board options.
Cons
- Drawing function with a pen tool -> I frequently asked my design session participants to use a pen tool to draw directly on the board. However, each stroke drawn with a pen tool is recognized as a separate object and slows down the processing speed.
- Enabled the online co-design session with people all over the world during the corona time when offline face-to-face meetings were forbidden.
- So far not a recognized negative impact with Miro.
My organization doesn't use the Miro board as a team, but some designers use the Miro board individually and separately for their own research projects.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation