Virtual Design Collaboration
March 08, 2023
Virtual Design Collaboration
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
We use Miro as a digital whiteboard for architectural projects. It can be used as early as the original pursuit of a competition, all the way through final drawings and renderings. In most cases, a single Miro board operates as the project's scratch space and timeline, representing the development of the entire project. We also have used Miro for user engagement sessions with potential occupants for a space, such as teachers or employees, to provide feedback and partake in exercises.
Pros
- Quick Setup
- Easy sharing settings
- Ability to insert collateral from various sources
Cons
- Opening up the Miro ecosystem to automation tools like PowerAutomate to create boards based on forms or SharePoint Lists
- Board Health metrics. Allow for a visible indicator when a board has too much content on it and is impeding speed and stability
- Allowed for User Engagement Sessions with Remote Work
- Allowed for Project Teams to be displaced across the country and still work collectively
- Changing tool access for guest accounts has been a headache, constantly having to change our training documentation because tools have shifted from the free to premium side of licensing.
Yes - as discussed in earlier comments. Miro enabled our teams to collaborate remotely on all our design projects.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation