Miro- Great for Cross-Functional Team Use
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Miro is currently used for a variety of tasks depending on department. We use if from everything as simple as documenting the lead nurturing email flows for our various products to complex user research tasks that require cross-team collaboration to succeed (e.g. marketing, CRO optimization team, automation team, content and design team + engineering). Because Miro allows for the integration of Jira, we are also able to create project road maps with links to and timelines generated from the tickets we use to organize tasks. Miro also houses all of our quarterly goal mapping. Finally, we use it for brainstorming before, during, and after meetings since our company works in a hybrid model. It's a safe and accessible place to store all of the ideas we come up with while asynch
Pros
- Miro does a great job of integrating with other tools, which makes hopping between them and automating information shared between them fast and easy
- I love the AI tools that can help summarize complex boards into digestible information for those less involved in certain projects.
- Miro was easy to be onboarded onto-- it's intuitive and easy to catch on to how to utilize different components (and you can be walked through them with the talk track even!)
Cons
- When working with a lot of people on a board, it's easy for things to get a little bit messy, quickly. People accidentally delete or move something, and negative changes can go by unnoticed.
- I would love to have some sort of pretty color scheme generator, which is such a minor and small thing, but aesthetics help me engage more with content.
- For the timeline feature, it would be neat to be able to link to Jira tickets or have it update dynamically somehow when project timelines are changed in other apps.
- We're able to integrate information from 10+ departments in various ways across various boards in a way that would be very difficult in most tools.
- Integration of tools like Jira and Confluence cuts down on a significant amount of time that would be spent switching from tab to tab and searching while presenting-- on a personal note, my colleagues directly putting referenced tickets and seeing task ownership with embeded Jira boards within our product planning Miro spaces saves me 20-30 minutes of useless searching and asking for confirmation from the task-givers per day.
- Being able to work collaboratively in a way that is built so well for effective asynchronous co-creation has cut down on inefficient and under-attended meetings to get such cross-fuctional team tasks done by around 5 meetings per week within my team.
We have been able to save a ton of time because things like talk tracks allow people to asynchronously communicate with and learn from other team members. The boards themselves are vital to almost every meeting we have because our team works in a hybrid model across Germany, meaning virtually every meeting will have members who aren't in the office. Miro helps everyone's voice get heard and allows for equal possibility to contribute to a project.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation