Acronis True Image vs. Bacula Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Acronis True Image
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Acronis True Image is a backup, cloning, cyber protection and privacy tool suite for home users.N/A
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Bacula Enterprise is a data center backup, restore, and recovery solution from Swiss, Dracula-themed software company Bacula Systems.N/A
Pricing
Acronis True ImageBacula Enterprise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Acronis True ImageBacula Enterprise
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Acronis True ImageBacula Enterprise
Considered Both Products
Acronis True Image
Chose Acronis True Image
Acronis provides all in one solutions for cyber security like it protects data(Antimalware and vulraneblity scanners), Backup data and also recover data also use for data privacy that will encrypt data backup for unauthorized use of sensitive data. Acronics also provides full …
Chose Acronis True Image
Acronis fits in with the rest of our software as it saves us a ton of time and money. Usability is incredibly intuitive - and a new employee can be taught the ins and outs in less than 15 minutes. The software is also updated regularly to improve the security and functionality …
Chose Acronis True Image
Protects all of local PC resources as well as cloud and web services for small business at a good value price.

Has similar functionality with rolling all products into one central site manager which allows you to do backups, file restoration as well as endpoint protection with …
Chose Acronis True Image
I liked the CrashPlan interface but it was somewhat complex and the product was discontinued for my category of use.
Chose Acronis True Image
We used SpiderOak for a while, but when we had a massive data failure, we figured out that it is very difficult to download a past version of your data set (ie, download all data, as of two days ago - If I remember correctly, you had to do it folder by folder). Thankfully, I …
Chose Acronis True Image
iDrive is incredibly faster than Acronis on cloud backup. After Acronis' failures on cloud storage I moved to iDrive for peace of mind. iDrive can also do local backups, and either variant of system state, server, outlook, exchange, etc. It does not however have the ability to …
Chose Acronis True Image
CrashPlan no longer provides software for local backups so I have migrated away from them. They still remain a viable alternative if cloud backups are important. Unfortunately, cloud solutions in ATI are fairly limited in offerings. ATI also has a slightly easier learning curve …
Chose Acronis True Image
Overall, Acronis has been my preferred full backup product. This is due in large part to my positive experiences with it over the years, where I was able to successfully recover both files and full systems when the
Chose Acronis True Image
I use another backup product for Windows previously but it went out of business and discontinued their support and even stopped the work of running copies of their product. I am using AWS backup. AWS backup is useful for specific files you can store on the cloud. I am using …
Chose Acronis True Image
It's more targeted on single deployments and you can backup multiple PCs if you need to, also the imaging software is the best, paid solution. Veeam can compare but I think it is on a different feature set than Acronis TI.
Chose Acronis True Image
I chose Acronis True Image in addition to QuickBooks' built-in online backup because I have had that service fail from time to time without any notice so I don't trust it to safeguard our data by itself.
Chose Acronis True Image
Even though it worked, still preferred the paid product because it performed better and was more reliable. Acronis has a well established name and reputation. When I started using it back in 2009, I used it as a free/eval product and because it worked so well then, I decided to …
Chose Acronis True Image
Acronis True Image is easier to use, faster, and more reliable than other PC backup solutions I have used in the past.
Chose Acronis True Image
Acronis was selected after someone's recommendation. Having used a variety of other products in the past, with mixed results felt it was time for something new. I now recommend this product to others. It is virtually foolproof. You can't go wrong with Acronis. It's that …
Chose Acronis True Image
Acronis is steadily moving toward the functionality of Time Machine without having to own a Mac. I chose True Image based on my experience with other Acronis software -- namely Disk Director. DD has worked miracles and allows the user to test different actions without …
Chose Acronis True Image
Macrium Reflect is another software that I have tried, a few years back. I find Acronis True Image more intuitive and easy to learn.
Chose Acronis True Image
  • This is better than Ghost - lighter images and faster.
  • Acronis True Image is the best imaging software currently on the market.
  • Can restore computer failure within some minutes.
Bacula Enterprise
Chose Bacula Enterprise
During the choice, Bacula Enterprise proved to be more versatile and affordable, the diversity of plugins was also important for the decision, it was one of the only solutions that work with tape, the possibility of sizing the server according to the need and freedom of Choice …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
The determining factor was the migration of old backup data from the Community version to a new backup platform. We didn't have the initial resources to restore all the backup data, install the new solution on existing hardware, and then back up again. This would directly …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Bacula cost-benefit ratio is better than all the others, as in addition to having many more integrations with operating systems and hypervisors, it is not necessary to purchase more licenses for backups such as NAS, File to Tape, Cloud, etc.
Chose Bacula Enterprise
No longer have the impression of enriching shareholders or pension funds. No longer having to update the software every month.
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise supports more systems and is free software.has plugin for postgres, oracle, windows and all linuxwhile HYCU only supports NUTANIX and backs up the entire VM, not very good compression software.Hycu has a closed architecture, I can't complain about the graphics …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise was selected by us in comparison to other software, due to its high performance, data reliability and mainly cost-benefit, a software of great scalability and performance for a low cost, it represents for the company a greater profit and a security of data …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Data Protector was a confusing tool for configuration. There wasn't much research source for doubts. The tool was not intuitive. Problems understanding the initial configuration of the tool made maintenance difficult. Bacula Enterprise is totally different, as it has an …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
We are a data recovery company and we use to receive backup media from several backup systems from the market when the original software can't restore them after data storage accidents or for some other different reasons. Bacula Enterprise is the only software that we never had …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
The guarantee of restoration and security of the company's data, and the possibility of data backup with greater capacity at a lower cost, both in the acquisition of the license and in the annual payments for the guarantee of support and updates is why Bacula Enterprise stacks …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Micro Focus Data Protector has a poor support service and there is no active community, the user interface is not intuitive and the cost-benefit ratio of the solution is much lower than that of the Bacula system backup solution, in my opinion.
Chose Bacula Enterprise
The possibility of increasing the amount of data to be saved without having to pay more for the license was one of the things that led us to choose Bacula, but when effectively testing the tool, it became clear that in addition to the financial benefit, we would also have a …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Both tools are of great quality, however the investment in Bacula Enterprise is much lower, due to not having to license each backup client. In addition, it is clear to be multi-environment, and can be used in different systems and scenarios through its plugins. These can even …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Lower cost of the tool, no limitation of backup data, and plugins compatible with the type of services we have in our data center.
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise has a much more intuitive interface, better performance, and more data backup capacity at a lower price.
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Although it is a well-known and robust solution, it didn't work for us. Bad console, the bad solution to manage, few integrations, very expensive, poor support, that is, it was not difficult to decide on the exchange. In addition to the bad experience to make a DR of the …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Veeam Backup & Replication is easy to use and powerful, but I really didn't like that it's closed-source (Bacula Enterprise is open source--you pay for support), so I have no way of looking into what it's doing. Veeam only runs on Windows, and is more focused on VMs; our …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Unlike other backup and restore tool options, Bacula Enterprise offers much more functionality, in addition to a centralized management platform. For large corporations that have more than one virtualization host, it is essential to have a robust tool that has no limitations. …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
The way of hiring Bacula is simpler than the other market options. There is no limitation by amount of data or the like, and there are several plugins that increase the possibilities of the tool.
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Já usávamos o Bacula Community e decidimos contratar o Bacula Enterprise pois os backups já estavam em um padrão aberto sendo de fácil migração.Outros aspectos nos levaram a contratação:Suporte em caso de algum desastre;Possibilidade de contratação de plugins a aplicações como …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
We started using Bacula Community Edition back in 2011 and took advantage of Bacula's selective migration plan in 2014 to move to the Enterprise Edition. This move came about after our technical team decided to conduct a formal review of its backup and recovery requirements, …
Chose Bacula Enterprise
Veritas Backup Exec and Veritas NetBackup
Chose Bacula Enterprise
I have just always used Bacula, it's been great. I have not used much software at this scale since Legatto or Veritas Volume Manager. I'm sure there are other great products out there, but Bacula was easy for me to implement since I'm well versed in Linux.
Chose Bacula Enterprise
One big point was the support for operating on a Linux machine. Second, the possibility of a PoC with excellent and honest support.
Another big point was Bacula not being charged by gigabyte/terabyte, but by the number of machines being backed-up.
Features
Acronis True ImageBacula Enterprise
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Acronis True Image
-
Ratings
Bacula Enterprise
9.4
Ratings
11% above category average
Universal recovery00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Instant recovery00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Business application protection00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Snapshots00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Management dashboard00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Retention options00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Acronis True ImageBacula Enterprise
Small Businesses
NetBackup Flex Appliances
NetBackup Flex Appliances
Score 10.0 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
IBM Cloud Backup
IBM Cloud Backup
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Acronis True ImageBacula Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Acronis True ImageBacula Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
The imaging capability seems to be solid [with Acronis True Image], although I have not had to recover a drive yet so cannot compare. The logs tell me when it is (and isn't) working. The "Cloud Replication" that is supposed to simultaneously replicate the
local backup image is perfectly awful and the months of tech support
ended with them telling me I had a "VSS issue" on a brand new workstation
and that I should just create a separate cloud image. After months of it
taking 3-4 DAYS to run, IF it worked, and then failing altogether, I discontinued it. It was even logging (running?) under another separate critical files backup, and forced to use the same encryption password. Setting up a new one failed. The cloud backup of my critical
files is still running at kb/sec speeds. The ransomware protection hasn't caught anything yet to my knowledge, and consumes a lot of resources. Changing the settings takes at least 10 minutes to log into the cloud. Cloud storage is tiny and a push to get you to pay more. Will not be renewing.
Read full review
Well suited: - I use it for on premise and cloud backup and recovery and it is excellent for this job. - I also experiment with different hypervisors and till now Bacula seems to work with all of them - Security is really important for me as I had many bad experiences in the past and Bacula solution makes me totally confident. Less appropriate - You need to be experienced Linux user, I had to learn few more things in system to make the best use of it. - It's definitely designed for scalability and bigger companies than mine
Read full review
Pros
  • Delta backup makes backups super fast of larger files that do not change in its entirety (e.g. VM images, large PSD files)
  • Easy to use (set it and forget it)
  • Rescue media makes it easy to restore backups to different hardware and migrate to other work stations
  • Lots of backup options on the Windows version of ATI
Read full review
  • The support services provided by Bacula Systems are superb. They usually respond extremely quickly and have clear and useful answers upfront, which is a welcome change. Their support enabled us to get Bacula Enterprise up and running quickly and well configured, in a relatively short period of time. In addition, they also offer proactive support on a yearly basis. This involves sending an automatically generated report on your system configuration and status from which they provide advice on any issues or configuration problems that they find. I haven't seen this level of proactive support from another company.
  • The configuration is extremely powerful and flexible. If you're used to dealing with text-based configuration files then you'll find this system familiar. It also fits well with configuration management tools - in our case, Puppet - allowing the configuration across the whole system to be managed centrally. The flexibility of the system allowed us to have backups running exactly when and how we wanted, performing staging to tape via disk, and with various admin, tasks to automate the handling of tapes within our tape library.
  • The command-line console tool allows all operations to be done from the command line. In an emergency situation, or stuck in a datacentre with only a dumb console, being able to do everything via the command line is an important feature to have.
  • Bweb is an optional extra that provides a web-based interface for both management and configuration. If you don't want to edit text files and use the command line console tool then Bweb is the best interface to use. We don't use it for configuration (favoring external tools for managing the text-based configuration), but we do use it to monitor backups and perform restores. It provides an excellent overview of what's happening with the system.
  • The manuals, whitepapers, and additional documentation cover everything in detail. The whitepapers give a good overview of the installation, concepts, and specific scenarios, whilst the manuals cover in more depth how specific areas work and how the configuration is handled. It's very easy to find out what a particular option means and does.
  • The software can run on and is supported on, a wide variety of operating systems, including Ubuntu which is what we use. This is a level of flexibility that was important to us after being tied to RHEL for our previous backup system.
