TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Carbonite by OpenText vs. Contentsquare, now with Hotjar

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Carbonite by OpenText

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/ACarbonite by OpenText (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a cloud backup solution for small business. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite users can protect virtually any type of file.N/A

    Contentsquare

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AContentsquare is an enterprise experience intelligence and Digital Analytics platform designed to track, visualize, and optimize user journeys across websites and mobile applications. The platform captures digital interaction telemetry—such as clicks, scrolls, hovers, and page drop-offs—without manual event tagging to power Web Analytics, session replays, funnel visualization, and experience monitoring.N/A
    Pricing
    Carbonite by OpenTextContentsquare
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Carbonite by OpenTextContentsquare
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Carbonite by OpenTextContentsquare
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Contentsquare
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    53 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    50 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    53 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    44 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    42 Answers
    Features
    Carbonite by OpenTextContentsquare
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Carbonite by OpenText and Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    Feature
    Carbonite by OpenText
    8.7
    24 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Universal recovery10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Instant recovery3.311 Ratings00 Ratings
    Recovery verification9.89 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business application protection9.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations10.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification9.821 Ratings00 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud9.423 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression9.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Snapshots10.011 Ratings00 Ratings
    Flexible deployment8.812 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management dashboard8.812 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform support8.813 Ratings00 Ratings
    Retention options6.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Encryption9.914 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise Backup
    Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Carbonite by OpenText and Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    Feature
    Carbonite by OpenText
    8.4
    3 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Continuous data protection8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Replication8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Operational reporting and analytics6.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Malware protection9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-location capabilities8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ransomware Recovery10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Carbonite by OpenText and Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    Feature
    Carbonite by OpenText
    -
    Ratings
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Mobile Application00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Carbonite by OpenText and Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    Feature
    Carbonite by OpenText
    -
    Ratings
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    9.7
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Heatmap tool00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Click analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Scroll maps00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Conversion tracking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Goal tracking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Session Recording and Replay00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    User Segmentation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Carbonite by OpenTextContentsquare
    Small Businesses
    Acronis Cyber Protect
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Fullstory
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    MSP360 Backup
    Score7 out of 10
    Quantum Metric
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Glassbox
    Score6.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Carbonite by OpenTextContentsquare
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (49 ratings)
    8.2
    (118 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.0
    (8 ratings)
    5.1
    (13 ratings)
    Usability
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    9.5
    (8 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Carbonite by OpenTextContentsquare
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    More than enough for small companies with several on-prem servers. In 2021, it wouldn't be wise to pit all important data to a single backup service. Carbonite Server is solid, but it's not 100% reliable so I'd definitely recommend having multiple backup services either on the cloud in conjunction with other backup services so the user has multiple safety nets in case of disaster and failed granular restorations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    Hotjar is good for a first pass at understanding user sentiment or locating potential usability issues. There are features such as "rage clicked" which shows recordings or instances when a user rage clicked or had an issue with your site. Hotjar has also been helpful to launch intercept surveys on mobile, desktop, and app, which not all competitor software allow. Hotjar recordings are fun to watch. "Watching Hotjar like Netflix" is a favorite pastime at work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Simple administrative web interface - It's easy to provision users, look at data usage stats, disable users, and update policies to control what folders users are allowed to backup, and what options they can access
    • Easy client installation - Installing and updating clients was very simple. The client would notify the user when a new update was approved by the site admins, and they typically went very smoothly.
    • Good performance - Backups went fairly fast, and were generally invisible to the user, other than the icon updating on files to indicate whether the current version of a file was backed up or not.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    • Heat mapping is great on Hotjar. It is a good place to start when you are looking at the UX & CRO on your website. You can see the % of people clicking on elements on a page, how far they scroll, and mouse movements.
    • Hotjar is great for session recordings. These record the mouse movements, clicks, pages and scrolls of a user in video format. You can watch these to investigate what works well on a site and identify potential roadblocks and bugs.
    • Hotjar is great as it ensures that users details are anonymous; for instance, if you are watching a session recording, you cannot see what a user types in a form field, as Hotjar blanks this out.
    • Hotjar has a poll function, so you can have polls on your website.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • While overall file restoration is easy to do, obtaining earlier versions is not as user friendly as it could be. You need to enter a date and click search to bring up the latest versions as of the date entered. That’s fine, but what is missing is the ability to see all versions of an individual file. If I am looking for a past file version I want to be able to view the file history as a subset of that file (in other words I should be able to click a + sign and expand to see past versions of the file). Otherwise I am just guessing which dates the file was changed in the past. Sometimes that’s OK, but Mozy needs to build in this enhanced, but necessary feature.
    • A couple of years ago, for non enterprise users, Mozy made radical storage and pricing changes forcing myself and many users off their system, as the price for the same storage was going up significantly. So be careful when using Mozy as past experience has shown they are willing to make major changes regardless of the negative impact on their users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    • Hotjar is primarily used for web-based experiences. Not that easy to use on mobile apps.
    • I'd love to see Hotjar integrated with Google Analytics for an even deeper view.
    • Hotjar is primarily used by smaller organizations...pricing can get steep quickly for larger organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    Carbonite Server Backup does not integrate or support any reporting; it is not good at it. We required monthly and quarterly reports for audit. If we fail in that we get fined or we have to pay a certain amount of money to customer. It does not support cloud instances and we are using N2WS for the cloud instances. This is an additional burden for customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    Out of all the vendor we deal with they are one of the best when it comes to customers service. Reliable,you can reach them by telephone easily, Great overall can not say anything to the contrary. Usibility is excellent. I recommend them highly whether you need a simple backup ofr more complex for servers etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    It is fairly easy to use, easy to explain, and easy to learn even for a non-techie like me. I admit I was a little intimidated when it was recommended by my developers, but I learned afterwards that there really was nothing to worry about. My experience has been awesome so far!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    I usually find what I need to know by looking in the Carbonite knowledge base online. We haven't had any major problems, usually we just need clarification on a point or more details about a feature so we look it up. We haven't had to call in for help in quite awhile.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    Hotjar is a SaaS-based company, and as such has a good support service. Users can quickly submit support tickets through Hotjar's online portal. Enterprise customers get access to additional support members and have SLAs to support their larger, more complex needs. Overall, Hotjar is extremely reliable and I've never had to reach out to customer support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    OpenText
    We had appliance and we just needed to setup the Director Console which was straight forward and easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    Netbak is a great product but we also had a secondary issue of having to backup several PC's on site and at remote locations. Carbonite helped with both and gave us one central admin console to be able to check the progress of all our backups, where netbak would have required us to setup a tunnel or use the internet to move data back to our main office.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • We have a safety net that we didn't have before.
    • Key players are now backed up through an automated system that was easy to silently install.
    • The resources used impacted our exchange server negatively and slowed email until it was disabled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentsquare
    • Our UX team can now use hard data to back up and validate design decisions that we make. Our role as usability experts is becoming more respected and integral to business objectives because we now have data that can back up our field of study and prove that our roles are demonstrably useful and necessary.
    • HotJar allows our small team of 3 UX designers to get research data as if we were a much larger team. Instead of painstakingly using our time to do guerrilla research, endless user observations, and other types of manual testing, we can now get a significant portion of our data from HotJar.
    • Using HotJar is actually giving our team a sense of excitement and enjoyment in our day-to-day usability work. Instead of seeing UX as a chore, HotJar is making data gathering and analyzing more fun, because we can see tangible results from a much larger pool of user/user-data than we could in the past.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots