AlphaSense vs. Appian vs. IBM Watson Discovery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AlphaSense
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
AlphaSense is a market intelligence platform used by companies and financial institutions. Since 2011, their AI-based technology has helped professionals make business decisions by delivering insights from public and private content—including company filings, event transcripts, news, trade journals, and equity research. The platform boasts users among 4,000 enterprise customers. Headquartered in New York City, AlphaSense employs over 1,000 people across offices in the U.S., U.K., Finland, and…N/A
Appian
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
IBM Watson Discovery
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM offers Watson Discovery, a natural language processing (NLP) application with options to measure sentiment, detect entities, semantic roles, and other concepts.N/A
Pricing
AlphaSenseAppianIBM Watson Discovery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AlphaSenseAppianIBM Watson Discovery
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AlphaSenseAppianIBM Watson Discovery
Considered Multiple Products
AlphaSense
Chose AlphaSense
S&P Capital IQ, LSEG Eikon, Evaluate, Clarivate Biopharmaceutical and Healthcare & Medtech Learning Solutions
Chose AlphaSense
AlphaSense's generative search and agentic workflows are years ahead off all other products I have tried.
Chose AlphaSense
Actually have both AlphaSense and FactSet. Each has its uniqueness but all depends on nature of the task or project at hand.
Chose AlphaSense
We use both CB Insights and AlphaSense for our work. While CB Insights is better suited for private companies, especially startups, AlphaSense is unmatched in its data for large, typically public companies and broader industry research.
Chose AlphaSense
Alphasense has a much broader coverage breadth, as it includes financial data, market data, private research, and expert interviews, while the others are more limited.
Chose AlphaSense
AlphaSense have less financial information than Evaluate
Chose AlphaSense
Compared to FactSet and PitchBook, AlphaSense is a good tool to fill my suite of financial analysis. Pitchbook is superior for private company and transaction data, as well as screening for similar companies (the sourcing feature of the job). FactSet is superior for financial …
Chose AlphaSense
I inherited AlphaSense access by joining my current role. AlphaSense's financial and deal information can not match pitchbooks. It does have better summarization for financial than pitchbook though.
Chose AlphaSense
I am not sure why you won't let me select EMIS Next, but that is a great tool with a lot of very good data that does not seem to be on your platform:
Frost & Sullivan
Mordor Intelligence
Chose AlphaSense
AlphaSense is simply the best software when it comes to finding information from publicly available documents and their access to sell-side research. While it has some room to go in terms of their access to financials, they've already made significant improvements and I'm …
Chose AlphaSense
I prefer to use both in conjunction; AlphaSense generally provides deeper insights, but I'm unsure if it is readily available or the newest (Market cap).
Chose AlphaSense
Search and analysis of public market data - analyst feedback and management commentary: I would prefer AlphaSense over other
Quant analysis of market data / charting: I would prefer S&P for Excel Plugins
PItchbook: Proprietary private market and VC data
Chose AlphaSense
Special features of AlphaSense that made us decide on this CI platform:
- US-based market and competitive intelligence platform with various premium content (broker information, expert calls, earning transcripts, original company documents etc.)
- AlphaSense is a trusted CI …
Chose AlphaSense
I liked AlphaSense more than Tegus because the UI was better.
Chose AlphaSense
I use TBR for totally different research. I use them for news about corporate direction, investment in technologies and executive leadership changes; M&A and corporate ventures; technology partnerships; and recent contract awards.
AlphaSense gives deeper insights with Expert …
Chose AlphaSense
Alphasense is way better than GlobalData; the AI search word is like magic, and the grid view is constructive.
Chose AlphaSense
Experts calls can help you to decide whether or not invest in a company. can give you insights on culture which is not easy to find in Annual reports.
Tegus is much better in summarizing experts calls as well as give you a summary of experts calls called TOP INVESTORS QUESTIONS …
Chose AlphaSense
Other platforms are not as user friendly nor have useful data outputs and sentiment analysis
Chose AlphaSense
Alphasense has available information from analysts, which is difficult to get from platforms like Factset unless you pay additional fees.
Chose AlphaSense
AlphaSense has better document search but is otherwise vastly inferior in every other way. If doc search isn't important to you, I wouldn't bother with AlphaSense.
Chose AlphaSense
All of them are better than AlphaSense. However, Bloomberg is over twice as expensive, and people are just paying a premium for Chat (which I don't want). I have not used Factset for over three years. When I last used it, I would say that it was slightly better than AlphaSense …
Chose AlphaSense
AlphaSense has the most sources and best usability of any tool I've used.
Chose AlphaSense
I did not do a competitive analysis of the product - was sold on it immediately
Appian
Chose Appian
I am a user of Appian, where we have a data connector application built in Appian that is integrated with various systems, and provide a summary in Appian UI. We as a user can initiate new requests to extract, Transform and Load data on a specific or selected system with just …
Chose Appian
There are a lot of reasons to select Appian the first is low code. We can create various interactive data connectors applications also it is best in terms of security with an interactive user interface which makes it unique from the other platforms.
Chose Appian
Appian's pricing model and co-selling is more interesting than that of Power platform. We used Appian because of its better case management and the learning curve is also not that huge. Power platform says it is Low code no code but it still requires certain some coding …
Chose Appian
Camunda is a powerful solution like Appian, however, it is somewhat difficult from the technical side, that is why I do preferer Appian instead.
Chose Appian
Appian compares favorably with other vendors in the space. It is strongest with business workflow automation and to create custom business applications. The tool base for coding is extremely straightforward and allows for faster coding and deployment. Handles very complex …
Chose Appian
We using this from long time. We're quite familiar with them. it's easy to use and understand. and it's documentation is quite helpful.
Chose Appian
much easier to navigate and design-centric.
Chose Appian
Have not used many BPM tools but we are using RPA to automate many technologies and business processes. We are also using Servicenow for incidents and change management.
Chose Appian
ease of use; inter-operability and scalability; great support and customer service
Chose Appian
Java is much more customizable but it is also a lot more work developing apps and setting up infrastructure. Appian is much easier to learn and code in. Also, apps are able to be built much quicker. This helps when time and money are an issue.
Chose Appian
We selected Appian against Kissflow for its maturity in end-to-end process automation for all kinds of industries.
Chose Appian
In the BPM space, there are a few areas that IBM BPM gives the flexibility to integrate different systems. Whereas in Cloud space [through] Appian has picked up, there are lot of features that Salesforce provide can be put in Appian
Chose Appian
It has reduced our time to market because of the feedback we got early on. The smooth movements and easy flow create a vast difference. The team gets ample time to innovate and increase performance. Tasks are well performed in sprints and ready to release with fewer errors and …
Chose Appian
I personally think Appian will win the discussion of pricing between itself and Microsoft Power Automate currently, but since I don't feel as though the average person would be able to learn how to automate processes on Appian, I have to give the nod to Microsoft Power Automate …
Chose Appian
To be honest, I have not used any other software that is similar to Appian. I am used to just using raw code when it comes to creating an application. I find Appian very useful to use in this fast-paced industry, and when the client wishes to see the iteration of the project. …
Chose Appian
I am not involved in evaluating different products. We have a specific team that is tasked with the responsibility of evaluating various products and choosing the one that is most appropriate for the organization. My team and I are the users of the products. Appian was the best …
Chose Appian
We used custom BPM solutions in the past and find greater value in using Appian. I was not a part of the architecture team that reviewed other BPM solutions when Appian was selected.
Chose Appian
Appian has a lesser learning curve than Pega. Pega uses a combination of directed and pattern inheritance and architects need to design bearing these in mind. While the intent behind this approach is to allow for reuse of rules to allow for efficient enterprise-wide design, …
Chose Appian
Appian is the only product I have used that is anything like low-code.
