The Adobe Experience Platform is a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) serving as the foundation of the Adobe Experience Cloud, and is provided as a customer experience management platform with real-time customer profiles, continuous intelligence, and an open and extensible architecture that enables delivering personalized experiences at scale.
N/A
Amperity
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Amperity, headquartered in Seattle, offers their customer data platform, supporting raw data ingestion from all sources of customer data, identity resolution driven by AI, and delivery of enriched customer data to the marketing tools that need them.
N/A
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the platform-as-a-service offering provided by Amazon and designed to leverage AWS services such as Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (Amazon EC2), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3).
$35
per month
Pricing
Adobe Experience Platform
Amperity
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No Charge
$0
Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Experience Platform
Amperity
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Experience Platform
Amperity
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Features
Adobe Experience Platform
Amperity
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Experience Platform
7.0
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Amperity
-
Ratings
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
7.8
28 Ratings
1% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.018 Ratings
Scalability
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.028 Ratings
Platform management overhead
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.027 Ratings
Workflow engine capability
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.022 Ratings
Platform access control
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.027 Ratings
Services-enabled integration
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.027 Ratings
Development environment creation
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.027 Ratings
Development environment replication
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.028 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.027 Ratings
Issue recovery
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.025 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.026 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Experience Platform
-
Ratings
Amperity
9.1
1 Ratings
10% above category average
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
-
Ratings
Tag library
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag variable mapping
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page load times
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app tagging
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of JavaScript extensions
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Experience Platform
-
Ratings
Amperity
9.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Data Management
Comparison of Customer Data Management features of Product A and Product B
The Adobe Experience Platform is well suited for companies that are maturing or have matured in their digital offerings and are looking for very sophisticated tools to elevate to the next level. It's also for well resourced teams, both financially and head count to take advantage of the deep functionality and integrations.
I think Custora is a great fit for B2C companies that are trying to take their relationship marketing programs to the next level and outside of basic segmentation. It's a great platform to consolidate all customer, order history, and campaign history type data into one platform to obtain a 360 degree view of the customer. Additionally I would say, if an organization is resource constrained from an analytics perspective, the platform also makes great sense to invest in. It provides out of the box predictive analytics, and custom lifecycle triggers to align a retention marketing program around. Outside of the upfront work to get the platform up and running, it's very marketer friendly to utilize
I have been using AWS Elastic Beanstalk for more than 5 years, and it has made our life so easy and hassle-free. Here are some scenarios where it excels -
I have been using different AWS services like EC2, S3, Cloudfront, Serverless, etc. And Elastic Beanstalk makes our lives easier by tieing each service together and making the deployment a smooth process.
N number of integrations with different CI/CD pipelines make this most engineer's favourite service.
Scalability & Security comes with the service, which makes it the absolute perfect product for your business.
Personally, I haven't found any situations where it's not appropriate for the use cases it can be used. The pricing is also very cost-effective.
Getting a project set up using the console or CLI is easy compared to other [computing] platforms.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk supports a variety of programming languages so teams can experiment with different frameworks but still use the same compute platform for rapid prototyping.
Common application architectures can be referenced as patterns during project [setup].
Multiple environments can be deployed for an application giving more flexibility for experimentation.
Limited to the frameworks and configurations that AWS supports. There is no native way to use Elastic Beanstalk to deploy a Go application behind Nginx, for example.
It's not always clear what's changed on an underlying system when AWS updates an EB stack; the new version is announced, but AWS does not say what specifically changed in the underlying configuration. This can have unintended consequences and result in additional work in order to figure out what changes were made.
As our technology grows, it makes more sense to individually provision each server rather than have it done via beanstalk. There are several reasons to do so, which I cannot explain without further diving into the architecture itself, but I can tell you this. With automation, you also loose the flexibility to morph the system for your specific needs. So if you expect that in future you need more customization to your deployment process, then there is a good chance that you might try to do things individually rather than use an automation like beanstalk.
Overall I really like the Adobe Experience Cloud after a couple years of figuring out various tools. They are extremely powerful. The time commitment to learn them is high since it's not a tool you can easily begin using without much training.
The overall usability is good enough, as far as the scaling, interactive UI and logging system is concerned, could do a lot better when it comes to the efficiency, in case of complicated node logics and complicated node architectures. It can have better software compatibility and can try to support collaboration with more softwares
Adobe has support at all levels and for each product but beyond tool questions you'll often be told they can help but it requires some paid consulting hours. So you either hire Adobe consultants or find 3rd part consultants who know their products well.
As I described earlier it has been really cost effective and really easy for fellow developers who don't want to waste weeks and weeks into learning and manually deploying stuff which basically takes month to create and go live with the Minimal viable product (MVP). With AWS Beanstalk within a week a developer can go live with the Minimal viable product easily.
- Do as many experiments as you can before you commit on using beanstalk or other AWS features. - Keep future state in mind. Think through what comes next, and if that is technically possible to do so. - Always factor in cost in terms of scaling. - We learned a valuable lesson when we wanted to go multi-region, because then we realized many things needs to change in code. So if you plan on using this a lot, factor multiple regions.
Amperitiy's data model is much more refined compared to the competition which makes it ideal for firms looking for a no-nonsense CDP. However, it lacks campaigns and delivery features when compared to some other CDP providers like mParticle and Clevertap. The pricing is good and the usage-based pricing ensures that even small to mid-sized teams can afford it. Support can be improved though.
We also use Heroku and it is a great platform for smaller projects and light Node.js services, but we have found that in terms of cost, the Elastic Beanstalk option is more affordable for the projects that we undertake. The fact that it sits inside of the greater AWS Cloud offering also compels us to use it, since integration is simpler. We have also evaluated Microsoft Azure and gave up trying to get an extremely basic implementation up and running after a few days of struggling with its mediocre user interface and constant issues with documentation being outdated. The authentication model is also badly broken and trying to manage resources is a pain. One cannot compare Azure with anything that Amazon has created in the cloud space since Azure really isn't a mature platform and we are always left wanting when we have to interface with it.
Overall we have been able to increase the mix of triggered related revenue in email from 20% to 50% of total revenue after implementing Custora's lifecycle triggers
We've also seen one off email tests with incremental conversion rates up to 75% when utilizing Custora personas to personal communications