Makes collaborating for research easy across teams and clients | TrustRadius

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I use it for UX work, from discussing test plans, results of sessions, through to co-designing Information Architectures

Pros and Cons

Pros

joint collaboration
visualisation of content
mass content in one place

Cons

accessibility - those with assistive needs still struggle to use it
wireframing, Balsamiq is still easier and quicker
most it notes sometimes give issues with word limits
free text - issues with word limits means having to create a new free text box which can ruin numbering

Return on Investment

reduced in person testing for focus groups and user testing

Implementation Rating

8

Collaboration

easily discuss projects altogether on one platform

Alternatives Considered

Balsamiq and Figma

I still use the other two for different reasons.

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Balsamiq, Figma

Likelihood to Recommend

sharing information eg discussing test scenarios, discussing outcomes of testing and deciding next steps together. Giving clients homework!

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation