Good for translating mental frameworks
February 05, 2026

Good for translating mental frameworks

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

I use it for multiple situations:
- to explain a technical architecture
- to explore use cases and how they relate to each other
- to design a business flow
- to present a rollout plan
The scope is essentially any mental model that I need to present in a visual way. It really supports most of the situations where I need to frame a problem or context to my team and/or stakeholders.

Pros

  • Flowcharts for business processes
  • Mockups
  • Mindmaps

Cons

  • Presentations
  • Creating re-usable items
  • Templates
  • Communication improvement
  • Productivity efficiency
  • Reducing software
I find the product extremely easy to use and intuitive. I like the different capabilities, I also like the software logos for making it easier to describe system architecture.
We do not use Miro for collaboration much. The features that have impacted me the most are the mindmap feature, the software logos, and ease of use.
Yes, but not completely. I definitely use power point less because of Miro and I don't use Figma for mockups. Our team still uses those tools for other thing though, and we use Lucidcharts for our retro boards.
I like Miro for its all-in-one and how I can organize my projects in an easy way

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

For mindmaps and listing use cases and how they relate to each other. For documenting business processes.

Comments

More Reviews of Miro