TeamViewer Reviews

I've used all three above for many years. I switched over to TeamViewer for a couple of reasons.
1. Cost 2. Support 3. Product changes. TeamViewer offers nearly all what the three products above do all in one price.

LogMeIn was getting more expensive and giving less. Their support team was also not as quick to resolving some issues we had with our accounts.

TeamViewer is much more reliable connection and security-wise, it offers more options, has live chat, and is faster. The file transfer is something that makes TeamViewer the number one choice. The quality of the connection does depend on the internet speed, of course, but even using the same internet speeds, TeamViewer gets much better results than most of other software solutions in this field.

I have also used the Cisco Webex and for some tasks like screen-sharing and video conferencing also Skype. TeamViewer is, in my opinion, a better tool when speaking of PC and laptop screen sharing. I know there is a support also for mobile platforms, but have tried this only for videoconferencing purposes.

We were using the built-in functionally on SysAid, but it was always a challenge as it relied on an agent being deployed to the target workstation, whereas with TeamViewer, you can just send the user a link to download and run the custom client, and immediately see them on the portal.

We also tested TeamViewer Embedded with SysAid, but it presented the same challenges, as it still relied on an agent to be successfully deployed before we could connect to the remote computer.

Zoho One is excellent. I highly recommend. TeamViewer is nothing special, although it works (well) as it should. Cancellation policy is that you must notify them 28 days before renewal. I got locked in when I found out we were renewing - there is NO NOTIFICATION that your renewal is coming up (outside of 28 days).

Team Viewer seems to access and open a remote session a bit more quickly than Splashtop. However, in using Splashtop, so far it has met our needs adequately, and for a much better ROI than Team Viewer.

Reliability and constant connection was what set it apart. I dont even think it has any direct competitor since none of the other tools I used had the option to leave the software running and maintain a constant connection.

One of our main clients has restrictions on the browser choice and what plugins can be added so that removed Chrome as an option. TeamViewer is standalone and while it is paid, the client doesn’t need to pay for their side so you can install it on multiple client machines. It’s also really easy to use across platforms and I can have multiple connections open at the same time.

Team Viewer is easier to use. Screen Connect offers a much better white label option. If your clients are going to have access to their remote computers as well, I recommend Screen Connect. If your team is the only one who needs access to remote computers, I recommend Team Viewer. That's how we do it anyway.

Ease of use to get up and running. Setup is simple and includes feature that meant the most to me. The flexibility to have challenged and unchallenged access was important for my clients. Simple and straight forward to use, requires little training and documentation to implement and support for staff and customers alike. Have used it in the past to support non tech staff, as well as providing limited remote access to training systems.

I use the above-mentioned options when there is a need for connecting on a lower bandwidth internet or if the budget is stringent. Two more good alternatives I use are: AnyDesk and Ammyy Admin which works great. I wonder why these two software packages are not available in the list of options here.

TeamViewer was chosen for its simplicity, security, and definitely, the reliability of the product. It is a reference in remote access software and hardly suffers from any technical problem. It is also a familiar tool that all support staff have worked hard on and know very well. Support, in case of a problem, is very good and recommended as well.

My organization found it better just because we have a fewer number of people using it. All the remote connection provider tools are costly in the market and all of them have their flaws here and there.

TeamViewer is far better than all the other solutions because of its robust services. Its constant updates keep it ready for all the new challenges and tech advancement. Thus, after investing in TeamViewer we are certain to have all the new features available in one solution.

TeamViewer is much better than the above products, as it does a better job with support.

The TeamViewer software was chosen because it is a tool I've used for years and I'm very familiar with. I also had recommendations from other members and everyone voted for this software for the support team to use. It is a tool with few bugs and defects and always works very well its features.

It's a very different tool than these. These others can function similarly but not quite to the extent of TeamViewer in terms of functionality.

Overall pricing, functionality, and low learning curve make it a solid saas choice depending on what you need.

We use TeamViewer because it is known by everyone. The cost is appropriate for the size of our company and it is most convenient for almost all the partners and providers to collaborate with us.
But is not the only tool we use. We also use Webex. So we can not say we prefer TeamViewer over Webex, TeamViewer is just a more well know tool.

Much easier to use.

TeamViewer is at the top of the list for reliability and functionality. You can always depend on being able to connect and find the computers you are trying to access remotely.

TeamViewer has a different purpose in my company - mainly for Service Desk remote support.

I have previously worked with TightVNC, which has a clunky, out of date interface that make connections really difficult to start. For a new user, the software is likely to be off-putting. The connection handling and screen rendering result in a very slow connections with lots of lag. Teamviewer, on the other hand, has a seamless interface that compensates display quality based on broadband connection quality.