TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AutoCAD

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AAutoCAD is a CAD product from Autodesk. It allows designers to work in 2D and 3D, and is available on Windows and Mac, but with extensive online collaboration tools.

    $245

    per month

    Bluebeam

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ABluebeam Revu is a PDF management, control, and editing tool. It enables collaboration and markup within shared documents across projects’ life cycles and has takeoff and bid creation capabilities.

    $260

    per year per user

    Revit

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AAutodesk’s Revit is a Building Information Modelling (BIM) tool. It enables architectural, MEP, structural, and engineering design, and provides analysis to support iterative workflows

    $350

    per month

    Pricing
    AutoCADBluebeamRevit
    Editions & Modules
    Monthly Subscription
    $245
    per month per user
    Yearly Subscription
    $1975
    per year per user
    3-Year Subscription
    $5925
    3 years per user
    Basics
    $260
    per year per user
    Core
    $330
    per year per user
    Complete
    $440
    per year per user
    Max
    $590
    per year per user
    Monthly
    $350
    per month
    1-Year
    $2805
    per year
    3-Year
    $8415
    per 3 years
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AutoCADBluebeamRevit
    Free Trial
    YesYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——Pricing available for monthly, annual, or 3-year subscriptions. Longer subscriptions offer greater discounts.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AutoCADBluebeamRevit
    Considered Multiple Products
    Autodesk
    Chose AutoCAD
    I use Revit far more than I use AutoCAD. AutoCAD is great for simple linework, but even then I will often create the lines in Revit and then export to AutoCAD for final touches and printing. AutoCAD is a bit easier for large-format prints, which is why I almost always end up …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD is easy to operate for small to medium sized projects whereas Revit requires more knowledge to operate and design floor plans.
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD is an industry-standard, and there are no alternatives. Revit is used more often for 3D modeling and document set production, Rhino and SketchUp are used more often for conceptual studies. AutoCAD still has a place in our workflow for drawing details, file conversion, …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    Much easier to use then Revit, but much more simple.
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    I think that AutoCAD is much better than all 3 of these programs when outputting 2D drawings and constructions set drawings, but Rhino and Revit are both better for 3D outputs. Revit is a little bit more confined in what you are able to actually design and gives a less original …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    The main difference is that AutoCAD is a general computer-aided design and drafting software used to create precise 2D and 3D drawings, and Revit is software for BIM with tools to create intelligent 3D models of buildings, which can then be used to produce construction …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD is the old industry standard that likely will disappear from use someday but somehow manages relevancy in certain isolated use-cases. It is incredibly likely that Revit (BIM) will supplant it entirely in the long run.
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD was designed to model anything from the tiniest screw to an entire factory and everything in between. It worked great in its day but Revit is made for construction and has many advantages over AutoCAD because of this.
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    When it comes to comparing AutoCAD to Revit, it's like trying to compare an apple to an Orange. While both are a design type of product, they are on different levels, with each having better strengths over the other. There is endless customizability for AutoCAD, while Revit is …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    From my experience, AutoCAD is the premier software for CAD services. If you are required to use BIM products in combination with CAD it is easily interfaced with Revit where some of the other software companies do not offer both CAS and BIM. As a CAD software alone it is the …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD is the industry best and is well integrated with regular updates and fixes if required. Being very developer friendly and having a huge community of enthusiasts behind takes it miles ahead of the competition. Some might get an edge over price but due to this being an …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD is better for drafting construction documents than Rhino. The ability to draft blue print drawings and update them to the specificity we need is a big leg up. Rhino allows me to see the model in 3d instantly where will AutoCAD I need to use a program such as SketchUp to …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    As we all know that AutoCAD is a basic Drafting software used to drawing all of 2D object so all above softwares mentioned as as used as 2nd one after developing the plan on AutoCAD. So I do prepare plans on AutoCAD and develops them on above software. So basically my first …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    for the developing of 2d drawings AutoCAD is more suitable than other software due to its very easy and understandable user interface. besides that, due to the orientation of the software to 2d drawings, the library of commands is better structured and organized, making the …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    This is the most primitive application in the field of design and drafting hence it has the simplest workflow system. It is quite easy to comprehend the processes for any user hence they can access the mistakes easily. Man-to-machine interaction of this software is best among …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    All of the alternatives above work well if you are starting from scratch and are in the market for new software. DraftSight is no longer free. If you have any legacy AutoCAD drawings you are going to encounter problems as we did. Sometimes old files won't open or save …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    It's the best solution for a 2D drawing. Much easier to create 2D plans when you [don't] need to create 3D components. Stable and Functional. Easy to use and remember. All commands are located where they make the best sense. Various access [to] commands is awesome!!! You can …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD is superior to the other two software in means of multi format compatibility and ability to save to previous versions.
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD is more complete and offers more resources in general besides the great majority of professionals in the market using it, which facilitates the transfer of files between teams without any problem and the learning of the software that remains very similar in years. It …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    We have always used AutoCAD for 2D drafting. AutoCAD LT is great for working on 2D projects, especially in the field. We do need full AutoCAD on the workstations to interface with point cloud and support 3D modeling programs.
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD is honestly inferior to these products, given their ability to model complex geometries and generate automatic drawings. AutoCAD is the older generation of drafting software, and while still useful, is becoming less and less the go-to software to begin an architectural …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    Our design engineers have their choice of software to work with and never once was AutoCAD not part of this.
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    AutoCAD has a more user-friendly approach to drawing, and the interface is easy to use and is understandable. BricsCAD is an exact replica of AutoCAD in terms of user commands, however, it is cheaper to license. The industry that we work in, though, expects a certain file type …
    Incentivized
    Chose AutoCAD
    Modeling 2D structures in AutoCAD is more straight forward and easier to start with than other products above, and online tutorials of AutoCAD are everywhere.
    Incentivized
    Bluebeam
    Chose Bluebeam
    I haven’t spent enough time with Revit to give a full comparison. But three architects I’ve worked with have all said they enjoy both programs and Bluebeam was highly recommended for my needs in the company.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    There is no comparison. The editing tools, batch tools drafting tools, personal environment profiles, settings, printing, calibrating, direct connecting apps that links Bluebeam to AutoCAD and Revit. This is an extremely powerful program that is amazingly helpful and I probably …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam is a more advanced PDF editor and better suited for the engineering and construction industry. It has far more tools and better capabilities for collaborative viewing, marking up, and sharing of documents.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam Revu has essentially replaced Adobe Acrobat as our default PDF viewer and editor, because its robust suite of architecturally-focused tools allow for better review of documents and creation of simple graphic diagrams. The scale and measurement tools are especially …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    It is better than Acrobat in my opinion. More features and more user-friendly.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    PDF file sharing is really easy and simple, so users can markup and others can view them in real-time. Also, editing PDF files to crop, batch, remove, or replace pages is really efficient compared to Adobe Acrobat DC. Plus, the licensing fee is pretty small compared to Adobe …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam

    Revu was much easier to use, more cost-effective, and is more generally used in the construction and design industry than Adobe. We found Adobe to be more of a resource hog, as well as being bloated with offers for other Adobe applications, which many times would slow down a …

    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam is a good in-between of Adobe and Photoshop. If you're not looking to do photo editing, but need more capabilities than just line work, Bluebeam is perfect.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Much more complete than the competition.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam Revu is easy to use and a lot cheaper compared to other products available in the market.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    This program directly replaces our use of Adobe company wide. We have also phased out PlanGrid for the most part as the tools of Procore and Bluebeam both have been more user friendly for our teams.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    If Bluebeam can be compared to any other PDF editing software, the closest competitor would be Adobe Acrobat. Unfortunately, this really isn't a fair comparison because to tools available (and user interface) in Bluebeam FAR outweigh the ones available in Adobe Acrobat. This …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam is a far superior product to Adobe. I don't even think they should be in the same category for anyone in the construction industry.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam is Adobe on steroids. It offers way more options and is more user-friendly. I will admit it takes a little to learn the interface of Bluebeam because it offers so much but coming from AutoCad this was nothing new to me. Once you get a handle on that aspect, Bluebeam is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam Revu simply blows away all of the other on-screen take-off software programs I have used in the past. There really is no comparison. Bluebeam Revu also is far more robust for the AEC industry than other PDF editors (i.e. Adobe products). They also have excellent …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam Revu beats DWF review hand down. Bluebeam can communicate with any program that can create a PDF while DWF is exclusive to AutoDesk products thus forcing you to use a different software when working with other programs. The features of Bluebeam Revu compared to Adobe …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluembeam is as good as Adobe at most things and better at some.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    I see no purpose to check out alternative programs. It would take company policy to get me to use a different pdf viewer. I went from Adobe Pro or Adobe X to Bluebeam Revu and never looked back. Maybe I did not know how to use all of the functions of Adobe, but that is Adobe's …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam Revu is much more tailored for drafting than Acrobat (the last time I used it in an office), so it caters to architectural markup and review very gratuitously. Tools are quick to find and essential markup symbols are not missing. As a PDF viewer, Bluebeam Revu is much …
    Incentivized
    Autodesk
    Chose Revit
    Revit is way better than AutoCAD due to the collaboration features. panel schedule creations, easier 3D rendering and much more
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit is specifically for the design and documentation of buildings. As Revit's predecessor, AutoCAD has similar functionality for creating construction documents but Revit has the advantage of speed and simultaneously creating a 3D model when drawing walls, rooms, and floors …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit has more features in compare to another software like AutoCAD. The more features get you more flexibility in your work and impact your time management. The more you do in less time and the more your quality with this software. So I think Revit is going in a good direction.
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit is a more creative tool compared to others software like AutoCAD. More people can work simultaneously on Revit files but in AutoCAD only 1 person can work on 1 file. File management of Revit is good whereas in AutoCAD multiple AutoCAD files are created for the same 1 …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    This is because Revit is easier to work with than AutoCAD and can easily draw a 3D model from Revit. Also, Revit can do more work than AutoCAD.
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit is easy to operate and involves various families for different disciplines. It also involves one single model where different users can open, work, and synchronize at the same time, making collaboration easy. Also, users can view other disciplines in the same model making …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    There are really no competitors to Revit for large complex building projects. It is essentially an industry standard, and we would not be able to complete our work or collaborate with our consultants effectively if we did not use Revit. AutoCAD is still used in the office for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit, like AutoCAD, is the most straight forward, intuitive of the BIM software available in today's market. It is widely excepted at a norm and is the most universally used in the engineering trades that we work with. As our clients start to demand that their projects are …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    AutoCAD was great back in the day but had such a wide range of uses. Revit is based in construction and runs better for that function because of it. If I was to have to switch back to AutoCAD I cannot imagine how much more time I would have to spend in order to produce the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit brings collaboration to projects on a whole other level never seen in AutoCAD. Revit allows not only another live perspective of projects but also a huge advantage in simultaneous user production of drawings.
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    AutoCAD, MicroStation. These are both good programs but they are limited to two dimensions for the most part and I choose to use Revit for its ease in working in 3D, annotation, and organization. If you are looking to have a consistent good-looking set of drawings in 2D or 3D, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit is the fancier version of AutoCAD. It has more features and is much better for fully integrated 3D modeling.
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit is used primarily for creation of contract documents and documents that need to be used to build in the field. Sketch Up is great for a quick concept sketch, but lacks the details that Revit has which are needed to construct. AutoCAD is a great tool for details as well, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    AutoCAD is great but it does not create sections and elevations while designing in 2D.
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit is the most set up for full size drawing sets and ease of translating drawings to sheets.
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    TEKLA specializes in rebar clashes. Revit is an overall package. It perfoms almost everything you need in 3D modeling. TEKLA has limited itself in Rebar detailing. Revit also has rebar detailing family that is almost the same with TEKLA. You can incorporate plans in your Revit …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    First and foremost, Revit is BIM-based software, which in itself offers significant advantages over 3D modelling programmes such as Rhino or SketchUp. Project management takes place on several levels as well as in different time phases (for example, it is also possible to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit makes 3D modeling accessible and efficient, allowing users to create complex models without needing to navigate overly complicated systems. Its intuitive tools help streamline the modeling process, enabling designers to focus more on design intent. This ease of use is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit is great for documentation. I also use Rhino 3D for rapid prototype scenarios that can be imported in, but in the end everything should be documented in Revit because it really is easy.
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Fabrication is slow and takes more manpower to work because it has more manual work compare to Revit. Fabrication and Revit can be used for the same work but Revit will do it faster and real-time syncing method make it easy to work for multiple people and in Fabrication, areas …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    I'd say the advantages on the side of Revit is
    • Huge demand in the market
    • strong development platform (lots of add-ins),
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Autodesk Revit is more user-friendly than the mentioned software and is easy to create a custom family within the software. Multiple users can work at the same time in Revit, as with the other software mentioned, each user has to work on a separate file. Faster workflow and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    Revit is one of the most powerful tools in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction Field. It is outmatched by none. There is definitely a learning curve, and it cannot be picked up by an average employee and learned without formal training. Revit can do more on the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    The choice fell on Revit because as an artist, it was important for me to make a 3D design, without delving into the project documentation.
    Incentivized
    Chose Revit
    As I stated previously, it's hard to come up with a competitor for Revit. Revit was developed by Charles River Software back in 1997 and was bought by Autodesk in 2002. It's only real competition is with Bentley Systems or Tekla. Bently is just not used by the industry and …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    45 Answers
    94%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    28 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    38 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    25 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    43 Answers
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    28 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    88%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    29 Answers
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    17 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    38 Answers
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    89%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Features
    AutoCADBluebeamRevit
    Computer-Aided Design Software
    Comparison of Computer-Aided Design Software features of AutoCAD and Bluebeam and Revit
    Feature
    AutoCAD
    7.1
    7 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Bluebeam
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    -
    Ratings
    3D Modeling6.17 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    2D Drafting8.77 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Rendering and Visualization6.47 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Parametric Design7.57 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaboration and Sharing8.87 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Compatibility with other software and formats8.87 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Assembly Design6.77 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Simulation and Analysis4.76 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Documentation and Annotation7.67 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization and Extensions5.37 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of AutoCAD and Bluebeam and Revit
    Feature
    AutoCAD
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    26% above category average
    Revit
    5.8
    11 Ratings
    28% below category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings10.01 Ratings4.46 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings10.01 Ratings3.38 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.18 Ratings
    Data exportability00 Ratings10.01 Ratings7.411 Ratings
    Construction Project & Field Management
    Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of AutoCAD and Bluebeam and Revit
    Feature
    AutoCAD
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    9.8
    54 Ratings
    25% above category average
    Revit
    7.5
    53 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings9.752 Ratings7.951 Ratings
    Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings9.854 Ratings8.344 Ratings
    Issue tracking & punchlists00 Ratings9.733 Ratings7.132 Ratings
    Photo documentation00 Ratings9.836 Ratings9.021 Ratings
    Jobsite reports00 Ratings9.831 Ratings8.418 Ratings
    Document sharing00 Ratings9.947 Ratings7.646 Ratings
    RFI tools00 Ratings9.835 Ratings6.625 Ratings
    Collaboration & approvals00 Ratings9.842 Ratings8.742 Ratings
    As-built drawings00 Ratings9.845 Ratings8.750 Ratings
    Mobile app00 Ratings10.027 Ratings5.017 Ratings
    Submittal design and management00 Ratings9.821 Ratings7.422 Ratings
    Checklists00 Ratings9.93 Ratings7.49 Ratings
    Change orders00 Ratings9.93 Ratings6.59 Ratings
    Meeting Minutes00 Ratings00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Specifications00 Ratings00 Ratings6.514 Ratings
    Estimating
    Comparison of Estimating features of AutoCAD and Bluebeam and Revit
    Feature
    AutoCAD
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    9.6
    29 Ratings
    24% above category average
    Revit
    8.3
    37 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Takeoff tools00 Ratings9.728 Ratings8.737 Ratings
    Job costing00 Ratings8.45 Ratings7.828 Ratings
    Cost databases00 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.021 Ratings
    Cost calculator00 Ratings10.02 Ratings8.122 Ratings
    Bid creation00 Ratings9.98 Ratings9.016 Ratings
    Human Resource Management
    Comparison of Human Resource Management features of AutoCAD and Bluebeam and Revit
    Feature
    AutoCAD
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    7.2
    6 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Employee demographic data00 Ratings00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Employment history00 Ratings00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
    Job profiles and administration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
    Organizational charting00 Ratings00 Ratings6.54 Ratings
    Organization and location management00 Ratings00 Ratings6.95 Ratings
    Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings00 Ratings6.13 Ratings
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of AutoCAD and Bluebeam and Revit
    Feature
    AutoCAD
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    7.2
    4 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Pay calculation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
    Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings00 Ratings6.64 Ratings
    Off-cycle/On-Demand payment00 Ratings00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.14 Ratings
    Direct deposit files00 Ratings00 Ratings7.14 Ratings
    Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
    Reimbursement management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.63 Ratings
    Asset Management
    Comparison of Asset Management features of AutoCAD and Bluebeam and Revit
    Feature
    AutoCAD
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    6.6
    4 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Tracking of all physical assets00 Ratings00 Ratings6.64 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AutoCADBluebeamRevit
    Small Businesses
    Onshape
    Score6.4 out of 10
    CMiC Construction Platform
    Score7.5 out of 10
    CMiC Construction Platform
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Onshape
    Score6.4 out of 10
    Autodesk Build
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Autodesk Build
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    PTC Creo
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Revit
    Score8.9 out of 10
    InEight
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AutoCADBluebeamRevit
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.7
    (88 ratings)
    9.9
    (66 ratings)
    9.0
    (55 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    1.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.3
    (9 ratings)
    9.8
    (4 ratings)
    7.7
    (8 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.9
    (13 ratings)
    1.0
    (11 ratings)
    7.0
    (8 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AutoCADBluebeamRevit
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Autodesk
    Once again, for jobs/companies where you are doing a lot of design and modelling of tanks, pipework or filling machine or basic electronics its fantastic as a 3D and 2D modelling tool, however once again when it comes to testing these actual products in the real world, I feel like AutoCAD is let down by its clunky fitting and spec management and also in very limited in-house engineering simulations.
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    The program is great for editing construction drawings, stamping/approving official documents and overlaying revised documents to see design changes. You can use it as an estimating takeoff tool, estimating database, document control, cloud document storage, the list goes on! Bluebeam poses many applications for the user to utilize for the desired needs. There may be some other software that has one specific function that can perform the specific task better, but Bluebeam is a holistic program with many tools for use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Revit is very well suited to creating designs and construction documents for standard buildings. Buildings that need to utilize phasing in their construction process are also well suited to this software. Revit is not as well suited to buildings that have irregular shapes or components that need to be highly detailed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Autodesk
    • Compatibility of different file formats, and also exports to different file formats.
    • CLI Commands as well as internal functions which are exposed can be used for automation of various tasks.
    • The new 2025 comes with .NET Core support which helps AutoCAD to connect with Cloud based features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    • Once you set Bluebeam Revu as your default PDF handler, it launches immediately when clicking a PDF to open. The speed with which it opens documents is impressive.
    • Creating PDF's out of other documents, such as Word, Excel, JPG's, etc. is simple.
    • Digitally signing documents is a simple, secure process. You can keep your signature password-protected, yet still access it quickly.
    • The Bluebeam Revu mobile application ( I use the iOS version on an iPad Pro), is awesome. Not only does it handle PDF's like you would expect it to, it allows for effortless digital signing of documents on the fly. Nice to be able to quickly sign a document and email right back out from the tablet no matter where I am.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • Revit allows users to create real buildings and is very much rooted in making functional buildings.
    • Revit allows users to collaborate both within their own firms and with other types of firms as well. This is particularly useful for coordinating buildings between architecture and engineering firms.
    • Revit integrates fairly well with other programs such as AutoCAD and Sketchup. This allows us to bring in elements modeled in other programs into our revit models.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Autodesk
    • User Interface Customisation: AutoCAD's user interface could benefit from more robust customisation options. Allowing users to rearrange toolbars, menus, and panels according to their specific workflows and preferences would enhance productivity.
    • Enhanced 3D Modeling Tools: While AutoCAD is capable of 3D modeling, it's not as intuitive or feature-rich as dedicated 3D modeling software. Streamlining the process and adding more advanced modeling tools would be a welcome improvement.
    • Enhanced Collaboration and Version Control: AutoCAD could improve its collaboration tools, such as real-time editing and version tracking, to facilitate smoother teamwork, especially in multi-disciplinary projects.
    • Intelligent Object Libraries: AutoCAD could benefit from an expanded and more intelligent library of standard objects and components. This would save time for designers who often have to create custom components from scratch.
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    • If you have several tabs open and you try to drag one out for a side by side view then you do not have all the modification options and you have to combine them back together.
    • There is a lag time when hitting the print option.
    • There is also a lag time when opening files, sometimes I think the window is frozen.
    • I wish the basic version also had basic file editing, as in editing a document as Adobe does.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • Versioning - Revit is not backwards compatible. This creates issues if you are working with people who are using older versions as you cannot save to a previous version. I understand why this is and I do not see this ever changing, however, Its very annoying.
    • Autodesk - They are the 800 pound gorilla in the industry. The lack of competition inhibits development and it seems Autodesk has put more effort into its BIM 360 platform and Revit development has suffered because of it. I would like to see better competition so Autodesk would step up its game.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Autodesk
    Because rarely we [would] rather wait for a whole year to update, sometimes the new updates don't bring many new features and we are still ok with the current version. Also the change of interface is always something that takes time for every partner in the company to get comfortable with. So those are the main reasons we may want to keep the same version.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    Bluebeam is a powerful PDF viewer and mark-up tool. We are more familiar with it than Adobe Acrobat Pro or other viewers, and it has more features geared towards construction document managers than Acrobat Pro does.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    We will almost certainly be renewing all of our current seats of Revit and will likely be adding seats as we look to get more and more of our staff trained and using Revit. The software is starting to become the standard for our projects as we move forward as more and more of our clients are requesting or accepting use of it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Autodesk
    It is very usable once you understand the program. I believe there is room for improvement in the 2D to 3D modeling capability. We have to use other apps to 3D model and that can be time consuming and sometimes AutoCAD doesn't transfer work that well between apps. They can improve there.
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    I'm constantly finding that Bluebeam Revu does more than I knew it could. And when I find something that it can't do, I've found that Bluebeam truly listens to its user base and will work to incorporate any good suggestion when feasible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    It is a professional environment, but far from easy and overly complex in many places. The system is often too deep in settings and overrides (see Visibility/Graphics in combination with linked files, filters, color overrides and view templates). I don't really like the dialog-in-dialog interface and its spartan looks. But it works well overall if you know what you are doing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    Revit seems to always be available when I need it. I have not experiences an outage. There are occasions where we need our internal IT department to trouble shoot a file on our Revit dedicated server and that sometimes causes a delay however that is not a software access issue
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    Revit is a fairly graphics heavy piece of software. It is powerful in its capabilities but as a result it takes a lot of the graphics card, the memory, etc. For all that it can do and the specs of my computer I find it pretty good from a performance standpoint
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Autodesk
    AutoCAD has the issue of crashing or slowing down the design procedure once a heavy design that includes several disciplines or multiple families/blocks is involved. Customer services gets the feedback from the crash reports but this issue seems like it has never been addressed in the software updates past several years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    Its hard for me to give a rating on this one as we rarely have to use the support feature for Bluebeam. However, when we have used it, they have been ultra supportive in helping us get exactly what we needed. I know another engineer was trying to figure out a feature and the rep gave a detailed tutorial on how to complete the task