Chose Appian
I did not get chance to work on the other BPM tools but I am pretty sure that Appian will outstrip others in terms of Process Designing and Management, Scalability, Security, Performance and ease of use.
Chose Appian
The main product that my company uses is Microsoft Teams. I think that Appian is far superior to Microsoft Teams in many aspects but the most significant is the ability to use easily and move from reports to reports. I far prefer Appian to Teams. The design is much better and …
Chose Appian
Appian surpasses Microsoft PowerApps because of how much easier it is to code. I found Appian easier to code than the competitor because of how you could access the code behind the scene (SAIL). This allowed for even greater customization and helps with debugging when you have …
IBM Watson Discovery
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
IBM Turbonomic and IBM API Connect
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
IBM FileNet Content Manager and IBM NS1 Connect
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
IBM Watson Discovery resulted more robust and performant, also the insights were much more interesting than just an AI search from Microsoft or a prompt for ChatGPT.
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
For starters, IBM Watson Discovery was very easy to use and set up. Google Cloud AI was more advanced in learning and navigating through it, in my opinion. Ironically, the free trial was the biggest selling point. We were trying on products, and it was faster to get started …
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
This is a unique application which provides automation comfortably and with the minimum of human interaction to create the perfect application for the client involved as generally there is a chance of someone else using the similar or slightly better tool
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
IBM FileNet Content Manager
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
A edge of having a safe secure work environment where in organizations can make use of power of AI with no concern safe guard their data where IBM watson discovery provides hybrid cloud solution to mitigate the vulnerablity of data security.
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
To be entirely honest, in my review, I have used Elasticsearch in the past, but not in a way similar to that I am using Discovery, and I cannot honestly say that I can compare the two because I used Elasticsearch in infrastructure management and monitoring setup while using the …
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
Discovery differs from its competitors due to the better ease of implementation and the high level of natural language recognition, it is equal in integration resources such as API and workflow or process pipeline, but it loses in the price for a high volume of documents and/or …
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
In terms of performance, IBM Watson Discovery performs well and as expected compared to competitor offerings. Search works well Web crawl, content library creation, and 3rd party integration all possible The main driver for us is that we were already using other IBM …
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
IBM Watson Discovery for salesforce stacks up really well against the other products. It provides higher, better, and faster insight and capabilities than other options. We evaluated the return on investment and saw how great it would be to use for what we have. I think it has …
Chose IBM Watson Discovery
I have not found any other software solutions that can stack up against IBM Watson Discovery for Salesforce. This feature has proved nothing but beneficial for our bottom-line, as well as our customers'. I would recommend this solution to any company that heavily focuses on …
Features
AlphaSenseAppianIBM Watson Discovery
Financial Research
Comparison of Financial Research features of Product A and Product B
AlphaSense
7.8
Ratings
6% above category average
Appian
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Discovery
-
Ratings
Private Company Data5.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Industry-Specific Information9.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Independent Research Access9.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
M&A Analysis8.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain Data7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
ESG Data6.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit Ratings Reports6.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Macroeconomic News8.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Search Tools9.10 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
AlphaSense
-
Ratings
Appian
8.1
Ratings
4% above category average
IBM Watson Discovery
-
Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
AlphaSense
-
Ratings
Appian
7.4
Ratings
1% above category average
IBM Watson Discovery
-
Ratings
Process designer00 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AlphaSenseAppianIBM Watson Discovery
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
Yext
Yext
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
S&P Capital IQ
S&P Capital IQ
Score 7.6 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
S&P Capital IQ
S&P Capital IQ
Score 7.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AlphaSenseAppianIBM Watson Discovery
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AlphaSenseAppianIBM Watson Discovery
Likelihood to Recommend
AlphaSense is very well suited to investing teams that need a research management system that has a robust database behind and rich content management features for note-taking. AlphaSense may not be well-suited to individual investors who want data access but don't need to be sharing notes to a wider team. The sharing features are what make AlphaSense most useful.
Read full review
Appian is well suited for the areas which involve a workflow. For Example: Consider there is a task and 3 teams are required to work on the task, with Appian we can create tasks for each team and monitor the comments and completion. Together with the integration capabilities, this tool can function in many areas. In our firm, we are using it to automate the workflows for our business teams and help them in capturing the OLA's and SLA's.
Read full review
Whether using it as a standalone search tool, integrating with other IBM Watson products, or using the API to integrate with proprietary or third-party systems and applications, Watson Discovery addresses these and many other scenarios where document search is required -- understand- if here documents can be pdf, doc, txt files, websites, among other formats --, don't confuse Watson Discovery with EDRMS (Electronic document and records management system) software, Discovery goes further, allowing text search to be done within a context using natural language (NLU) and returning not only the search term but also insights and related issues. File indexing works very well, and training Discovery so that documents and technical terms are learned a bit of work, but it can be reduced by using some of the learning models already trained and available for use.
Read full review
Pros
  • Summarizing information across multiple company documents via their new Generative Grid tool.
  • Aggregating the latest insights from diverse sources - broker research, expert insights, company documents, and news.
  • Providing a repeatable way to query information.
  • Smart keywords to help you search, e.g., car = auto = automotive.
Read full review
  • Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
  • Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
  • Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Read full review
  • Help us analyse and extract useful data points and insights.
  • Powerful API which is both fast and accurate.
  • Can analyse almost every type of file including word, pdf, excel, txt etc.
  • No need to hire anyone or a freelancer to extract the data.
Read full review
Cons
  • The whole platform should be much faster with less lag.
  • The layout of the document search isn't great. Often, I find it hard to expand sources or dates.
  • Financials sections should be customisible, i.e. bolden certain ratios, remove others etc.
  • "Error loading documents, please refresh the widget" should be seen fewer times than often.
  • Why can't I export events dates to my Outlook calendar?
Read full review
  • Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
  • Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
  • Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
Read full review
  • I believe AI should be more flexible about providing data. However, it's understandable that you need to provide the details you need in a more specific and detailed way.
  • The interface could use more tweaking. Being new to the program, it was kind of hard to navigate.
  • Luckily, there was a customized feature of the dashboard that I could set up, and having something that you know where you are placed always feels familiar and comfortable.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
AlphaSense is a very useful tool and is reasonably priced for our organization. While I may not be a hyper-active user, it's a great resource when I need to quickly do a competitive landscape survey, review publicly available documents (transcripts, etc.), or review Wall Street research
Read full review
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
For my daily work AlphaSense is inevitable, as it holds a real added value compared to most of the CI platforms. It really makes my work more efficient and contributes to better strategy and decision making in the company. Datalog is
available up to 15 years, which is a real advantage compared to other CI platforms that can only start competitor monitoring following the signature of the agreement.
Read full review
There are many differences between using Appian and using other programming languages. Additionally, there are many trade offs that have to be made and that have to be accepted for using Appian. In some cases, you give up control of one small area, but in others, it may open settings that are unavailable to a developer when using other program languages.
Read full review
IBM Watson Discovery has the best user capabilities and easily transform business decision-making portfolio. The automation system saves time used in data analysis as opposed to manual research that consumes a lot of time. The visualization across the dashboard enables my team to interpret complex data and use it to make reliable marketing decisions.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
The availability of Alphasense is great. I have used the software for multiple years and cannot remember ever having an outage issue. This is surprising actually, as I use other software applications that do not have regular outages, but still have outages periodically. Alphasense, on the other hand, never seems to have any outages. Good sign if I can't remember the software not working :).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Performance
Loading or performing searches on AlphaSense platform is reasonably fast for most of the time. However, it is sometimes unacceptably long for me to load PDF files (earnings presentation, supplementary financial report) on AlphaSense. Certain features might also take very long time, such as loading for "similar tables" across EDGAR filings, or downloading tables from EDGAR filings
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Customer support is very prompt. I get personalized support for search recommendations and content that I could not find in my own search. Support checks in with me on a bi-monthly basis to keep me informed of the many different feature additions, I cannot find a more kind, understanding, and supportive team.
