Anaplan vs. QuotaPath

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anaplan
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Anaplan is a scenario planning and analysis platform designed to optimize decision-making in complex business environments so that enterprises can outpace their competition and the market. By building connections and collaboration across organizational silos, the Anaplan platform surfaces key insights.N/A
QuotaPath
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
QuotaPath automates the commission process, helping revenue teams manage and track variable pay. Teams that use QuotaPath gain real-time visibility into commissions and forecasted earnings.
$25
per month (billed annually) per user
Pricing
AnaplanQuotaPath
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$25
per month (billed annually) per user
Growth
$35
per month (billed annually) per user
Premium
$50
per month (billed annually) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnaplanQuotaPath
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsQuotaPath has three pricing editions, each with a platform fee that includes the all-in cost of QuotaPath for teams with up to five users. (This includes user access, ongoing support, integration implementations, and is billed annually. Any users beyond the first five have a per-seat cost relative to their associated tier.) The Growth tier offers a free trial.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnaplanQuotaPath
Considered Both Products
Anaplan
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan was cheaper or similar cost to the competition.
Anaplan was able to fit more use cases.
Anaplan was a flexible modeling tool that had greater future project potential compared to other tools.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is an evolution of classic EPM tools like SAP BPC. It is simply a much easier system to maintain and roll-out. Dashboards are very user friendly and the Excel add-in is just as powerful. Anaplan excels at connected planning where all models are connected and rolled up …
Chose Anaplan
I believe Anaplan is a more complete tool with a wider range of use-cases and more true connected planning.
Chose Anaplan
Very comparable products and recommendation depends on technology footprint within organization
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is not a point solution. Instead of having multiple systems that each do one business process (and can only do that business process in one way), Anaplan can do many different business processes for multiple business units. Sales, Finance, HR and other parts of the …
Chose Anaplan
Jedox has limited the standard dimensions to 6 only in the financial workspace. If you need any other custom dimension, it has to be defined in analytical workspace. However, data interchange between Financial Workspace and Analytical workspaces are not real-time and rely on …
Chose Anaplan
Essbase/HFM were hosted on-prem and required regular maintenance from the vendor. The tools were good at the simple tasks of consolidation and relatively simple allocation/calculations. Anaplan is a cloud-hosted platform that can be accessed almost anywhere with an internet …
Chose Anaplan
Creating financial forecasts in Anaplan was a big improvement over doing the same activity in Microsoft Excel. The main difference is that Anaplan makes it easier to build models based on large amounts of data and to forecast concurrently with many users across your …
Chose Anaplan
I think Anaplan is a better and more mature product than SAP SAC, but SAC has a better integration with its core modules and BW platforms.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan offers faster performance. The modelling tool is user oriented.
Chose Anaplan
We like Anaplan for its flexibility, out-of-the-box starting apps, speed to deploy, and ability to maintain long-term.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan feels like the golden standard. Pigment lacks necessary functionality like actions.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion - Anaplan is far better calculation engine and way more modern. However, Anaplan still struggles to provide reporting, especially adhoc reporting in excel based off a data model.

Anaplan vs Pigment - Anaplan is a more proven product, however, Pigment …
Chose Anaplan
Definitely a leader in the space. Far ahead in terms of capabilities. On the high end in terms of end user experience.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is easier to implement, easier to use, easier to maintain than these tools. It scales easily with the business. Workflows are easy to implement. It is easy to drill down and understand how the tool obtained a specific result, giving confidence in its calculations. …
Chose Anaplan
Easy of use is Anaplan's main advantage. As Anaplan is code-less configuration, and the logic for model building is by far the simplest, it would make the learning curve less steep. This is very important when we are showing our clients that, their complicated planning scenario …
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is one of the only tools flexible to handle bespoke commission calculations. In addition to Sales Performance Management, Anaplan can be used to support other business functions, such as workforce planning or financial planning & analysis. Anaplan provides the …
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is a proven tool for scalable applications and is flexible to support multiple use cases. Its support is established and the user community is strong. Resources to support the product are readily available.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is more powerful than Pigment considering that it is an Enterprise class system and is able to manage bigger data sets. Anaplan allows for advanced scenario modeling and formula capabilities along with custom reporting functionalities. Anaplan has proven its …
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan and these other tools are very similar. I cannot say that I selected Anaplan over them as I have worked with and been involved with setting up a number of tools for clients. They all have their advantages and Anaplan is a very strong tool in the cloud planning space.
