Supercharging collaboration with Miro.
March 06, 2025

Supercharging collaboration with Miro.

Adam Safranek | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

In our organization, we use Miro for various whiteboarding tasks. While our sales team uses it for brainstorming, the product development team uses it for mapping the workflow/process flows using roadmaps and documents, and management uses it for prioritizing tasks. Miro now exceeds its competitors, offering a significantly wider range of features and great collaboration tools.

Pros

  • Collaboration tools.
  • Process mapping and documenting.
  • Visual roadmaps.

Cons

  • Explainer diagrams are much easier to create in other tools.
  • Search capabilities could be improved.
  • Steeper learning curve.
  • Streamlining project efficiency by double-digit percentages.
  • Faster decision-making process.
  • We can create many more ideas using Miro's collaborative tools when brainstorming.
Miro is an excellent tool for brainstorming and teamwork. Even while working remotely, it facilitates project organisation, brainstorming, and planning. Many people can collaborate in real time because of the straightforward design, which can be overwhelming at first, but as users onboard, it gets easier to use. Deployment was quick and without any issues.
Miro integrates well with tools like Jira, Slack, Figma, and Teams. Customisation is possible using API parameters, and setup is simple. However, syncing huge databases can occasionally be slow, and certain integrations require additional settings. It would be even more powerful with improved automation for intricate workflows. However, switching to other products, such as FigJam, would be hard.
Miro has significantly improved user collaboration with remote office workers and offices worldwide (we have over 400+ offices in 60+ countries). Miro has sped up our brainstorming processes, improved engagement, and tremendously streamlined the roadmapping/process mapping process. All project-related visuals are in one space, accessible by everyone, making it transparent and easy to use for various people.
Excalidraw is straightforward to use for basic, hand-drawn sketches, but it lacks some of Miro's capabilities. Miro is superior for more intricate projects requiring a more significant number of collaboration options. FigJam is not as effective for non-design jobs, but it works well with Figma. Miro offers additional tools, integrations, and templates for collaborating with various teams. Although Mural and Miro are similar, I thought Miro's interface was more user-friendly and adaptable. Miro is better suited to our needs because it can link to more tools. I selected Miro because it is feature-rich and adaptable to various tasks, making it simple for our team to work together on multiple projects.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Miro is an excellent tool for creativity and collaboration. It facilitates planning, idea generation, and visual concept organisation. Even working remotely is made simple by real-time cooperation. With so many options, it can occasionally feel overwhelming, but it becomes helpful as you get used to it. Ideal for groups who want an adaptable and dynamic work environment!

Comments

More Reviews of Miro

  1. Home
  2. Visual Collaboration Software
  3. Miro Reviews
  4. User Review of Miro