Alida CXM (formerly Vision Critical) is designed to enable users to listen to direct & indirect sources of customer feedback, perform automated actions on collected feedback and have complete visibility into key customer experience metrics so users can create exemplary customer experiences day after day. Alida CXM offers a holistic customer experience platform that brings in both operational and experiential data, integrates this data with the tools to collect, understand and action customer…
N/A
GetFeedback
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
GetFeedback from Momentive is a customer feedback solution designed to be easy-to-use, and measure the voice of the customer so companies can take action and provide an exceptional experience.
N/A
Pricing
Alida CXM
GetFeedback
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Alida CXM
GetFeedback
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Alida CXM
GetFeedback
Considered Both Products
Alida CXM
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Alida CXM
Qualtrics provides very similar panel manage capabilities with much better functionality.
We also have Kinesis experience. Kinesis offers a better statistical package. It is not as slick, or as easy to use. However, the technical support is outstanding. I think Vision Critical competes on its presentation capabilities, and Kinesis competes on its statistical prowess.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Alida CXM
Vision Critical is more appealing visually but no where near as complex or robust. Vision Critical is also much more expensive though.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Alida CXM
As described earlier in the review, I believe Vision Critical provides a fantastic survey tool. However, I think that some other tools are just as good for simply programming and deploying surveys. The thing that makes Vision Critical stand above the rest is the opportunity it …
Toluna has a much better layout and is more aesthetically pleasing, and creating a survey is somewhat more enjoyable and slightly easier, though the creation part for them could also use some work. VC does have them beat when it comes to analyzing and cross-tabbing results, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Alida CXM
Based on ease of use and having the most varied tools available, Vision Critical would be the best. Based on ability to higher response rates and increase engagement of respondents, Vision Critical would be the best. Based on ability to customize, Vision Critical falls short of …
Banking Officer, Client Experience Process Coordinator
Chose GetFeedback
Google forms was very basic and didn't offer the same branding options as GetFeedback. GetFeedback gave us the ability to create a survey and have it look like our company. Google forms just always looked like Google forms. It wasn't individualized enough for our liking. …
Satmetrix actually replaced GetFeedback, by SurveyMonkey at my previous company with a lot of objection from myself. The rationale was: wanted quicker survey deployment and better analytics, neither of which was solved by bringing in Satmetrix as the issues were architectural …
GetFeedback has a professional appearance and dynamic content UI that is more trustworthy than other solutions. Additionally, the transitions and branding of GetFeedback are user-friendly on any device making survey response easy to manage. Finally, Salesforce integration is …
The only other product we have used recently is SurveyMonkey. GetFeedback has better UI, is easier to use, integrates much better with Salesforce, has better logic/workflow, and is better in almost every way. But SurveyMonkey excels at crowdsourcing data and reaching audiences …
It definitely has more functions than the other tools out there. I'd recommend them over most any other survey tool besides perhaps some epic one that costs thousands. For the low-cost survey option, this seems to be the best I've seen in the market so far to this date, so yeah.
We've actually selected both. FormAssembly gives us much more flexibility from a Salesforce integration perspective...but we like the look and feel of GetFeedback better so we tend to use that when the integration isn't as important.
Senior Analyst, Renewals and Customer Success Operations
Chose GetFeedback
We used to use the survey tool that was part of Gainsight, but it didn't allow for extensive customization or branding. Other departments have used surveymonkey but there were gaps with customization and importing the data into SFDC or the data warehouse.
At the time of our evaluation we found that the integration with our CRM just wasn't there. The pricing and the ability to customize the templates made the choice to select GetFeedback easy.
If you need a robust back end statistical program, this is not for you. If you are looking for a slick, interactive media survey tool it deserves a strong look.
It is great to standardize under a single survey tool. Because it integrates so well into Salesforce it is very useful if your business lives and breathes in SFDC. It's helpful if you have a lot of surveys you are sending at different points in the customer lifecycle. You will need to have your own email delivery tool to really take advantage of when you are engaging a customer.
