Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Accelo
Score 3.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Accelo is a Professional Services Automation (PSA) platform designed to provide visibility into operational risks for service-based organizations. While traditional tools often focus on historical data, Accelo is intended to surface real-time risks such as Project Overruns, Resource Overloading, and Scope Creep. The platform integrates the full client lifecycle, including CRM, Quoting, Project Delivery, Support Ticketing, Time and Expense Tracking, Retainer Management, and…N/A
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
CMW Platform (formerly Comindware) is a business process management software centered on worklows to build automations. It implements a drag-and-drop interface along with Excel-style rules and forms.N/A
Microsoft Power Automate
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Power Automate is an advanced automation platform offering a range of features, including AI-powered automation, robotic process automation (RPA), business process automation (BPA), digital process automation (DPA), and process/task mining. The platform aims to empower organizations to securely automate their operations at scale by leveraging low-code and AI technologies.
$15
per month per user
Pricing
AcceloCMW PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Power Automate Premium
$15
per month per user
Power Automate Process
$150
per month per bot
Hosted RPA add-on
$215
per month per bot
Process Mining add-on
$5,000
per month per tenant
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AcceloCMW PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate
Free Trial
NoYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsComindware Tracker is available for purchase on a per-user subscription plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AcceloCMW PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate
Considered Multiple Products
Accelo
Chose Accelo
Harvest and Asana combined don't even scratch the surface of what Accelo can do. Harvest is nothing more than rudimentary time tracking. It's about as easy to use as they come, but it stops there. There's no tie in to project management, invoicing, capacity planning, etc. and …
Chose Accelo
Accelo is much cleaner in its UI and consolidated data quicker than Zoho Analytics.
Chose Accelo
We switched from Teamwork to Accelo. Teamwork outperforms Accelo when it comes to tasks and email communications. However, Accelo does exceed Teamwork when it comes to impeccable time management. Being able not to overspend time on a client has had a significant benefit in ROI.
Chose Accelo
Accelo doesn't really exceed any competitors in any one area of their product, but in 2015 when we made the move this was the best option that included all the tools we wanted. However, user adoption was low in some areas due to the UI, so we scaled back Accelo and added other …
Chose Accelo
We used Workfront prior to using Accelo, mainly for project management and retainer management. There is no comparison between the two as Accelo blows it away.
CMW Platform
Chose CMW Platform
When we used Nintex Workflow Automation, at the time, it was a great solution for us, since we were so deeply rooted in the SharePoint workflow models. Because of the lack of performance and simplicity, we decided to expand our horizons with CMW Platform.
Chose CMW Platform
CMW Platform is a better fit than Asana for more complex workflows. While Asana is great for simple task management, CMW Platform offers deeper customization, advanced automation and better tools for handling multi-department projects.
Chose CMW Platform
CMW platform is much better designed in terms of workflows and automation when compared to others and the integration is also seamless. Besides, we chose this tool also because of its scalability and the support they provided in trial which made our belief stronger in them. …
Chose CMW Platform
IBM Business Automation Workflow
Chose CMW Platform
I've been the longest user of ZOHO until I switched to CMW. Zoho has a better customer support and is an inexpensive option. Rest of the functionalities are more or less the same.
Chose CMW Platform
Efficient use of platform unlike process maker that gets stuck. Excellent conditions of project, document, file management and sharing. Easy to use, access, editing, updating and able to share to everyone on the organization. The best part of CMW platform is the need to a tool …
Chose CMW Platform
CMW platform is a comprehensive work management system for larger organizations whereas Wordpress is primarily designed for web content management and may not be as robust in terms of features.The platform can scale to accomadate growing content demands. Compared to …
Chose CMW Platform
We are looking for the free tariffs for few days so that maximum organizations can utilise the services and understand the need of the same before final purchase or switch to Comindware tracker
Chose CMW Platform
We selected Comindware tracker based in the suggestions made by people from my area business
Chose CMW Platform
Comindware Tracker is useful and can be accessed through a web browser on iOS and Android devices, as well as Mac and Windows desktops. It is necessary to create, implement and modify our workflows, as well as to automate
Chose CMW Platform
it's way better than notion because it make various teams collaborate on various with ease of use and with hands on more features that is actually usefull for business as it has a great and fully customizable user interface with availability for mobile platforms it's not that …
Chose CMW Platform
Visual aspect of this tool is so awesome to manage and working with different flow diagrams is a breeze which is not possible in Jira or confluence
Chose CMW Platform
We implemented Comindware Tracker since it is easy to implement and has high security features. Additionally, it has electronic form design that doesn’t require IT environment involvement.
Chose CMW Platform
Comindware Tracker requires no coding to automate even complex tasks.

Ease of implementation and usage.
Chose CMW Platform
Error management. With the latest updates, many of my processes have been negatively impacted, generating communication errors, information flow errors, shipping errors, in short, errors.
Chose CMW Platform
Quite easy to setup. Did not require much IT support during the implementation phase.
Chose CMW Platform
Other software required dedicated IT personnel to set-up, implement and monitor it. But I was able to set up Comindware Tracker myself, without the need of much technical expertise.
Chose CMW Platform
I selected Comindware Tracker because it is very user friendly, and it can also be integrated with other applications. This software is very friendly and interesting in the creation of tables and templates.
Chose CMW Platform
Comindware Tracker has an advantage over other software because of its ability to create projects without any coding skills. It is also connected to the cloud, hence it stores all the projects online. Due to Comindware Tracker having templets it is easy to form a project.
Chose CMW Platform
We were looking for a platform that would allow us to facilitate the automation of processes and tasks, it was vitally important to manage the data more safely and reliably, thus reducing costs from the hiring of intermediate personnel in distribution and production chains. …
Chose CMW Platform
Comindware is an extremely competitive software as it is web-based and could be used even in the home office environment. Its simplicity and ease of use works as an advantage and makes it stand out among other alternatives. It is definitely worth considering for company …
Chose CMW Platform
It's cheaper and easier to work with.
Microsoft Power Automate
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate is defintitely more business user friendly and citizen developer friendly. It doesn't require knowledge of Javascript, etc. Just simple drag and drop interface.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
I have evaluated Microsoft Power Automate against other workflow automation options, including Nintex, Joget, and custom-built solutions. Overall, Power Automate provided the best balance of integration, cost, speed, and governance for our needs. Power Automate is Low-code, …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
We are using Microsoft Power Automate alongside other tools, always judging the automation scenario, necessities and limitations. Compared to UiPath e. g. Microsoft Power Automate does not offer the same customizing abilities. However it is much more advanced considering the …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
In our experience, Microsoft Power Automate fails with throttling and became unusable to meet our client deadlines. Nintex did not experience throttling issues for us.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Power Automate can do many things that most platforms can't do as a 'citizen-developer' with no access to coding tools and deployment. It allows you to develop and deploy low/no-cost automation flows quickly. The blocks in Powert Automate do the API work for you, where you only …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Power Automate don't require additional license like Nintex. Also, plenty of connectors in Power Automate connect external systems and applications.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
We preferred PowerAutomate due to its integration and security within the M365 suite which our business was already using.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
SharePoint Designer was discontinued and was limited in functionality, being as old as it was. Nintex was powerful, but at the time we were using it, it was primarilly tied to SharePoint, and we wanted to do more outside of SharePoint as well. And Tibco Integration (Scribe) was …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Firstly, it came with organizational license, so it was available to everyone, for some of the automations that we're not able to do so when we took license for other tools it was more difficult and tedious to do hence, we had to shift back to Microsoft Power Automate. License …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate is worlds ahead of Zapier in so many ways. The looping, DOM access, and flow controls are much better. I feel that accessing different data within previous connectors used in a flow is much easier in Microsoft Power Automate as well.

