Airship vs. Bound

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Airship
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The Airship Experience Platform provides an end-to-end solution for unifying experiences across channels and capturing value across the entire customer lifecycle.N/A
Bound
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Bound (formerly Get Smart Content) is a website segmentation and targeting platform that enables marketers to read a website visitor's digital body language and serve relevant content based on the person's stage in the buying journey. Using behavioral, demographic, and firmographic data, Bound creates personalized web experiences for both anonymous and known website visitors to increase the effectiveness of marketing efforts and dramatically reduce the buyer's path to conversion. Bound partners…N/A
Pricing
AirshipBound
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AirshipBound
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AirshipBound
Considered Both Products
Airship
Chose Airship
They are the only Application/Push vendor we have used since I started w/ the company about 4 years ago. I believe we have sued them since 2016 or so.
Chose Airship
Airship allows for more uses for a better value and is more of a focused outreach for the parishioners, and much easier to use with mobile devises.
Chose Airship
We've tested a bunch of different CRM tools over the years and Airship has been a winner for its functionality, features, cost, and ability to integrate with other softwares that we use. It has been great for SMS and mobile in particular. It could certainly be a one stop shop …
Chose Airship
Airship have a very different set of features, we could not find an exact match of it.
Chose Airship
Easy user interface and seamless integration. Great Customer engagement
Chose Airship
Airship allows for more uses for a better value and is more of a focused outreach for the parishioners, and much easier to use with mobile devises.
Chose Airship
We use Sailthru for emails. We have not used them for pushes so I can't compare the two.
Chose Airship
The above mentioned products were evaluated for initial RFQ process however Airship was awarded for the robustness and ease of use, and its strategy aligns with Vodafone's App usage engagement
Chose Airship
Airship is superb in customer support against all others. Even though I feel CleverTap may be a better choice but probably will not be as easy as Airship when setting them up and operating it. As for MoEngage, the last experience I had was simply not good enough, but that was …
Chose Airship
I have also worked with Vibes, Salesforce, Pendo, and Swrve for mobile app marketing efforts, and I always come back to airship as delivering the best Push and In-App messaging capabilities. If you want a full service platform for Push and In-App messaging rather than …
Chose Airship
There was a time when we went off Urban Airship and went to Spreed. We were using Spreed's app, so there was much better integration on push notifications. The push notification took readers directly into the story. When we moved from Spreed to our own native app, we went back …
Bound
Chose Bound
It has the inability to export subject line or ISP complaints that require manual pulling by each campaign when needed. Results from variable tests are also reported only as a percentage of chosen KPI (opens, clicks, etc.). There's no ability to see hard numbers from the tests …
Chose Bound
Get Smart Content is what we primarily use to serve up segmented content. The only other method or tool we've used to do so while leveraging our Demandbase variables is Optimizely. We selected Get Smart Content because they make the process of segmentation using Demandbase …
Chose Bound
Get Smart Content is quite cost effective, simple to use with great support. The support systems and simplicity based on other products used and evaluated is the best in the industry.
Features
AirshipBound
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Airship
-
Ratings
Bound
9.7
Ratings
14% above category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Airship
-
Ratings
Bound
9.8
Ratings
11% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Airship
-
Ratings
Bound
9.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Heatmap tool00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Click analytics00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scroll maps00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Goal tracking00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AirshipBound
Small Businesses
OneSignal
OneSignal
Score 8.0 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AirshipBound
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AirshipBound
Likelihood to Recommend
Well-Suited for: 1. Mobile App Notifications: Ideal for targeted push notifications in apps. 2. Customer Segmentation: Effective for personalized marketing campaigns based on user data. 3. Event-Triggered Automation: Great for automated messaging based on user actions. 4. A/B Testing: Useful for optimizing campaign messages and strategies. Less Appropriate for: 1. Non-Mobile Channels: Less effective if the primary focus is on non-mobile communications like email or direct mail. 2. Basic Email Marketing: Other platforms might be better suited for simple, broad email campaigns without complex segmentation or personalization needs.
Read full review
I think the customer service and relationship we have with Get Smart Content is great
Read full review
Pros
  • Setting up the target audience within Airship using attributes is one of my favorites.
  • Airship has a very user-friendly interface with detailed documentation for self-help. I also enjoy the training sessions, articles and reports Airship organized as those are very insightful and useful.
Read full review
  • Tracking/Data Analysis
  • Unique experiences
  • Reaching many demographics
Read full review
Cons
  • The automated A/B testing winner selection and application should be added
  • The flexibility of message shape, specifically incorporating transparency so messages do not need to be a rectangular shape
  • Faster and more reliable servers around the globe
  • Making more detailed use cases and tutorials to be followed can simplify things for users
Read full review
  • There are some additions we would like to see, such as a better experience in the Performance section. It'd be great if we could see an overall view of the metrics instead of having to drill down. We do a monthly KPI report which takes me a while to create due to the back and forth nature of comparing metrics within Get Smart Content. I also have to use Google Analytics to help with this.
  • We had some issues with the tool not updating Eloqua contacts, but that has since been resolved. The process for discovering the cause of the problem was lengthy and frustrating.
  • It would be great if you could see metrics of an A/B test within the campaign/rule, instead of having to go to the Performance section and find it. A small snapshot of info would be very helpful and it would allow us to compare and update the rule without leaving that page.
Read full review
Usability
The interface takes a bit getting used to in order to know how to take advantage of everything. Some of the analytics that are available are particularly hard to find, so it's important to pay attention when customer support reviews everything, but everything I'd want and need in terms of Push and In-App messaging is all there.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have not had to interact much with customer support as I have been able to find the vast majority of the answers I'm looking for within their documentation, which I very much appreciate because it saves me a lot of time. Customer support has been responsive and helpful for the most part during the couple of interactions I've had.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I have also worked with Vibes, Salesforce, Pendo, and Swrve for mobile app marketing efforts, and I always come back to airship as delivering the best Push and In-App messaging capabilities. If you want a full service platform for Push and In-App messaging rather than configuring these channels through something that is no cost such as Firebase, then i would recommend Airship.
Read full review
Get Smart Content is what we primarily use to serve up segmented content. The only other method or tool we've used to do so while leveraging our Demandbase variables is Optimizely. We selected Get Smart Content because they make the process of segmentation using Demandbase variables easy
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The ROI has increased more than approx. 50% (exact details to be confirmed) based on cross-channel orchestration
  • Using push notifications alone, we have seen a huge increase in app engagement which was a challenge before to nudge users to get back to the App after initial download
Read full review
  • Allows to set up automations for several different scenarios.
  • Allows tracking links and the display of the stats/reporting.
  • It has ability to duplicate campaigns, which saves me a lot of time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Airship Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Bound Screenshots

Screenshot of Campaign viewScreenshot of Segment viewScreenshot of Segment list