Some things on Vision Critical allow for customization, but other pieces seem cumbersome. Based soley on the survey piece of this software, I would rate it better than most basic online survey tools (surveyMonkey or Zoomerang), but not as customizable as some of the more advanced solutions (like Qualitrics)
The tool in Vision Critical that allows you to see survey data and reports is unwieldy and complicated to use.
Survey submissions can notify only one email address so if you need individual responses to go to another individual you have to either set-up Salesforce workflows/email alerts or auto-forward rules in the email inbox
Salesforce integration and sync is great and usually reliable but occasional record ID changes cause a failure in a survey response to sync to Salesforce. GetFeedback has no way to notify the administrator of the record's failure to sync.
Easier to sync all data to Salesforce and do survey reporting within Salesforce than within the GetFeedback user interface
I think there is a ton of room to improve, in things as simple as aesthetics and other areas of logical flow when it comes to creating and then launching a survey, as well as providing descriptors for what each field is referencing. For instance, there are like 5 date fields to be filled out, but no button near them that says "this date will determine _________" and I am not about to go back into the training module, which was confusing enough to FIND, let alone work through to find just ONE answer.
It is incredibly straightforward to use. Setup time is hours to days. When it is up and running, you can forget it exists. The Lightning Platform integration then starts to provide many options around creative use of the tools. It becomes more about where you can extend to your hearts content. Lightning App developers will have a great time here.
Absolutely fantastic support team. Willing to help you online through vast collection of how-to guides and resources, online via chatbox, or over the phone. Even though we were in different time zones, they were always available. Very helpful and knowledgeable
The few times, and I mean few, I have had to reach out to the support staff they were very helpful. I was also lucky enough to meet the developer at a users' conference. His willingness to hear what I had to say was impressive. After understanding his background coming from the CRM world I knew that he knew what we as users needed in the way of integration.
As described earlier in the review, I believe Vision Critical provides a fantastic survey tool. However, I think that some other tools are just as good for simply programming and deploying surveys. The thing that makes Vision Critical stand above the rest is the opportunity it provides for you to easily engage with the same customers on an ongoing basis and tie their responses together over time. I love that we can manage our insight community's home page, emails to panelists, surveys, reports, and much more all from the same tool.
Satmetrix actually replaced GetFeedback, by SurveyMonkey at my previous company with a lot of objection from myself. The rationale was: wanted quicker survey deployment and better analytics, neither of which was solved by bringing in Satmetrix as the issues were architectural around the self-built IP and NOT GetFeedback, which did precisely what it could with the data it had. Much like other NICE products I have encountered, the synergy with Salesforce is labored and incredibly challenging to get up and running. There was a lot of heavy lifting to get the two platforms to work with each other and the sentiment that I got from Satmetrix was that it wanted to be the centre of the CX world and would be much happier if Salesforce didn't exist. This is great if you a company that is solely marketeers but terrible if you want to leverage and use the multifaceted capabilities of CX strategies.
Our response rate for our lead qualifying survey has been hovering around 55%. That doesn't mean that they complete the entire thing, but at least we are getting some answers back. It also allows us to weed out any leads that are outside of our scope of work. The survey when answered in its entirety gets a lead 13 steps down our customer journey map.
The automation of sending out the recruiting survey has allowed our recruiting manager to focus on qualified applicants and has completely eliminated the duplicate data entry of key information that the hiring managers required for determining if a candidate should be scheduled for a phone interview. Over the past year of using this survey we received 145 survey back. That is 145 manual emails that no longer had to be sent out by staff. You do the math on that time savings.
The new hire training feedback has allowed internal trainers to understand how to better tailor each session to on-board future employees in a more effective manner. With over 33 different training modules you can imagine how intensive our on-boarding process can be and if we can understand what works and what doesn't this only adds to the effectiveness of each trainer.