The custom …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
The Microsoft Power Automate have the browser based access which doesn't require any tool installation separately. Whereas for the Uipath, many dependencies are needed for the flows. We need to purchase the separate License for the UiPath but in case of the Power Automate, it …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
I have only used Microsoft Power Automate as our organization is using microsoft ecosystem and i can access its features easily. With new features it is sufficient enough for my use as if now. I would recommend it for those who are in microsoft ecosystem to use it is capable …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
I have many years of experience with Nintex applications and it stands up very well against Microsoft Power Automate. I hope Microsoft Power Automate can become the better workflow application. With the Integrated AI builder and continuous updates I expect they can become the …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
We migrated from Flow. They only other we have used is Sharepoint workflows and Power Automate is miles ahead of that.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
easy to use, easy to adopt
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
earlier we have used UiPath Automation Platform .Later we have used Microsoft Power Automate for below reasons
1.Accessibility
2.Microsoft Integration
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
  1. Power Automate beats UiPath basically from a costing perspective. I prefer Power Automate over UiPath because of its different costing segments that make it way cheaper than UiPath.
  2. SmartSheet provides a number of functions when it comes to dealing with and showcasing tabular …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
User Interface and Ease of Use, Integration Capabilities, Bot Development, Cognitive Services and AI Integration, Scalability, Pricing, Community and Support. The most thing that Power Automate stands out from others is the Pricing models as it is way more cheap than Automation …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
UIPath allows for automation of saving email attachments but the time required to create this automation is a great deal longer than Microsoft Power Automate.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate is a Low-Code,No-Code approach making it easy for a beginner to learn and understand. The integration with microsoft ecosystem is an advantage. The cost is less when compared to uipath. There are pre built templates available and the AI integration is …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate is the platform we can say very user friendly You need not to know the coding and programme you just need to enter the flow you wanted and you are set . You no need lengthy program and eventually no time is required. Very productive tool we are using …
Best Alternatives
AcceloCMW PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate
Small Businesses
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com
Score 8.4 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 8.5 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 8.5 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AcceloCMW PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AcceloCMW PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate
Likelihood to Recommend
The best services management, easy operations reporting, and data analytics features from Accelo are impressive and easy on data visualization and workflow management software. Accelo was very helpful in collaboration and easy to collect feedback from integrated platforms and the scheduling ability is very unique. The Automation tools are also cost-effective and the ability to manage time through Accelo is perfect.
Read full review
CMW has less integration capabilities, this is something that can definitely be improved in the future. On a side note, the MS Outlook integration option is excellent. The UI is decent for its purpose and the platform is well suited for a range of business requirements - customer order management, document tracking and approval management. You name it, they have it.
Read full review
Very useful RPA tools for automating processes with minimal coding and drag-and-drop functionality, with a wide variety of triggers, including scheduled time-based triggers and activity-based triggers, such as modifying a file/list in SharePoint to run a Power Automate flow. Very easy-to-use UI with native integration with every Microsoft product, and a very low automation failure rate for deployed workflows.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracking customer interactions. Nice integration with G Suite, could be a lot better if they acknowledged that contacts may actually have more than one email address.
  • Support Ticket system is integrated, so we can view support history and other email correspondence easily. It's cheaper that Zendesk.
  • Support is reasonably good, usually prompt and responsive.
  • Constant development - lots of updates, just not often to areas that we use.
Read full review
  • Flexibility in our workflow automation. It’s easy to modify the existing processes when the need arises
  • Web forms creation without a single line of code
  • The parallel approval mechanism allows sending work items to a group rather than a single person
Read full review
  • Sending confirmation email to clients and user once the flow is triggered.
  • Fetching or Dumping files from one location to another if the flow is triggered.
  • Schedule flow helps to send alerts and triggers the flow at a specific interval of time to carry out the required task.
  • Power Automate also be used to convert any file format to a specific file format and save it to the required location
Read full review
Cons
  • The client portal needs to be improved. It does not have the same user interface as we have within Accelo and we get a lot of client complaints about it.
  • It needs more executive-style reporting and the ability to create your own reports and filters.
  • It needs to be faster. With all of the things Accelo is doing to give you all the data, it is kind of slow compared to other systems in the browser.
Read full review
  • I would like to see Comindware Tracker come in a free pricing tier.
  • I would like to see Comindware Tracker offer more granular roles to be assigned to workflow users.
  • I would like to see Comindware Tracker integrate with more ERP systems and to offer more import/export/migration capabilities from other workflow management systems.
Read full review
  • Steep learning curve.
  • It can be slow to develop simple solutions compared to other automation platforms such as Smarsheet.
  • Troubleshooting and developing can be frustrating without proper access to edit the code directly.
  • Only able to edit through the GUI and with expressions.
  • Many ways to do the same thing can be frustrating when you need to rework your flow.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Looking forward to seeing more refinement of features provided and upcoming features promised :)
Read full review
Very likely.
Read full review
Power Automate is a great product that has a vast array of options on how to use it. Your imagination is the only hurdle with using Power Automate as there is no limit to what can be done with the system. It has brought a lot of value to our business through the use of custom systems, connectors, and streamlining processes.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
As I mentioned in my whole review that it is making opration smoother it's capabilities to automate repetitive tasks, reduce manual errors,and improve productivity.Its low code approach allows us to create business apps quickly and easily without requiring extensibe programming knowledge.although it has lots of positive points but there are some issues which is barrier to become perfect that's why I give 8
Read full review
Power Automate features a clean and intuitive user interface that allows users to create, manage, and monitor workflows easily. The UI is designed to be accessible to both technical and non-technical users, with drag-and-drop functionality for building workflows. Power Automate supports integration with a wide range of Microsoft and third-party applications. This flexibility in integration allows users to automate workflows across various systems, enhancing overall productivity and efficiency.
Read full review
Support Rating
From the beginning the Accelo team has been very invested in ensuring our success and overall happiness with the platform. The initial implementation specialists and trainers did a fairly good job of learning our company and needs, and tried to tailor the trainings accordingly. However, once we made the formal switch to the platform, meaning we no longer were using our legacy systems, we found that we had a lot of questions....and a lot of ideas and recommendations. The support team is extremely responsive and seemingly happy to receive our continual feedback. And if we encounter an issue that seems to be a system issue, they work diligently to fix it (we've actually had an engineer join a call with us to learn of the issue - and subsequently fix it)
Read full review
It's more of drag and drop functionality. It is quite easy to set up. Creation of form is very easy. Support Team of Comindware Tracker is good and very friendly. It is efficient in terms of task management, project management, team management, vendor/client tracking.
Read full review
both Community support and Microsoft official support typically respond to (and resolve) reported issues in a VERY expedient manner, usually going above and beyond for education and bugfixing. I have been thoroughly impressed with the level of support I had been provided in the past.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
after reviewing the main features of Power Automate, the Microsoft trainer focused on some of our real life use cases implementation, from simple to more advanced.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
although it was productive, it is more difficult to stay focused and in a 7 hours a day online training (including screen share issues and the fact that the trainer just can't precisely show the exact location of your mistake)
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
I was part of the migration of classic SharePoint workflows and Nintex workflows. We didn't spend much time learning the new platform because of its user-friendly interface and intuitive drag-and-drop functionality. We have mostly O365 E1 and E3 licensed users, so they can participate in our Citizen Development program and utilize Power Automate to build day-to-day business processes.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Harvest and Asana combined don't even scratch the surface of what Accelo can do. Harvest is nothing more than rudimentary time tracking. It's about as easy to use as they come, but it stops there. There's no tie in to project management, invoicing, capacity planning, etc. and the reporting isn't great. Asana we found to be very difficult to use for complex projects with multiple deliverables, multiple deadlines, multiple teams - and it didn't tie back to budgets and hours worked. So the deficiencies of those two tools are what led us to Accelo. In terms of more comparable systems, I had previously used Workamajig. The sophistication of Workamajig was there, but it didn't seem to have quite as much flexibility and customization. ProWorkflow we evaluated just based on sales and marketing information available on the platform and felt it wasn't quite as good.
Read full review
When we used Nintex Workflow Automation, at the time, it was a great solution for us, since we were so deeply rooted in the SharePoint workflow models. Because of the lack of performance and simplicity, we decided to expand our horizons with CMW Platform.
Read full review
I have evaluated Microsoft Power Automate against other workflow automation options, including Nintex, Joget, and custom-built solutions. Overall, Power Automate provided the best balance of integration, cost, speed, and governance for our needs. Power Automate is Low-code, rapid development, minimal maintenance, faster changes, and iteration. Compared with Nintex, Power Automate has a strong workflow designer, lower licensing and operational costs, a separate vendor ecosystem, but Power Automate has Native Microsoft 365 integration, included or incremental licensing, and a strong roadmap with AI and Copilot.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Save Money on Lost Time. You won't go over your client retainers in any given month if you use Accelo properly. This ultimately saves your company time and money.
  • Lost or Broken Communications. They need to get it together with their email system, aka "request inboxes" ... There are too many lost or broken emails for them to be trustworthy with this. My suggestion is to make sure you know everyone you communicate with (including outside sources like Google or other companies) and set them up in Accelo, then send test emails. Also, when in doubt, use your Outlook or other primary sourced email when you want to make sure an email goes through with all appropriate files.
Read full review
  • Reducing time managing tasks and projects by automating workforce without involving manual procedures.
  • Sequential and parallel creation of process steps and multichannel models.
  • Drag and drop capability ease web form designs that are easy to export to MS Excel and Word.
Read full review
  • Automating emails for finance and payroll has not only saved hours of work for those departments but lowers the risk of human error.
  • Creating workflows and approvals for our goals and bonus system has saved everyone in the organization hours of manual work and MATH!
Read full review
ScreenShots

Accelo Screenshots

Screenshot of project analytics. Accelo keeps projects on track with templates, task management, Gantt charts, AI-predicted completion dates, portfolio views, and built-in client approvals.Screenshot of the scheduling interface. Accelo matches work to the right person by skill, workload, and availability — with utilization reports, capacity forecasting, and dynamic allocations that keep delivery and pipeline aligned.Screenshot of the revenue dashboard. Revenue leakage hides in unbilled hours, missed scope, and late invoices. Accelo captures time automatically, tracks budget and margin live, automates invoicing end-to-end, and manages retainers and scope creep before the damage is done.Screenshot of an overview of capacity. Most firms make decisions on data that's already a month old. Accelo delivers real-time reporting across utilization, profitability, and project financials — with custom dashboards that give every role the signal they need to act.

CMW Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of Graphical Workflow BuilderScreenshot of Drag'n'drop Web-form DesignerScreenshot of Collaboration toolsScreenshot of Workflow automationScreenshot of Workflow trackingScreenshot of Outlook intergration

Microsoft Power Automate Screenshots

Screenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Work Queues, Initial pageScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Signed-in web portal home pageScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Signed-in web portal create pageScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Desktop designerScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Hosted RPAScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Display of DLP violations (on Run)