Celonis vs. DISCO Ediscovery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Celonis
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Celonis is a Process Intelligence platform that helps companies improve their operations, customer experience, and sustainability. The company’s technology provides a digital twin of a company’s processes, giving everyone in the organization a common language and the ability to identify and capture value.N/A
DISCO Ediscovery
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
DISCO is a legal technology company that applies artificial intelligence and cloud computing to legal problems to help lawyers and legal teams improve outcomes for their clients. The vendor states corporate legal departments, law firms, and government agencies around the world use DISCO for ediscovery, case management, compliance, disputes, and investigations. In addition to its technology solutions, DISCO offers services to help legal teams manage ediscovery from anywhere at any…N/A
Pricing
CelonisDISCO Ediscovery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CelonisDISCO Ediscovery
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSnap is Celonis' free-to-use, cloud-based process mining solution, with over 3500 registrants and users. It includes most major features of Celonis, including all functionality found in common process mining tools. It also includes pre-built connectors to ServiceNow and pre-built content to get users started quickly on their process mining journey.DISCO’s all-inclusive flat-rate per-GB pricing is transparent and predictable, making it easy to accurately budget for any matter. Pricing automatically includes ingestion, processing, early case assessment, and production. In addition, DISCO does not charge for user licenses, meaning customers can add or remove user licenses based on the need of the case, not on the constraints of the budget. When it comes to managed review, DISCO guarantees every matter will come in on time and on budget.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CelonisDISCO Ediscovery
Considered Both Products
Celonis
Chose Celonis
Celonis was more focused on the process of discovery than SAP Signavio. Many interesting capabilities. High flexibility and scalability. Top performances E2E solution
Chose Celonis
I have extensively used the open source library Pm4py, which is a Python based library. However Celonis provides a much user friendly interface without the need to program everything from scratch. However, much of the analysis and even more flexible analysis is possible using …
Chose Celonis
Celonis provides transparency into the real end‑to‑end process, rather than how it is designed on paper.
Chose Celonis
I’ve taken a few courses on SAP SIGNAVIO, and it’s a much more standardised and simplified tool compared to Celonis. Firstly, in terms of the types of widgets you can install, although they are similar to those in Celonis, they don’t offer the same functionality or potential. …
Chose Celonis
We Chose Celonis over UiPath Process Mining because, Celonis is better in terms of functional and technical capabilities. Simillarly scalability, RCA capabilities and prebuilt connectors library is much better in Celonis compared to UiPath Process minning. UiPath remains great …
Chose Celonis
Celonis has multiple connectors.
More mature automated action engine for alerts and workflows.
Deeper insights and KPIs for performance metrics.
Chose Celonis
Celonis has a great mining and execution capabilities while Signavio simplifies you modelling efforts . Signavio enables collaboration

Celonis helps one to find and improve processes using system based data while identifying automation areas with good execution management
Chose Celonis
Celonis provides a very stable environment and ability to connect to multiple source systems. The Integration to the other applications, ability to perform the most recent trends in field of Process Mining, such as OCPM , to uncover and present closer to reality perspective of …
Chose Celonis
Celonis was the only solution that provided a track record of experience in Inventory Management, both out of the box and a success story.
Chose Celonis
More mature action flow automation, Real-time alerts for order delays, invoices at risk, etc. Deeper out-of-the-box ERP connectors (SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, ServiceNow).Real-time process improvemen
Chose Celonis
more sophisticated Process Mining Algorithms and far better user experience
Chose Celonis
Celonis results in a toolbox of several integrated capabilities that currently make it the market leader in process intelligence
Chose Celonis
Celonis wins in: - Platform performance - Customization (thanks to PQL in panels) - Data handling (transformations) - Academy and support
Chose Celonis
- Celonis is more flexible (in data management and dashboards)
- Celonis has more support material and better learning courses
Chose Celonis
Celonis is well presented and has a lot of resources for learn also autonomously how to set the platform at least for the main/principal functions. So it is quite easy to understand and to set up at the beginning.
Moreover it is a platform already adopted by several strategic …
Chose Celonis
Celonis is better in every sense of process mining
Chose Celonis
Data extraction possibilities were much more restrictive in Signavio in comparison to Celonis.
Not sure for the rest of the features but for us it was very important for the process mining tool to provide straightforward connectivity possibilities to multiple data sources.
Chose Celonis
Minit doesn’t provide the possibility to customize your own dashboards, so it’s not full filling the requirement. However I checked minit 2 years ago, maybe it improved in the mean while.
Chose Celonis
Celonis appears to be more complete and offer more functionalities for taking action after the analysis. Furthermore Celonis product seems to have a better and faster continuous improvement compared to competitors.
Chose Celonis
Microsoft Power BI, Power Apps and SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Chose Celonis
Celonis has way more ways for extracting data for way more systems and also it has the possibility to setup a live connection to the different systems. Also you can create different custom processes in Celonis that is not working for Signavio. The performance and usability of …
Chose Celonis
Celonis is a complete platform to analyze processes and manage automation. Qlik analytics platform is only a dashboarding tool.
DISCO Ediscovery
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I have had minimal interaction with Relativity.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I love DISCO university and all of the resources I can easily navigate to answer questions immediately or solve problems I encounter as I learn to use the program.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I found DISCO to be easier to use than ViewPoint and Relativity. However, my use of this platform was strictly reviewing and coding. I didn't do any productions or upload documents, so I cannot attest to the functionality of DISCO as compared to the other two.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
DISCO Ediscovery is easier to learn, more intuitive to use, and seems to give more consistent results. The interface is quite easy to use and gives a lot of information that aids in document review. The threading and family functions are extremely helpful
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
DISCO is affordable and easy to use for boutique firms.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
DISCO Ediscovery outperforms all the competitors we reviewed on ease of adoption, usability, UI design, support, functions, features, and feature updates. While the price was a bit higher, DISCO Ediscovery's value was far greater than that offered by the other products. DISCO …
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I believe Relativity had greater functionality for more advanced users, but it's more complicated nature caused more mistakes among users who lacked experience.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
Relativity. I found the interface of Relativity more intuitive. However, it is easier to manipulate documents on DISCO. Both could be improved by allowing you to mass download documents more easily.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
See other previous answers. Relativity is miles better but obviously more expensive
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I much prefer DISCO over Everlaw and Relativity
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
We've used Relativity, Xera, and a few others I'm forgetting. I strongly dislike Relativity when I have to use it now that I've been using DISCO Ediscovery.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
This is what I told the sales rep for Relativity and Lumix: "DISCO Ediscovery is much more user-friendly, faster, accurate, and… well, just everything else pales in comparison, is STILL an understatement – it was a collective decision and unanimous. We will stay with DISCO …
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
DISCO kills relativity in my mind. the speed, ease of use, modern and user-friendly interface, etc., etc. hands down. do not use relativity if you can use disco. i haven't used concordance in ages because it was terrible than so I can only assume it's still terrible.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
DISCO is more cost effective, easier to use and outperforms the other platforms. DISCO makes me look good. :)
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I used Relativity a long time ago and wasn't a fan. It was at the time very similar to Disco but you didn't have as much control and the interface wasn't as user-friendly.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
For the user, DISCO was more intuitive to use and navigate. It also seemed to load documents faster than some other platforms. However, it felt like the search and filtering capabilities were less advanced.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
DISCO Ediscovery leaves them all in the dust. We selected DISCO Ediscovery for a lot of reasons, ease of use being the primary one.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
Compared to the other document archive platforms our department has used in the past, DISCO Ediscovery provides greater search accuracy and organizational capabilities. The subscription price is slightly higher than the other competitors but the value DISCO Ediscovery …
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I have not yet used any other products by DISCO, outside of DISCO Ediscovery.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I did not choose DISCO, my organization did. But everyone has been happy with the choice.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
Relativity, Concur, etc.
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I prefer DISCO [Ediscovery] over Relativity. I think it is easier to use and produces better results.
Features
CelonisDISCO Ediscovery
Process Mining
Comparison of Process Mining features of Product A and Product B
Celonis
8.2
Ratings
5% below category average
DISCO Ediscovery
-
Ratings
Data Connection8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Discovery8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual Process Representation7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Variants8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Metrics8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Mining Algorithms8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Root Cause Investigation7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Optimization8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
What-if Analysis7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Compliance and Audit7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CelonisDISCO Ediscovery
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Appian
Appian
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Appian
Appian
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CelonisDISCO Ediscovery
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CelonisDISCO Ediscovery
Likelihood to Recommend
Celonis is helping [...] to gain greater transparency and control over complex business processes by connecting data across systems and revealing how work is actually executed. The platform supports proactive risk identification, value‑based process improvements, and more reliable delivery across the R&D value chain. With great support from the Celonis team in Copenhagen, we are enabling R&D teams to make data‑driven decisions, optimise performance, and continuously improve how [...] delivers value to patients.
Read full review
It's user-friendly and very intuitive. It has many capabilities that are out of the box, and it does not need to do any workaround. Also, there are many ways to do the same thing which is great when we are in a rush and how a user learns. Attorneys are loving the Case Builder function. I am happy that we can streamline processes and get to do more of what we love to do versus being bogged down by tedious steps.
Read full review
Pros
  • Clear understanding on how the processes really run
  • Excellent solution to support use cases like harmonization, process excellence, audit and compliance
  • High performing methodology to build economic value addressing inefficiencies
  • Perfect to convince clients showing objective evidences
  • Make easy the enterprise collaboration
  • Provide an E2E "movie" of the processes
  • Able to ensure a centric model to connect all the core processes
  • Top performances that save time of the analyst that can spend energy in his real work
  • Excellent ETL, agnostic (able to extrapolate data from many DB)
  • Strong capabilities of the data model
  • Continuous innovation
  • Solid platform to address projects of business process reengineering
Read full review
  • Search and locate
  • Document organization
  • Ease of use
  • Review Stages are used by our Experts with direct access, which eliminates the need to create folders on our servers, download to flash drives, or having to upload documents and create links in the cloud
Read full review
Cons
  • Helping reduce the complexity to support adoption throughout the business - received feedback that Celonis can only be used by Celonis SMEs, as the interface looks too complex
  • Can we go faster with less? Both from the Celonis side and NN side feels like if we involved less stakeholders we could achieve more
  • To get the most from Celonis we need to get the people who are closest to the process comfortable enough so they can draw insights from themselves - Celonis are good are drawing insights, but naturally sometimes misses the business context
Read full review
  • Need an easier way to track when a document did not receive coding review for all issues (i.e., when issues where added later on in the coding process--need to be alerted to go back and capture the additional issues to be coded).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been able to leverage Celonis [greatly] because of the commitment and support we receive from our data scientist. I strongly believe that we would not be able to accomplish this without her assistance. Moreover, when we escalate matters, the product development is engaged and commits resources to make sure our initiatives/business cases are supported.
Read full review
There were some customer service issues in closing a project, but generally the service has been helpful to our needs.
Read full review
Usability
It is a great tool but also requires a lot of work to get it into a useable fashion. Part of this is on our end as we don't have the dedicated analyst function yet to really become self-sufficient with Celonis. It also uncovers a lot of data issues or at the very least, multiple rounds of development and data validation are required before getting to a position where the business users feel comfortable with the data being reflected. This is fairly normal with any data-related development effort and perhaps not unique to Celonis.
Read full review
I've been able to go from never using this type of software before, to confidently using it on an everyday basis, and the learning curve was not steep at all.
Read full review
Support Rating
We submit tickets to Celonis through product support. No assistance is generally provided, have to wait and the ticket is then escalated to product support in Germany. Many times we submit the ticket and the support desk asks us the same questions back where they should already have this information.
Read full review
I've never had a problem with the support team getting back to me re my questions or assisting me in a project.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
DISCO provides good resources in addition to the walkthroughs.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Celonis has a lot of tools to support the implementation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The major reason to choose Celonis is that it has enhanced decision-making in filtering the candidates. The frontend designer has nice graphics and has well-designed self-service. I particularly enjoy the visual editor, which allows you to create complicated PQL without having to write any code, as well as the numerous filtering choices, including process mining options.
Read full review
DISCO Ediscovery outperforms all the competitors we reviewed on ease of adoption, usability, UI design, support, functions, features, and feature updates. While the price was a bit higher, DISCO Ediscovery's value was far greater than that offered by the other products. DISCO Ediscovery's functionality and accessibility was the best suited to our practice and the size of our firm and even the less tech savvy employees can learn how to use the application with some basic training.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The previous IFRS 9 calculation method was reaching its end of life—Celonis is a direct replacement for us.
  • When rebuilding our logic from the old system to the new, it gave us a much-needed opportunity to revamp and standardise company codes and, in some cases, even pick up some errors.
Read full review
  • DISCO has saved our clients tons of money in hosting fees, as well as hourly fees in time spent reviewing documents.
  • With DISCO's search capabilities, a review that could take weeks or months by many can be performed in days or weeks by fewer personnel.
  • With DISCO, actions that previously had to be contracted out to a vendor can now be handled in-house at a much cheaper cost.
Read full review
ScreenShots