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Autodesk has always had a good support system in place. There is a massive user base for Revit, and there are thousands of forum threads and other discussions online about any and every problem that you could ever run into. For being such a large program with so many different options, there aren't many roadblocks or pitfalls that users can fall into.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    The training was Revit Essentials and it was very beneficial. I would say that it is best to get the training right before you know you will be using Revit as learning the basis then applying what you learned immediately is the most effective and best value for your money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    The online training is hit or miss. I feel that its better to be live to be able to pace and ask questions to a live person as you are learning hwo to do things. Its not natural to learn Revit especially if you know AutoCAD so my suggestion is the live training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Autodesk
    the implementation was realy easy , to set up our workstation we pay for the licenses we are about to use , there was a little bit of delay to get the payment processed to receive the serial but after that the install runs without any problem , so you can fell secure there will be not issue with the implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    Implementing Revit as your main drafting software (i.e. moving to BIM from CAD) may be a tough decision if you have learned drafting. It is a different way to approach and think about developing a project. However, if you are able to adapt to a new way of thinking and get used to it by working through a few projects than it is as efficient as CAD in most areas in general and will also be both better/worse in some areas
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Autodesk
    I use Revit far more than I use AutoCAD. AutoCAD is great for simple linework, but even then I will often create the lines in Revit and then export to AutoCAD for final touches and printing. AutoCAD is a bit easier for large-format prints, which is why I almost always end up using it after starting in Revit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    We feel there is not another program out there that would compare to Bluebeam at this current time. Some of the other programs out there do not include studio or the overlaying process which is one of our main uses. The ease of hyperlinking makes this product stand out the most.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Revit is used primarily for creation of contract documents and documents that need to be used to build in the field. Sketch Up is great for a quick concept sketch, but lacks the details that Revit has which are needed to construct. AutoCAD is a great tool for details as well, but does not have as many building capabilities as Revit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    While I am not directly involved with the deployment of Revit, it seems that our internal IT department has appreciated the ability to increase or decrease the number of seats. I have never had an issue with the deployment if and when needed, especially regarding the availability of a set
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Autodesk
    • As an educational institute there are no overall business objectives.
    • As a negative, the licensing is expensive and we have to limit the number of computers we put it on.
    • As a positive, many of our students will have a leg up when entering into programs or companies that use this software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    • A major positive aspect is being able to take your computer home without taking the entire set of paper drawings. They have made it so easy to navigate a set of drawings that I can work at home using only the digital drawings.
    • Collaboration with owners and architects has been a great feature. Setting up a Bluebeam studio and having everyone get in and mark things up, then having the architect be able to go in and see what markups have been added, has made the constructability review process much much better.
    • Even when not working on drawings, Bluebeam is a very good tool for working with standard PDF documents. The markup tools are very easy to use.
    • The negative aspect is the takeoff function because some people would like estimators to use the Bluebeam takeoff because it would make their job easier down the road; however, the actual act of doing a full scale takeoff in Bluebeam would require much more time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • Though implementation of Revit is usually front heavy which means a lot of effort is put in at the front end of the project, the return of investment towards the remainder of the project is really good. All the effort in decisions made at the beginning of the project pays off with Revit incorporating all the building information in the model so the team can glean from this throughout the life of the project is a major plus.
    • A major negative is the many false assumptions that comes with using Revit on a project. Just like any other computer application, Revit is only a tool. It's only as good as the operators who implement this tool. Revit is not a cureall for fixing all the problems that still can come out throughout the life of a design & construction project.
    • A major positive for our office involving the use of Revit is the ability for our staff from multiple offices to work on the same project central file. We don't need to maintain an expensive server. With the addition of Collaboration for Revit the entire project can be stored in the cloud for our staff to access and complete the project faster than ever.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Bluebeam Screenshots

    Screenshot of Bluebeam Cloud with Markup ListScreenshot of Bluebeam Cloud with Tool ChestScreenshot of Bluebeam Revu MarkupScreenshot of Bluebeam Revu Studio Session