Item: Wrike
Rating: 8
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Wrike

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Wrike to manage day-to-day workload, share tasks across teams and departments, and create individual projects at a client level. We also use Wrike to manage the estimated workload, time spent, assignments, and any revisions needed for work in addition to the active workload; we have blueprints for repeatable processes and template tasks to encourage consistency.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Recurring tasks and sub-tasks.
Tracking workload and project timelines.
Combining project materials, text, and people.
Tracking resource allocation.

Cons

Tracking personal tasks and sub-tasks on one screen.
Monitoring other people's tasks.
Integration to time tracking platforms.

Return on Investment

We have been able to cut down on freelance spending as a result of managing time more effectively.
We have been able to recognize projects where we over-service.

AI and Automation

Not used much of the AI or automation, so I can't comment too much on this.

Usability

It matches that description perfectly.

Key Insights

Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?

Yes

Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Wrike again?

Yes

Likelihood to Recommend

Wrike is really well suited to our needs of managing multiple client projects at once, setting up recurring tasks, assigning across multiple teams and viewing the progress of the project against time. The collaboration options in Wrike are fantastic for us. Projects with various iterations, such as creative design, are a lesser strength, with platforms like Trello more suited to these bits of work.

Wrike Feature Ratings

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Generally satisfied with more to discover.