Chose Anaplan
can be implemented across multiple use cases- also Anaplan is an enterprise solution. Had good reviews in market and also used by other competitors in industry
QuotaPath
Chose QuotaPath
QuotaPath is fairly easy to use and integrate and use, but the only problem is the fact that it is very difficult to manage a very large data case with different incentive structure on QuotaPath, hence it is good for small organisations. Also QuotaPath is really affordable if …
Chose QuotaPath
Salesforce is better for more extensive and sales-focused companies with more nuances, but it also comes with a hefty price tag. QuotaPath is excellent for smaller teams kicking things off. I would recommend it as a beginner solution or an excellent lightweight solution for …
Chose QuotaPath
QuotaPath was the had the best ease of use for my end users, and the right price point
Chose QuotaPath
We also evaluated Concert but I'm not seeing that as an option. We selected QuotaPath over all others because of the stunning UI/UX, the self serve option at the beginning, and the streamlined onboarding process.
Chose QuotaPath
CaptivateIQ operates in more of a spreadsheet fashion. I appreciated its extreme customizability but it isn't for everyone.
Chose QuotaPath
Xactly Incent was very difficult to configure. And UI wasn't very friendly. Spiff and CaptivateIQ had a good UI but the learning and coding required was going to be too much for the short window of time before implementation was due. QuotaPath was able to build our comp plans …
Chose QuotaPath
QuotaPath is incredibly user friendly, and integrates with CRM so easily. Eliminates much of the back and forth that exists with other competitors.
Chose QuotaPath
I have looked at the integrated tools for CRMs such as Copper which tries to handle a leaderboard. This tool is not useful at all and does not motivate sales teams to perform. It does not consider sales quota and individual compensation in a relevant way. CRMs are primarily …
Chose QuotaPath
QuotaPath is much more user friendly and admin friendly. Not as difficult to set up and much more flexible.
Chose QuotaPath
My favorite thing and main reason we went with QuotaPath was their teams willingness to work with us. They have a comp consultant who helped us develop new plans, as well as a strong onboarding and support staff willing to field and help on any questions or concerns that I had
Chose QuotaPath
Way too cumbersome to setup, high implementation costs, not built for our size business
Chose QuotaPath
I haven't used CaptivateIQ but got a demo of it and its pricing. QuotaPath is much more affordable and allows me to be more hands-on with it. CaptivateIQ has a platform fee and the cost per seat is much higher. It does allow for more customization over QuotaPath but our plans …
Chose QuotaPath
Simplicity and streamlined implementation
Chose QuotaPath
QP was the most affordable and transparent with their pricing.
Features
AnaplanQuotaPath
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
9.1
Ratings
16% above category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Publish to Web8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.2
Ratings
10% above category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
9.1
Ratings
8% above category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
6.9
Ratings
8% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.9
Ratings
9% above category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.9
Ratings
10% above category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Flat file integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales ICM
Comparison of Sales ICM features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
-
Ratings
QuotaPath
9.6
Ratings
20% above category average
Sales compensation plan creation00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Complex sales crediting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Sales compensation process automation00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Incentive auditing/regulation compliance00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Sales compensation dashboards & forecasting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Incentive modeling00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Agile incentive strategy00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
ICM mobile visibility00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AnaplanQuotaPath
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AnaplanQuotaPath
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.2
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnaplanQuotaPath
Likelihood to Recommend
With its versions and native time features Anaplan is well suited for all activities around planning in time and scenarios. Tasks involving calculating across multiple dimensions make Anaplan shine - the easiness to build complex calculation and present results on customizable pages. With its access restrictions it's well suited also for working with sensitive data (employee and customers personal data).
Read full review
It's really an all-in-one solution for tracking the success of a sales team. You can establish unique earning paths per sales rep (user) to allow for flexible commission structures, bonus payouts for going above and beyond, and more. I think it's a great solution for anyone looking to get more insight into their sales team's productivity - and to expand an existing sales force.
Read full review
Pros
  • Anaplan removes the time consuming process of integrating the results of individual spreadsheets.
  • Anaplan facilitates the standardization of assumptions across all sub-processes
  • Anaplan provides full transparency of the calculations and source inputs
  • Anaplan allows us to automate certain planning processes that would have been impossible when relying on the computational capabilities of an individual computer.
Read full review
  • We don’t have to calculate commissions in Excel anymore! It takes a fraction of the time it used to calculate commissions. Saves about 1-2 days on month end close. I like that it is easy for me and reps to drill down and see the calculations of their payouts. Reps can see calcs all month long instead of having to wait until the end of the month, so acts as a motivator. Sales managers can manage their direct reports better.
  • When I first started using QP, I was not thrilled with the quota attainment reporting for dollars, percent, and team management. I’m glad that they added leaderboards and are working on better reporting. I like the UX and UI of the whole software.
  • I like being able to export the following easily to Excel – resolved payouts for all payouts, payouts by rep, and Ledger (ASC 606) info.
  • Admins can request that reps acknowledge their plans through QP, which helps with compliance and ensures we are in agreement with calculations. I like that they are adding a docusign feature.
  • You can easily adjust earnings if a correction is needed, even after the month is closed. Just make sure you reverse from the end of the process (i.e. undo in ledger, undo the resolved payout, delete the unresolved payout, un-approve the deal).
Read full review
Cons
  • Ability to decide if to apply the formula or a manual input on front end for each line item
  • Real Time Data Transfer across models. Currently Data is transferred using Processes across different models. Having a functionality to access data from any model in real time would be great
Read full review
  • More workspace roles with the ability to customize what each user is able to do. Currently, there's only member and team manager. The team manager currently has too much power and we want to remove some of the things they're able to do like approve deals.
  • When you sync a deal from the CRM, you can override the earnings but you cannot override the field value you're syncing over. It would be great if that was possible.
  • When you want to exclude a deal, you have to go in the filters and add a rule to exclude the ID. It would be better if there's an option to reject deals in certain paths as an approver.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Anaplan is already an established market leader in enterprise planning area. Its flexibility to build multi-dimensional models, real time scenario plannings are proven to be the best features and successfully implemented by global organizations. Anaplan's ambitious product team is ensuring to roll out new features regularly based on customer/ partner feedback. e.g their new improved polaris environment has strong potential to build very large models without worrying about sparsity. The integration with other tools/technologies is being easier (e.g. cloudworks). Hence, considering Anaplan as a platform that has proved to be successful tool in enterprise level planning, its focus on regular feature enhancements and future release roadmaps I believe this platform has potential to evolve further along with our business processes and requirements
Read full review
I don't have buying decision but we have input on the software or solutions we use and this has been a game changer to review our commissions. Quota Path makes it very easy to ensure we are on target. Saves us a lot of time compared to using spreadsheets
Read full review
Usability
As a user it is a very simple tool, but at the same time with a very mature and powerful calculation engine. It is very easy to switch from excel or traditional tools with added capabilities of multi dimensionality and real time calculation engine to see quick insights needed to create plans and scenarios
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
There are very few outages. Maintenance is scheduled on two or three Saturdays per month, so as not to affect businesses. When there is an outage, users are kept informed of progress to restore the platform and typically this takes no more than an hour. Anaplan customer support is very responsive if we ever have questions about platform issues
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Unless a model is poorly constructed, the platform can accommodate tens or even hundreds of users without any impact on model performance. Dashboard pages load quickly, reports can be exported to Excel or pdf quickly, and integrations with other systems can be scheduled for quiet times of the day. Adding new use cases to the platform should also have minimal impact on performance if done in a careful way and following best practice principles
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support quality has dropped since Thoma Bravo has taken over. I think some serious re-focus needs to happen here -- part of the beauty of being in the Anaplan community was how involved you felt in it before. Before I didn't dread sending a support ticket, now I am starting to.
