An efficient and easy to use solution to proofing!
Overall Satisfaction with Ziflow
We use Ziflow to upload proofs for our proofreaders to proof. We also use it for client feedback (our team members jot down the feedback through their accounts during or after meetings). Having the review process from various employees in one program keeps everything organized and flowing smoothly. In my experience, the staging function also contributes greatly to this as you can have one stage for an internal review, another for proofreading and then a final one for client.
Pros
- If your filenames are organized, the search function is a dream.
- I think the staging function makes it handy to keep things moving once one party approves.
- I think the templates are great for adding multiple people to proofs automatically.
Cons
- After big design overhauls, maybe instead of highlighting new features, old ones that may have been moved could be highlighted.
- Sometimes emails are a bit slow to receive but that could be a problem on our end.
- Improved efficiency and time saved in making proofs and adding people to proofs with staging and template features.
- Robust proofreading features for reviewers like comparing previous versions.
- In my experience, customer service is quick to help with issues or outages (which aren't often).
Do you think Ziflow delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Ziflow's feature set?
Yes
Did Ziflow live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Ziflow go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Ziflow again?
Yes
In my experience, previous programs offered a very bare bones proofing process. Ziflow introduced new features that make things so much easier and faster. Some features I didn't even know I wanted. No contest!


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation