Designed for high-volume, cross-channel campaigns, Cheetah Digital is used by marketers to deliver highly personalized, contextual communications across various channels including email, SMS, push, mobile wallet, direct mail, and social.
N/A
KeySurvey
Score5.6 out of 10
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pricing
Cheetah Digital
KeySurvey
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cheetah Digital
KeySurvey
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Cheetah Digital
KeySurvey
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Cheetah Digital and KeySurvey
Feature
Cheetah Digital
-
Ratings
KeySurvey
8.8
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Cheetah Digital and KeySurvey
Feature
Cheetah Digital
-
Ratings
KeySurvey
8.8
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Cheetah Digital and KeySurvey
Feature
Cheetah Digital
-
Ratings
KeySurvey
9.1
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Cheetah Digital and KeySurvey
Feature
Cheetah Digital
-
Ratings
KeySurvey
9.1
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Cheetah Digital and KeySurvey
Feature
Cheetah Digital
-
Ratings
KeySurvey
8.6
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Cheetah Digital and KeySurvey
I think CheetahMail, being one of the main ESPs in the market, is a quality choice. However, I would suggest that it's really only valuable for a bit larger of an organization, generally having staff of 100+ and revenues in tens of millions -- this is mainly to justify the amount of investment required, so may be cost-prohibitive to some. You also need to make sure that you understand the entire "level of support" you will gain through your specific contract.... the key is understanding what types of resources are within your organization (who's doing the coding? who comes up with the next campaign? What's the overall strategy?) Depending on these questions and resources, may help determine your final needs from a services point of view. CheetahMail can provide a wealth of various services specific to needs (and changes over time as your business changes), but a clear understanding of what you have before you bring them on will really help getting up and running quickly. Also be sure to truly understand the costs for the initial integrations, setups, IP senders, etc.
It's a convenient tool for questionnaires, surveys, and other reasons when you need to get people's feedback. We really enjoyed using this instrument, even though it can be a bit overwhelming at times. Also, it might take some time to create a survey if you have complicated business logic implemented, but that would take some time using any kind of instruments.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The organization of CheetahMail could at times be better, as you create more and more mailings, they just pile up in a long list. It would be useful to be able to create folders to store specific mailings in. (ex. editorial, newsletters, marketing, etc.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As I have begun exploring competitors, I've come to realize that every competitor offers so much more functionality and integration than CheetahMail does. When we first signed our contract, CheetahMail was much more innovative and at the forefront of email. Since being bought out by Experian, we've seen a huge decline in service and innovation. They have laid off much of their staff and moved their account representatives to Costa Rica. They also heavily rely on on third parties which you will have to pay large amounts of money for while other Email Service Providers have integrated new technologies into their platform. You will get more for your money going to a different email service such as Responsys, Silverpop, Listrak and the like,
CheetahMail has a high learning curve to master and requires a lot of backend work with tech teams to set up. Navigation is not the best and everything that should be automated is still extremely manual.
I've been very satisfied with the support given by Cheetah, they are always asking and looking for areas where they can help you improve upon your business. They are very knowledgeable and are able to quickly find any answer you are looking for.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had several moments when we needed the support (mostly it was when we were working on creating business logic for the survey and sometimes things didn't work as we expected them to). The KeySurvey support team was very friendly and helpful via chat and in case they couldn't solve the issue right at that moment, they always came back to us with a solution to our issue
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I believe Cheetah DMS is a bit more complete and a lot more complex to use than Mailchimp. Mailchimp was born as a mail marketing service while Cheetah has always worked across the whole online advertising spectrum making it a better solution for clients that need a certain level of service and sophistication.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
In terms of a business logic implementation, I think KeySurvey had the most extensive features. Granted, I haven't used a paid version of SurveyMonkey, but for our purposes, the customization KeySurvey offered us (implementing our corporate colors, fonts, and logos) was one of the best features and it looked professional. Also, the name "KeySurvey" kind of sounds better and more business-like for clients from enterprise companies.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Our efficiency has decreased with CheetaMail actually. Too many service calls to find out why something isn't working as expected, account setup questions, issues with PiP, takes too long to get a simple form built, customer service response time, etc...
Reporting is not very streamlined. This has caused us to take our reporting offline and use a method with better visibility.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info