Read full review
Cons
  • Upon a system restore after a crash, the program was able to see my server but was unable to complete the process. However, once I copied everything to a detachable USB hard disk, it had no further problems.
  • I'd love to see an exact copy of the functionality of Time Machine, except on a PC. Seamless, nearly flawless. It's already pretty decent, though.
  • Okay, Acronis, you've knocked it out of the park already, but ...it's time to offer some hardware! Develop your own secure version of the Time Capsule that can be plugged into the network. It will only do one thing, and it will be the best at what it does.
Read full review
  • Takes a while to get used to the software. It's not something that you can just install and work away with. You need to figure it out first. We did get a free training course when we purchased the Bacula Enterprise version which we found very useful.
  • Support Documentation is very in depth but it's a tough read sometimes. Takes a while to understand the concepts from this documentation. Could do with making the documentation a small bit easier to understand.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Easy to use, proactive and effective customer support, and simple deployment method. The high configurability is what makes this tool so effective for my organization - at no point do I have any issues of trust as to the restorability of a fileset. The GUI provided gives clear actionable reports as to the effectivity of the jobs performed.
Read full review
Usability
Protect my system from data loss and also can manage multiple devices via online cloud from any where and also can set Multifactor authentication for more secure login access. Archive any backup which will use less space and we can transfer it to any other space also so it is very easy as server admin to manage acronics utilities
Read full review
It still has a lot of flaws to overcome, especially in the area of user friendliness. Searching and filtering is quite cumbersome. Once you find the job you from which you want to restore, be sure to write that job number down because you won't be able to quickly find the job again without it during a recovery.
Read full review
Performance
Backups run fast and no significant performance issues other than the ones discussed previously.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have never had an issue with their software and therefore have never had to reach out to their support for anything. I have however used their online help to answer questions about functionality. I found no issues getting the information I was looking for. It seemed that if their own support didn't have the answer, there was a user on their forums who did.
Read full review
We have always been very well served by Bacula Enterprise support. The response time is excellent, and any doubts or problems are resolved quickly and easily, avoiding complications and the evolution of problems that could arise. Only praise for Bacula Enterprise's service and support. The monitoring of the entire process from acquisition to implementation was very well done.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The professor understood the tool very well, it was a fact that he had mastery over the system and knew what he was talking about, clearing up all doubts and passing on all the necessary knowledge so that we could handle Bacula Enterprise in our organization.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Bacula Systems and especially Bacula Brazil were extremely attentive and served us very well, making all implementations or changes work perfectly
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Acronis fits in with the rest of our software as it saves us a ton of time and money. Usability is incredibly intuitive - and a new employee can be taught the ins and outs in less than 15 minutes. The software is also updated regularly to improve the security and functionality of the suite.
Read full review
The possibility of increasing the amount of data to be saved without having to pay more for the license was one of the things that led us to choose Bacula, but when effectively testing the tool, it became clear that in addition to the financial benefit, we would also have a backup reliable and robust.
Read full review
Scalability
The Windows version is generally reliable and only ran into one issue thus far. Restores are easy and there are many features. On MacOS, it's a completely different story. There is significant resource leakage related to the updater app that can bog down part of a CPU core continuously until it is disabled. The mobile backup feature also needs to be disabled via UNIX command line or CPU usage will go up when a mobile device on the same network like an iPad or iPhone's screen is turned on.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Helped me to recover both internal and client systems from complete system failure in a timely manner.
  • Helped me to recover internal and client data that had become corrupt or inadvertently deleted.
  • Consequently, this has on many occasions reduced business down time, which is critical.
Read full review
  • What price can you put on recovery? The very first time we had to restore from backup, having Bacula Enterprise support paid for itself.
  • The extremely good visibility into Bacula Enterprise's operations--as opposed to some competitors where you don't really know what it's doing--makes me trust it more.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Acronis True Image Screenshots

Screenshot of data control, which supports backup in just two clicks, and all data and backup information is displayed in one placeScreenshot of a display of the data that is backed up, the number of backup versions in storage, and how many photos, videos, music and documents that are available to restore.