Auris, formerly Heartland Payroll, is a solution designed to serve as a single point of contact, where customers have online access to their payroll data and employee information.
N/A
CEIPAL WorkForce
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
Ceipal enables users to integrate and manage the talent acquisition lifecycle, to simplify, scale, and transform any high-growth business into a diverse talent powerhouse. Ceipal serves over 2,500+ customers and 120,000 recruiters globally.
N/A
Brassring
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.
N/A
Pricing
Auris
CEIPAL WorkForce
Brassring
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Auris
CEIPAL WorkForce
Brassring
Free Trial
No
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
5% discount for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Auris
CEIPAL WorkForce
Brassring
Features
Auris
CEIPAL WorkForce
Brassring
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Auris
5.6
9 Ratings
38% below category average
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.9
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
1.05 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
1.03 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
9.72 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
1.17 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
9.35 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
7.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.7
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
8.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.4
1 Ratings
10% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
8.0
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.7
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Report builder
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
9.0
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
New hire portal
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
9.0
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.8
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Auris
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
8.3
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
We changed payroll companies from Paycom to Heartland this year at the recommendation of our insurance agent who insisted they would integrate with the EASE system, which tracks employee benefits and deductions. However, 8 weeks into it, I regret my decision, since the setup hasn't been completed yet. The lack of responsiveness in some cases is astounding and often we have to ask 3, 4, and 5 times for something to be done. I hate to think what will happen after we are "handed off" from the payroll implementation team to the regular schmucks. We still are not able to track PTO and time off and we have been begging for the self-service feature to be turned on for employees so they can change addresses, bank account info, etc. Their training is NONEXISTENT and their manual is abysmal. DO NOT USE THIS COMPANY!!!!! I wish I could go back to Paycom!
The Functionality and Quality of this software package are nice. the help and force support from this software package and therefore the CEIPAL force team helped to unravel the problems two-faced by the shoppers. Initially it absolutely was troublesome on behalf of me to use this software. As there were terribly minute problems with the layers of the things within Ceipal.
Kenexa is is well suited for any organization that has more than 3000 employees globally. I would not recommend this to startups or a growing organization with less than 3000 employees. But once you cross this number, Kenexa becomes useful and is a brilliant tool for global operations - recruiting. I would recommend this tool to any organization that has offices in many countries/geographies as well.
Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
BrassRing's application system for candidates is prone to freezing and crashing in the middle of the application causing potential candidates to lose all progress. I filled out the application myself and witnessed these issues first hand, on top of several complaints I received via phone and email from candidates attempting to apply via the BrassRing service. Also, the Parsing system within the application is not capable of pulling any meaningful information out of text documents.
Each user must be added to each job in order for that job, and the candidates in it, to show up in relevant searches. This becomes a problem when a new team member joins the account and needs access to all of the previous openings just so that they can find candidates already in the system. The account I was working on involved literally hundreds of new openings a month, meaning that any movement of personnel on or off the account would mean having to update potentially thousands of old positions just to allow them to be able to mine the ATS for candidates. I don't see any particular reason why someone with access to the system should have to be given access to each individual job. If a particular position needs to be kept confidential for whatever reason then that individual position should be able to be set to only show to authorized recruiters. The rest of the positions should automatically be searchable by anyone with appropriate access to the ATS to allow for basic level candidate mining and movement.
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
I feel like I am pretty decent with computers and systems. It was fairly easy to use it after about a week or two . But I have seen people struggle with it as well as some people not use it at all. It can be slow at times and not work at times. But Its a fine system.
I never have trouble reaching customer support. They always are able to assist with fixing any problems that arise. There honestly haven't been many issues at all. Only ones I've created :)
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
I've considered moving payroll over to QuickBooks Online so that everything is in one place, but it would probably take too much work considering that our current system works really well. I think QuickBooks would confuse me, honestly. There are other systems that offer different user interfaces that are neat looking, but I haven't done too much research because Heartland Payroll offered me a really good deal for processing since we are a small company.
CEIPAL force over straightforward Cloud HR application with functions like immigration accounts receivable and integrations available. Simple configuration to line up the corporate, workflow and aboard staff makes it likable. A Low & versatile rating backed by support from real individuals makes it enticing.
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated