Acoustic Content (formerly IBM Watson Content Hub) vs Adobe Experience Manager

• It has a wide variety of built-in API calls.
• Building unique pages is simple and straightforward and requires only basic fundamental knowledge to get started.
• More advanced API calls can be developed simply.

Read full review

• Content and assets are managed effectively with AEM, which allows team members to utilize this content effectively.
• Moreover, as it is part of the Adobe suite, its integration with other Adobe products such as ACS is very easy and effective, compared with others.
• Components availability

Read full review

• It doesn't work well with our IBM systems and as you might expect, that seems to be a common problem with IBM products.
• Application settings are bad and some items are easily accessible and can be buried in menus

Read full review

• The new Touch UI interface could use a lot of improvement. Many of it is smaller detail items/features, but when using the system extensively it can become cumbersome.
• There is a bit of a learning curve because of the depth of what Adobe Experience Manager can do. Even basic editing and page creation, while relatively simple at the most basic level, is not as intuitive and easy to use as other systems like Wordpress.
• Development can be complicated. Although I've not personally done much in terms of dev work, my experience and what I've heard from my colleagues indicates that there are some complexities that make it not as easy to develop in as other systems.
• The source edit option within the rich text editor does not include syntax coloring for the code, or even a different serif/monospaced font. It is the same sans serif font as the regular rich text, which makes it hard to read.

Read full review

• Approved developer is a simple tool for integrating other end-user applications.
• It has allowed us to have one-stop-shop and easy-to-use debugging, saving time.

Read full review

• We have been able to meet our first objective of rolling out a site to replace our current Students site well within time parameters
• We were able to deploy the site to replace our County Offices within three months, and the users have been able to turn out acceptable content

Read full review