Overall Satisfaction with TeamViewer
TeamViewer is currently being used for two of our big vendors, their use is so they can gain access into their servers and applications in our environment. For security reasons, we do not install directly on the infrastructure, but rather have a dedicated computer that it runs on and the local IT team is required to RDP into the appliance and servers
- TeamViewer is very good at allowing the local install to stay "alive". When I say that I mean, the access ID doesn't change, so the vendor doesn't have to type in the access code every time they want access. The only thing they need to enter is the password, so its ease of use is good
- TeamViewer has a local FTP\SFTP\File transfer agent so it can send files to the local install, which is very helpful
- The install and runtime takes up very little CPU and Memory
- Its launch time can take longer than other remote access apps.
- There are times the app doesn't launch when clicked and you need to kill the services in task manager to get it to work
- Fast vendor access is a plus
- Easy and little work for the local IT team to get the vendor(s) going
- Can be a little slower than other comparable apps to launch\load
TeamViewer, as currently used is probably the best of the applications I have used, right up there with Bomgar. With Bomgar, we are actually administrating, and we love the back-end features of Bomgar, i.e. I can access the remote servers\workstations on the back-end without the user knowing. I do not know if TeamViewer possesses that functionality since we are more on the receiving end as the vendors run it.