VP in Corporate at Coastal Medical and Psychiatric Services (Medical Practice, 11-50 employees)
Chose athenaClinicals
I was not the one that selected the program but we all voted as a group and the CEO made the decision. We actually voted to do more research because of the expense of the program.
It is easy to use and to learn with many available templates. We are in psychiatry and there were …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose athenaClinicals
Again, I would recommend Athena second on this list...and it's all practice specific. If a practice can afford Athena, then it's an ok system...but do not expect an intuitive system such as Cerner that can be fully customized and follows a physician workflow better.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
CEO in Corporate at Coastal Medical and Psychiatric Services (Medical Practice, 11-50 employees)
Chose Practice Fusion
Practice fusion is much more user friendly than the other programs that we have used. The more costly EMR's were definitely no better and the ones we have used were not nearly as easy to use. I would highly recommend practice fusion over Athena or Allscripts.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
athenaClinicals
Practice Fusion
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of athenaClinicals and Practice Fusion
Feature
athenaClinicals
8.4
8 Ratings
11% above category average
Practice Fusion
8.2
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Real-time eligibility verification
9.38 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Claims management
8.38 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Coding
9.07 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Patient billing
8.38 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Financial Reporting
7.08 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of athenaClinicals and Practice Fusion
Feature
athenaClinicals
8.2
8 Ratings
7% above category average
Practice Fusion
5.2
7 Ratings
39% below category average
Rule-based scheduling
7.76 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders
8.38 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Automated patient check-in
8.37 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Multi-location support
8.38 Ratings
7.23 Ratings
Calendar interface
8.36 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of athenaClinicals and Practice Fusion
Feature
athenaClinicals
8.9
9 Ratings
21% above category average
Practice Fusion
6.4
7 Ratings
12% below category average
Charting / document management
8.99 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Templates
8.99 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Patient portal
10.08 Ratings
7.14 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support
8.47 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Fax integration
9.99 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
7.69 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Workflow automation
8.89 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Speech recognition
9.04 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customization
7.29 Ratings
1.06 Ratings
E-prescribing
9.99 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of athenaClinicals and Practice Fusion
Feature
athenaClinicals
8.4
9 Ratings
1% above category average
Practice Fusion
7.2
7 Ratings
14% below category average
HIPAA compliance
8.39 Ratings
5.07 Ratings
Role-based permission levels
9.99 Ratings
4.06 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy
8.39 Ratings
9.84 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe
7.08 Ratings
9.93 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of athenaClinicals and Practice Fusion
Works well for family med and peds primary care. Would not be well suited to wound healing/hyperbaric medicine practice in current configuration as the specific documentation requirements of wound management and hyperbaric treatments don't mesh well with the layout and forms that I observed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The best scenario is a small non-profit clinic who needs a great EMR but cannot afford one like EPIC. I might also recommend this to colleagues who are starting a small business because I think PF would be a good, easy, and more affordable to get up and running. I think this EMR makes less sense in the setting of large academic institutions who need lots of easily manipulable data and a huge amount of support.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Quality programs - able to see what measures are outstanding for the patient
Reporting - able to report on multiple financial reports as well as clinical information
Standardization of clinical information - the system forces users within the same specialty to use the same templates (as a starting point), therefore it is easier to standardize protocols and treatments of care
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Document storage- You can upload documents and attach them to specific patients. As well as flag documents that need to be signed, and assign them to specific doctors.
Charting- Very detailed integration for charting.
Reporting- We really enjoy the reports we can pull from within the software.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The schedule needs to be improved. You should be able to see the schedule in a day, a week , in a month view and be able to schedule directly from the schedule.
It's difficult to name items because they are traditionally corrected very quickly
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We always get a return call within the time stated. There are many available topics on the forum and it is often easy to find the issue you are seeking more information on. When we have tried the live chat feature we have been satisfied with the timeliness and response.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a surgery center application, it is much better to use a system that is uniquely designed for surgery centers. Using Athena as a less than desirable work around has been a frustrating experience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
NextGen is hard to use as far as medical records. Practice Fusion is user friendly. There is a great knowledge base for questions asked. Practice Fusion takes all the guess work out of the day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info