Whether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.
N/A
Vistaprint
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Vistaprint, a Cimpress company, helps small business owners create expertly designed, up-to-date custom direct mail marketing items, such as photos, business cards, labels & stickers, and related promotional products.
$17
per month billed yearly
Pricing
Avenseo (discontinued)
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Vistaprint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
Light
$17
per month billed yearly
Light
$24
per month
Core
$36
per month
Business
$36
per month billed yearly
Core
$39
per month billed yearly
Business
$43
per month
Business Elite
$159
per month billed yearly
Business Elite
$172
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Avenseo (discontinued)
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Vistaprint
Free Trial
No
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Avenseo (discontinued)
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Vistaprint
Features
Avenseo (discontinued)
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Vistaprint
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Avenseo (discontinued)
9.7
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.0
163 Ratings
5% below category average
Vistaprint
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
10.01 Ratings
9.0163 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
10.01 Ratings
8.5135 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
10.01 Ratings
8.4139 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
10.01 Ratings
7.9126 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
10.01 Ratings
8.197 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
9.01 Ratings
8.175 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
10.01 Ratings
8.4147 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
10.01 Ratings
8.1133 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
7.01 Ratings
8.0125 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
8.01 Ratings
6.217 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
10.01 Ratings
8.418 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
10.01 Ratings
7.6145 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
10.01 Ratings
7.9112 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
10.01 Ratings
8.2112 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
10.01 Ratings
7.890 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
10.01 Ratings
7.574 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
10.01 Ratings
7.896 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
10.01 Ratings
7.250 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
10.01 Ratings
8.180 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Avenseo (discontinued)
10.0
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.2
152 Ratings
7% below category average
Vistaprint
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
10.01 Ratings
8.4147 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
10.01 Ratings
7.7122 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
10.01 Ratings
9.1144 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
10.01 Ratings
7.8111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
When a business wants to grow they need more conversion no matter what. In this regard, this A/B and MVT platform is a game-changer. If your business is on the right track then do not hesitate to jump into this software to witness a significant upgrade in your growth.
I think it can serve the whole spectrum of experiences from people who are just getting used to web experimentation. It's really easy to pick up and use. If you're more experienced then it works well because it just gets out of the way and lets you really focus on the experimentation side of things. So yeah, strongly recommend. I think it is well suited both to small businesses and large enterprises as well. I think it's got a really low barrier to entry. It's very easy to integrate on your website and get results quickly. Likewise, if you are a big business, it's incrementally adoptable, so you can start out with one component of optimizing and you can build there and start to build in things like data CMS to augment experimentation as well. So it's got a really strong a pathway to grow your MarTech platform if you're a small company or a big company.
Well suited: Business Cards Address Stamps Vehicle Magnets Brochures Pretty much any of your basic collateral the doesn't require a lot of finish work Less appropriate Jobs where you really should look at a hard proof before approving
The Platform contains drag-and-drop editor options for creating variations, which ease the A/B tests process, as it does not require any coding or development resources.
Establishing it is so simple that even a non-technical person can do it perfectly.
It provides real-time results and analytics with robust dashboard access through which you can quickly analyze how different variations perform. With this, your team can easily make data-driven decisions Fastly.
Implementing Avenseo is quite easy; for most of our clients they have nothing to do but to add two lines of code and let us do the configuration of the test and the frontend developpement. You can easily check your variations as if it were already live, using a control box so you don't have unexpected bugs when your test goes live !
I rated this question because at this stage, Optimizely does most everything we need so I don't foresee a need to migrate to a new tool. We have the infrastructure already in place and it is a sizeable lift to pivot to another tool with no guarantee that it will work as good or even better than Optimizely
Optimizely Web Experimentation's visual editor is handy for non-technical or quick iterative testing. When it comes to content changes it's as easy as going into wordpress, clicking around, and then seeing your changes live--what you see is what you get. The preview and approval process for sharing built experiments is also handy for sharing experiments across teams for QA purposes or otherwise.
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's availability as a 10 out of 10. The software is reliable and does not experience any application errors or unplanned outages. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's performance as a 9 out of 10. Pages load quickly, reports are complete in a reasonable time frame, and the software does not slow down any other software or systems that it integrates with. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
They always are quick to respond, and are so friendly and helpful. They always answer the phone right away. And [they are] always willing to not only help you with your problem, but if you need ideas they have suggestions as well.
The tool itself is not very difficult to use so training was not very useful in my opinion. It did not also account for success events more complex than a click (which my company being ecommerce is looking to examine more than a mere click).
In retrospect: - I think I should have stressed more demo's / workshopping with the Optimizely team at the start. I felt too confident during demo stages, and when came time to actually start, I was a bit lost. (The answer is likely I should have had them on-hand for our first install.. they offered but I thought I was OK.) - Really getting an understanding / asking them prior to install of how to make it really work for checkout pages / one that uses dynamic content or user interaction to determine what the UI does. Could have saved some time by addressing this at the beginning, as some things we needed to create on our site for Optimizely to "use" as a trigger for the variation test. - Having a number of planned/hoped-for tests already in-hand before working with Optimizely team. Sharing those thoughts with them would likely have started conversations on additional things we needed to do to make them work (rather than figuring that out during the actual builds). Since I had development time available, I could have added more things to the baseline installation since my developers were already "looking under the hood" of the site.
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you need to confidently make changes
Adobe Spark is limited to templates and customizable features and shutter stock has a lot of images and assets but never what I need. I like being able to use what I have and Vistaprint will tell me what will work and what won’t work in case of resolving issues or not and the others aren’t as easy to use as well.
We can use it flexibly across lines of business and have it in use across two departments. We have different use cases and slightly different outcomes, but can unify our results based on impact to the bottom line. Finally, we can generate value from anywhere in the org for any stakeholders as needed.
We're able to share definitive annualized revenue projections with our team, showing what would happen if we put a test into Production
Showing the results of a test on a new page or feature prior to full implementation on a site saves developer time (if a test proves the new element doesn't deliver a significant improvement.
Making a change via the WYSIWYG interface allows us to see multiple changes without developer intervention.
Positive Impact: I don't need a lot of materials for my business. But when I do need them, it's nice to be able to choose from a good selection. And the product is pretty good.