Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aurea Process
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Aurea Process (formerly CX Process) from Aurea Software in Austin is a business process management offering, based on Savvion BPM.
$200,000
per year
OnBase
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
OnBase by Hyland is an enterprise content management platform with business process and case management capabilities. It is modular by design and allows users to tailor the solution to their specific requirements.N/A
OpenText Documentum
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
Pricing
Aurea ProcessOnBaseOpenText Documentum
Editions & Modules
License
$200,000
per year
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aurea ProcessOnBaseOpenText Documentum
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aurea ProcessOnBaseOpenText Documentum
Considered Multiple Products
Aurea Process

No answer on this topic

OnBase
Chose OnBase
I have worked with SharePoint in the past. Workview is comparable, but having the Workflow engine blows it out of the water! We have actually migrated serval SharePoint applications to OnBase because SharePoint lacked the functionality. We have a subsidiary that completely …
Chose OnBase
A core solution like Jack Henry works really well with other Jack Henry products or solutions but is not as versatile as a solution like OnBase in that it can support much different software or document solution needs.
Chose OnBase
IntelliChief (Quadrant product) was used as the first AP invoice workflow and content repository in 2006. Very hard to compare since I haven't used a current version.
RVI - Real Vision Inc. was used for Credit/Collections documents and workflow. No way to compare
Haven't had …
Chose OnBase
OnBase provided a very robust workflow process compared to others.
Chose OnBase
The version of SharePoint we were utilizing was not very practical. We oftentimes had issues with archived documents, where they could be found or opening them all together. It seemed the older the document the harder it was to access when logged into SharePoint. This is …
Chose OnBase
From what I understand after I stopped using ImageNow Hyland bought the property so I do not know that there is a difference at this point. I have not used Microsoft's Azure Data Storage but they may be poised to have a viable competitor due to the powerful tools they can …
Chose OnBase
A strength with OnBase over many other applications is the ease of the point and click configuration.
Chose OnBase
What helped in making the decision to switch to OnBase were three elements that were very important in reaching our company goals. Hyland's consistent track record of being committed to customer success, OnBase's lower total cost of ownership compared to the product used …
Chose OnBase
Perceptive Content (Used)
We switched off of Perceptive Content because their support was absolutely horrendous and the company just completely stopped innovating. Their platform didn't provide the ability to integrate like OnBase does today. There are no limits to what we can …
Chose OnBase
I did not participate in the search for this solution, so I do not know how Onbase by Hyland compares to the other products that are available. I am not familiar with other such products that can do what OnBase by Hyland is doing for us. Knowing our IT department who made the …
Chose OnBase
The city had made the decision to go with OnBase by Hyland before I got here. It seems to work well for city needs and processes.
Chose OnBase
I would say I like this system better for the housing of secure type documents as it is super safe and has security measures attached on saving and printing, and some documents are super confidential and this software allows that use better than other software I've used. I …
Chose OnBase
OnBase combines all of its features into one user-friendly platform.
Chose OnBase
I suppose that Google Drive is the closest comparable software that I have personally used. I can't say that I know enough about Google Drive from a professional use perspective to be able to compare though.
Chose OnBase
It's much easier to administrate and is very user-friendly compared to my experience with Kofax.
Chose OnBase
OnBase is a very extensible platform that can do anything as long as you're willing to pay for the add-on for it. Many of the other competitors out there do content management well but don't easily integrate, or integrate at all, with third party systems. I highly recommend …
Chose OnBase
We went with OnBase because other organizations we work with use it, so we wanted to use something similar. Also, other solutions are way more expensive.
Chose OnBase
Oracle and Seismic are two competitors that I know of. OnBase is less expensive than either. However, it is less polished than Seismic. Overall, they serve slightly different functions. OnBase is better used for overall document storage and centralization, while both Oracle and …
Chose OnBase
We selected OnBase because Hyland had purchased the company who we were using previously. We migrated all of our documents and processing workloads to OnBase about 4 years ago and have been using the product since then. We're impressed by the capabilities of the program but are …
Chose OnBase
I have never used any other products, so I can't make that decision.
OpenText Documentum
Chose OpenText Documentum
Sharepoint and others are a bit late to the party -- they have some nice features, but are leaders in the suite spot areas that we found OpenText helping us with.
Chose OpenText Documentum
At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
Chose OpenText Documentum
Features and underlying technology and development roadmap are much better for both Docushare and Confluence. OpenText product was preselected when I came into the implementation of the project. It should not have been.
Chose OpenText Documentum
Subjective but here's how I see it:
Heavy duty (in order of how much they can do and how much they can handle): 1)Documentum, 2)FileNet 3)OpenText
Middle duty: 1)WCC-WebCenter Content, 2)Alfresco, 3)M-Files (3rd b/c it is Windows only), 4)Nuxeo (only b/c of its newish approach …
Chose OpenText Documentum
We have evaluated IBM Filenet, Alfresco and Oracle WCM. Documentum has a very strong business process management system, security and scalability. It's not just a web content management system, it's an enterprise content management system with very good capabilities for …
Chose OpenText Documentum
We selected EMC Documentum because of its robustness and scalability.
Chose OpenText Documentum
While Livelink has many more modules out of the box and provide some more functionality which can be applied to document lifecycle without writing any customizations, from the support perspective Documentum is much cheaper to support and it is much more stable than Opentext ECM …
Chose OpenText Documentum
There are numerous other products available including SharePoint, Stellent, FileNet, etc. Most offer many of the same solutions and modules that Documentum provides, however some, such as SharePoint, still have significant shortcomings when it comes to true, enterprise-level …
Chose OpenText Documentum
Robustness of Documentum is far better than SharePoint.
Features
Aurea ProcessOnBaseOpenText Documentum
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
5.3
Ratings
37% below category average
OnBase
-
Ratings
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Dashboards6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports4.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
5.8
Ratings
36% below category average
OnBase
-
Ratings
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Process designer6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine5.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support5.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution5.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
4.0
Ratings
70% below category average
OnBase
-
Ratings
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools4.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
4.0
Ratings
68% below category average
OnBase
-
Ratings
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Content management4.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
OnBase
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
OpenText Documentum
9.2
Ratings
13% above category average
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings8.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings8.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings5.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings7.60 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Aurea ProcessOnBaseOpenText Documentum
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aurea ProcessOnBaseOpenText Documentum
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.8
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aurea ProcessOnBaseOpenText Documentum
Likelihood to Recommend
The tool has potential. Its capabilities and visual aspects could be considered rather basic but this might improve, particularly if the business intelligence/analytics aspect is leveraged. Once running well, it could allow (perhaps smaller) companies to successfully improve their customers' experiences through digitalizing customer journey - and we all know that customer loyalty goes a long way. However, whether or not the tool is comprehensive enough to deliver this for larger companies with more complex, multi- and omni-channel interactions is yet to be seen...
Read full review
OnBase is a content services solution for organizations that need high visibility to documents or information across multiple teams or departments. It supports users' access control, workflow functionality with transaction history, electronic document retention, and destruction documentation. Hyland can support the organization for implementations or solutions, or the organization can utilize the education services and build out the solution themselves.
Read full review
What are the document volume, the throughput - currently and expected in year, 3 years etc.? Is the company doing content management on international level, where access from multiple locations is needed - then Documentum can be good investment. What ECM system will be used for - document storage, document lifecycle or retention? Or all of the above? - Documentum works very well if all 3 items are combined, yet for storage there must be cheaper and more easily adaptable solutions available.
Read full review
Pros
  • Face-lifted platforms: CX Messenger (formerly Sonic), CX Monitor (formerly Actional), CX Process (formerly Savvion)
  • User-friendly UI
  • Relatively painless implementation
Read full review
  • Houses documents for easy retrival.
  • Allows for simple document scanning and storage.
  • Has the ability to allow paperless document import so document do not have to scanned.
  • Makes the review and document sharing process easy.
  • Has security features that allow you to keep only the staff you want to view documents able to access them.
Read full review
  • It's good at integration with external systems through standard industry supported APIs, including but not limited to web services integration and file system integration.
  • Good support from major up and downstream technologies such as image capturing and back end ERP, Database, and HR.
  • Highly configurable.
  • Very fast searching capabilities.
  • Highly scalable.
Read full review
Cons
  • Standard edition is significantly lighter touch than the (pricier) Enterprise version
  • There are similar solutions on the market that are competitively prices and offer positive user experience
  • Data migration can be tricky at times
Read full review
  • The Administrator interface, while powerful, is antiquated and has so many options to chose from it can be overwhelming at times trying to find what you need in order to accomplish a task.