Read full review
We got a dedicated CSM to help with bugs, troubleshooting, and redesign of comp plans. When we ran into issues with the calculations, the CSM was able to assist identifying the root case so that we could fix it. CSM was also very receptive of product roadmap ideas and willing to engage quarterly or more often.
Read full review
In-Person Training
In my opinion, in-person training is always the best if you have the option to do so. This allows real-time interactions with the instructions, whereas the online training I took required me to write-down questions, email them, and wait for responses. This slows down the process, as you can imagine. That said, in-person training is an extra cost and it likely isn't needed for everyone. I would suggest selecting a small number of people to take in-person training and then having them act as mentors to the rest of your team. That way, as the rest of the team takes the online training, they have a resource to help them in real time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Learning made easy . One of the best trainings i have attended. Training was very detailed training by the trainer, which helped me understand the basics of the model building. Level 1 training was easy and instructor was most helpful here. Level 2 training was challenging but was able to go thru due to understanding of the basics.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Agile methodology and breaking the work down into sprints was very helpful. Implementation required a deeper dive into our data than expected for the consultants to be able to construct the data model. But once it was in place, the focus on knowledge transfer enabled us to be able to use the product effectively after the team rolled off.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Anaplan is not a point solution. Instead of having multiple systems that each do one business process (and can only do that business process in one way), Anaplan can do many different business processes for multiple business units. Sales, Finance, HR and other parts of the business can go to one place to get their work done.
Read full review
Salesforce is better for more extensive and sales-focused companies with more nuances, but it also comes with a hefty price tag. QuotaPath is excellent for smaller teams kicking things off. I would recommend it as a beginner solution or an excellent lightweight solution for sales transparency and payouts to your team.
Read full review
Scalability
We have managed to leverage Anaplan for financial planning and forecasting across the business. It is now used by almost every department, with more than 50 users (but I know of companies that have hundreds of users) and still the platform is quick and reliable. It is easy to make changes to divisions and departments or add users and apply different user settings - the core part of the model is not affected and end users can continue their work without any disruption
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • You will see greater accuracy within your forecasts by leveraging Anaplan to look at historical values while including projections such as seasonality.
  • You will save time, resulting in team members spending more time on value-add opportunities.
  • You will have happy end users that have access to self-service reports, removing any bottlenecks through the workflow.
Read full review
  • I can't quantify the time/money saved but we reduced the amount of time finance spent manually updating spreadsheets for comp statements.
  • We reduced the amount of disputes and issues people had with their earnings and payouts
  • We had 0 errors with deals being missed and not paid out to reps.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Anaplan Screenshots

Screenshot of a preview of the Anaplan login page.Screenshot of a preview of an Anaplan home page.Screenshot of a preview of an Anaplan board.

QuotaPath Screenshots

Screenshot of the scalable team workflows that automate commission management, with task prioritization and success insights.Screenshot of the home experience for reps to create ownership for their compensation, where they can see updates from the last time they logged in (including deals with commissions earned), understand how they are performing, and forecast earnings based on their pipeline.Screenshot of quota attainment tracking and forecasting, to understand how individual reps and teams are pacing toward goals, with leaderboards to motivate teams with friendly competition.Screenshot of payout schedules for earned amounts, with the option to split commissions into multiple payouts with installments, and explanations of clawbacks to catch overpayments. Reps can cross-reference their earnings and know exactly what will be on their paycheck.Screenshot of the AI-Powered Plan Builder, which enables quick setups and adjustments to build and execute your comp plans in QuotaPath. Describe your plan in a few words, or upload a PDF of your plan, and allow AI to configure it for QuotaPath.Screenshot of the self-serve integrations to connect data, with CRM connections like HubSpot and Salesforce and invoicing systems like Quickbooks and Stripe.