Item: Miro
Rating: 9
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are using Miro for ideation and capturing, and communicating product requirements.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Whiteboarding
Many templates
Integrating document formats like Powerpoint.

Cons

Co-editing feature needs work.
Ability to view embedded powerpoint in full screen.
Not all controls are intuitive.

Return on Investment

Faster time to launch.
Faster time to value.
Less time spent looking for documents and notes.

Miro is good for capturing product requirements for 0-1 products. Miro is good for capturing team responsibilitiesMiro is good for cross-functional team CollaborationMiro is good for DocumentationMiro is good for presentationsMiro is not so great at multiple users editing a document at the same exact time.

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Alternatives Considered

MURAL

Miro has great enterprise support.

Other Software Used

Aha!, Atlassian Jira Align, Atlassian Confluence

Likelihood to Recommend

Miro is good for capturing product requirements for 0-1 products. Miro is good at Capturing team responsibilities. Miro is good for cross-functional team Collaboration Miro is good at Documentation Miro is good at presentations. Miro is not so great at multiple users editing a document at the same exact time.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Miro is great for an enterprise whiteboarding solution.