BlazeMeter vs. ignio AIOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BlazeMeter
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
ignio AIOps, from Digitate in Santa Clara, is a solution designed to improve business agility by creating a unified view of the IT estate, connecting business functions to applications and infrastructure. This is combined with behavior profile of systems and applications that is continuously learnt using this blueprint. ignio aims to improve the transparency of complex Enterprise IT landscapes.N/A
Pricing
BlazeMeterignio AIOps
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlazeMeterignio AIOps
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlazeMeterignio AIOps
Considered Both Products
BlazeMeter
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
Chose BlazeMeter
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did.
Chose BlazeMeter
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
ignio AIOps
Chose ignio AIOps
We generally use Ignio AIOps. It is flexible and works well for AIOPS.
Features
BlazeMeterignio AIOps
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
BlazeMeter
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
ignio AIOps
-
Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Version Control9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Collaboration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BlazeMeterignio AIOps
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
ScienceLogic AI Platform
ScienceLogic AI Platform
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BlazeMeterignio AIOps
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlazeMeterignio AIOps
Likelihood to Recommend
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Read full review
-Autonomous alert and incident management related to infrastructure, NW, and applications. -Excellent fit to handle CPU, memory, and disk space alert management - proactive and predictive. -Several automation features (self-healing) - CPU/Memory modifications; disk extensions; patch management -Provisioning of user access and infrastructure servers, etc.
Read full review
Pros
  • Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
  • Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
Read full review
  • ignio handles 100+ use cases covering the entire organization including applications and infrastructure.
  • Centralize the dashboard to view and executed the health of systems in our environment.
  • It handles CA services desk Incidents and requests. Using automated tools with power shell scripts.
  • ignio event management helps the organization to manage the alerts well and make an informed decision.
Read full review
Cons
  • BlazeMeter should not require the purchase of 2 dedicated IPs for each suite of performance tests.
  • BlazeMeter should make custom packages cheaper than they are today when purchased for an enterprise and should include dedicated IPs in the package.
  • BlazeMerer should have integration with Jenkins Pipeline 2.0.
Read full review
  • There is a lot more the desktop tool can do. For example, we need to apply an upgrade to get the tool to talk to our infrastructure while employees are working from home. The tool was initially installed with the assumption that the desktops would be in UserLand. Instead after COVID-19 the desktop/laptops have been used for over a year on people's home networks. As of right now, we have to sync when the devices are connected to VPN. Moving forward with the upgrade, we will be getting this data over TLS when they are connected to the untrusted networks.
  • The concept of ignio AlOps requires OCM efforts within most operational teams. This isn't necessarily the fault of the tool itself, but when implementing ignio, or any AIOps tool, the team will get a lot of pushback as an outside team is centralizing the operational improvements. The tool should have a centralized intake process that will allow the collection, ranking, and management of automation opportunities. ignio AlOps should then simulate the proposed efficiencies from implementing something within the backlog. Right now a lot of local teams are having a hard time getting on the same page as the enterprise teams, and a common methodology for prioritizing (even if overly simplistic) would go a long way to enterprise planning.
  • These tools are very new and things get added to them all the time. There should be a way for the product's stakeholders and process owners to understand the additional value ignio AlOps is gaining over time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It is a very good product and it helps our organization.
Read full review
Usability
Easy to setup to do API Performance Testing. Dashboard to showcase results Capability to showcase runtime results
Read full review
ignio AIOps version upgrades were a heavy lift. Having to learn a new language versus an industry standard language took time. More consideration on overall internal long-term support needs to be determined.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
It was up than Dynatrace
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Looks good at the moment
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We have built a healthy relationship with the vendor support team throughout the implementation phase, all incidents raised were resolved within the SLA without a fail
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Implementation team has provided necessary training & enablement.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Online training materials are shared by the implementation team and it was good.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
I am happy with the way team has implemented and shared the product for our organization. However, would like to see it get extended to the other line of business too.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)
Read full review
We generally use Ignio AIOps. It is flexible and works well for AIOPS.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Quite Scalable!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously.
  • BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users.
  • BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed.
Read full review
  • ignio has had a positive impact on our organization by saving 7,000+ hours within Operations and automatically resolving 84% of our service requests.
  • ignio has increased our alert coverage by over 60%.
Read full review
ScreenShots