  • The Unity application is a work in progress and is missing out of some features that are much better in the thick client, such as scanning documents in at high volume. This has improved over time, though.
  • Hyland Onbase is a content management platform and, while it does handle ingestion and scanning processes, does require a 3rd party application to really complete the whole package. Hyland's Perceptive platform or Kofax Capture complement it greatly.
Read full review
  • Expense. If Documentum costs less it would penetrate more markets. This is often the reason a lighter weight solution is chosen.
  • Web Publishing. Documentum is not a great solution for replacing CMSs like SiteCore or Drupal. Probably better as an archiving target for parallel publishing to both web and Documentum. Documentum is also not a web hosting solution like some other systems, it is possible to try and consume directly from the repository in real time but it is better to push web content out and consume from another platform.
  • Development. The price of broad functionality is complexity. Arguably, Documentum drank the kool-aid and tried to become like other enterprise solutions by adapting Java, Windows, etc. in the late '90s and it made them slower, more complex in design, and less stable. They recovered from that but it still requires developers with a few years of experience in Documentum to safely develop in Documentum. The issue is not knowing Java but knowing what to do or not do in an ECM system. This is even more important in regulated ECM/RM systems.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
OnBase has become a core part of our enterprise solutions toolkit due to its ever-growing integration capabilities. Any business process that produces or tracks documents or object entities can be modeled and managed within OnBase and used to supplement almost any line-of-business system that we use.
Read full review
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
You get out of something what you put into it. You reap what you sow! If an organization will spend time setting the solution up, dedicating staff to its development and ongoing support, and always keep the end-user in mind during development, you will have one of the most well-received solutions in your organization. So many organizations that I speak with stand up a solution but don't commit someone to its upkeep and development. It is vital that you have the staff to work within the solution on a daily basis.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have had exceptional support from Hyland; however, I am a direct customer from Hyland and receive support directly from Hyland support technicians. I have heard complaints from other customers who have partner relationships as then the support is 100% driven through the partner and you are dependent on the skills and abilities of your partner corporate support team.
Read full review
Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The trainer was very knowledgeable and was a Hyland employee. The training was at their corporate headquarters, so it allowed our team to become familiar with organization and culture.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
No answers on this topic
With the Premium subscription, there is a tone of training with audio and practice options.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Using Hyland professional services to assist with the implementation made things much easier. They have the knowledge and experience to get the system live as users are expecting
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
IntelliChief (Quadrant product) was used as the first AP invoice workflow and content repository in 2006. Very hard to compare since I haven't used a current version. RVI - Real Vision Inc. was used for Credit/Collections documents and workflow. No way to compare Haven't had to look for a replacement for any reason since purchasing OnBase.
Read full review
Subjective but here's how I see it: Heavy duty (in order of how much they can do and how much they can handle): 1)Documentum, 2)FileNet 3)OpenText Middle duty: 1)WCC-WebCenter Content, 2)Alfresco, 3)M-Files (3rd b/c it is Windows only), 4)Nuxeo (only b/c of its newish approach that may lead somewhere) Light duty: 1) BOX (not an ECM but it says it is), 2) EFSS (pick your poison, BOX is an enhanced EFSS), 3) CMSs (some have some ECM capability, none have much)
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • As our customers vary in size and maturity, the ROI ranges accordingly.
  • For younger, smaller businesses this is a useful tool. Digitalization of he customer journey has certainly helped save time and efforts in many cases.
  • For more mature market players the tool is not always comprehensive enough. Dashboard and report personalization take time and efforts, and sometimes it feels that a dedicated BI tool would be a more suitable solution.
Read full review
  • OnBase provides a very reliable ECM platform for the company.
  • OnBase helped to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders. This saved real estate cost as well as facilitated the ability to work from anywhere.
  • OnBase made same day processing of all incoming and outgoing documents a reality.
Read full review
  • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
  • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
  • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Aurea Process Screenshots

Screenshot of CX Platform enables leading companies to modernize, automate, and monitor their back office by bridging legacy SOA solutions to modern micro-service and container-based architectures.

OnBase Screenshots

Screenshot of an Approval for an Ad-Hoc Task.Screenshot of Onbase's Dark Mode.Screenshot of the Document Viewer.Screenshot of the Send to Department feature.Screenshot of the Workflow Stage.