Read full review
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
Read full review
Similar to all IBM Watson and Salesforce product solutions, the overall support would be a 10/10. Their provided FAQ's help with frequently experienced issues and if still unable to figure something out, their customer service representatives are always super responsive. With instant chat functions available, it is easy to ask a quick question rather than sitting on hold.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The person was prepared, attentive, understood the nature of my questions, was willing to work through any difficulties or misunderstandings, was patient, and super pleasant to work with. Great customer service.
Read full review
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Trainers address the basics, and such training was meant for new users. Instructions are really helpful by providing scenarios that our team will face in our daily tasks. It will be more thoughtful if the training is conducted by case studies so as to allow new users to get first-hand experience during the training.
Read full review
Very boring; hard to get through quickly, but rather effective in demonstrating the use of the platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
seamless integration
Read full review
It was really seamless. SaaS in the true definition of the word. We logged on and started using the product. Very easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Compared to FactSet and PitchBook, AlphaSense is a good tool to fill my suite of financial analysis. PitchBook is superior for private company and transaction data, as well as screening for similar companies (the sourcing feature of the job). FactSet is superior for financial analysis for public companies, as well as charting data. AlphaSense is superior in research for documents and deep dive industry research (mostly qualitative) and grabbing data from financial documents
Read full review
Appian compares favorably with other vendors in the space. It is strongest with business workflow automation and to create custom business applications. The tool base for coding is extremely straightforward and allows for faster coding and deployment. Handles very complex process flows and has the ability to discover new opportunities for automation.
Read full review
To be entirely honest, in my review, I have used Elasticsearch in the past, but not in a way similar to that I am using Discovery, and I cannot honestly say that I can compare the two because I used Elasticsearch in infrastructure management and monitoring setup while using the ELK stack (Elasticsearch - Logstash and Kibana).
Read full review
Scalability
The sharing features provides by AlphaSense mean that it can be readily scaled for teams within an organization and, subject to compliance requirements, with client organizations. The ability to share annotations of transcripts and investor releases is valuable, and facilitates collaboration between analysts.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Research speed has now increased to a single day, allowing us to find everything we want about an industry, compared to 3-5 days before with Alphasense.
  • Comps analysis, gathering detailed financial information, is now seamless and can be completed in less than 1 hour, compared to 1-2 days.
  • Expert interview access, before Alphasense, we had no way of including this into our analysis. This has significantly improved the quality of our decisions and research.
Read full review
  • Our IT automated procurement process has sped up time to get paid by a few days on every transaction
  • Our approvals are more organized as a result of being put in digitally
  • Managing our own tenant requires more than we have available, given the quarterly updates
  • Since we have business-critical functions running in the platform, we have to thoroughly review every note of every update. Because of this we skip half of the updates since we don't have enough time to review these changes four times a year.
Read full review
  • IBM Watson Discovery has had only positive impacts on our overall business objective of providing quality customer service and timely resolutions for our clients.
  • The use of this integration has made life easier for our customer service team, who can now resolve cases for customers quicker and easier.
  • Our company prides itself on the service and expertise we're able to provide for our customers and IBM Watson Discovery has only made that task easier for our employees to perform.
Read full review
ScreenShots

AlphaSense Screenshots

Screenshot of AlphaSense's AI search, available across 2,000+ premium business data sources including SEC filings, earnings calls, broker research, business journals, and news. It can be used to stay ahead of market-moving trends and instantly surface critical information buried within millions of documents.Screenshot of a single view of the industries, companies and themes within a fully-customizable dashboard, that can be tailored to fit any research process.Screenshot of a purpose-built generative AI that offers insights from a premium content universe.

Appian Screenshots

Screenshot of Low-Code DevelopmentScreenshot of Business Process Management SuiteScreenshot of Dynamic Case ManagementScreenshot of Mobile App DevelopmentScreenshot of Appian RPA with Blue Prism