Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Claris FileMaker
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Claris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.
$21
per month per user
Microsoft Access
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Access is a database management system from Microsoft that combines the relational Microsoft Jet Database Engine with a graphical user interface and software-development tools.
$139.99
per PC
SAP HANA Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
SAP HANA is an application that uses in-memory database technology to process very large amounts of real-time data from relational databases, both SAP and non-SAP, in a very short time. The in-memory computing engine allows HANA to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk which means that the data can be accessed in real time by the applications using HANA. The product is sold both as an appliance and as a cloud-based software solution.N/A
Pricing
Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessSAP HANA Cloud
Editions & Modules
Platform Subscription
$21
per month per user
Individual desktop license
$594
one-time fee
Microsoft Access
$139.99
per PC
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessSAP HANA Cloud
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsIncludes a one year free trial.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessSAP HANA Cloud
Considered Multiple Products
Claris FileMaker
Chose Claris FileMaker
The Claris FileMaker "toolbox" is more robust and comprehensive than any competitive product. The free or low-cost web apps often lead to a "dead-end" that is never the case with Claris FileMaker.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker looks more legit and not as likely to mess up formulas and such.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Access is very complex leading to longer deployment, more user training, and therefore higher costs. Caspio is decent but quite limited in its native ability.
Chose Claris FileMaker
I've used Microsoft Access, and it doesn't compare to Filemaker. The Filemaker software system is robust and had the ability to expand and work with other programs. I have a small business, and I can say that for a small to medium sized business, I do not think there is a …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Easy to get started and Includes starter solutions for every situation by Anyone with access can edit the program by using many plugins available to extend functionality such as Changing field/database/script names after the fact is free specially For the most part, drag and …
Chose Claris FileMaker
SmartSheets
Google Suite
Mendix
Chose Claris FileMaker
Claris just takes everything to the next level - there's nothing we've thrown at it that it can't do
Chose Claris FileMaker
FileMaker Pro is the chaotic, cumbersome and non-integratable little sibling of MS Access. And even MS Access can't be taken serious in a medium sized company. FileMaker Pro can not even be compared to serious products like OutSystems and Sitecore. It's also not free... whereas …
Chose Claris FileMaker
20 years ago we had to choose between Microsoft Access and Claris FileMaker Pro. We chose FileMaker Pro because it was easier to use. As our systems have evolved around FileMaker Pro we haven't looked at any competitors as we're too far along to start over again with a new …
Chose Claris FileMaker
The only other program I have used that has any type of similar functionality is ADP Workforce Now. I would prefer ADP Workforce Now overall because it is more user-friendly and can also accept tons of data, run reports, and more. However, FileMaker Pro has functionalities …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Quick Base is internet-based and easily programmable by the end-user. Because of that, it is not as customizable as FileMaker. We had very specific purposes that were more easily accomplished in FileMaker (eg. Auto-calculating fields were more fool proof-ly accomplished in …
Chose Claris FileMaker
We previously had deployed QuickBase. However, we realized that QuickBase would not allow us to construct our app the way we worked. That is where FMP came in. Its ability to adapt to the way we work made transitioning very easy.
Chose Claris FileMaker
I haven't used another product like FileMaker Pro. Previously (at other jobs), I would email my needs to our maintenance and catering staff.
Chose Claris FileMaker
We've been working with Filemaker Pro since I started here so I didn't have much a choice, but based on my past experience dealing with custom databases, it's the easiest, most user-friendly program I've ever worked on. It provides exactly what you need, when you need it, in …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Unlike traditional databases, you get an all inclusive solution which allows end-user screens and workflows which can be developed via scripting. With the exception of SQL Server, Filemaker also allows you to setup scheduled scripts which can run on a recurring basis. In …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Zoho Sales, CRM etc as well as Salesforce.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Since we had implemented FileMaker Pro early on with the company, I have not used any other database software on a regular basis. Some others have used Zoho Creator with success, but since the cross-platform and program functionality of FileMaker is well established we have …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I am now using WorkEtc for my CRM, and there are more benefits to me and my business using this software than using FileMaker Pro.
WORK Etc Benefits: CloudBase, App, Email Response Update Project Automatically, Invoicing, Reports, Tags, Some quick add features
Work Etc. Cons: …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I chose FileMaker over a custom DB with Azure and SQL Server because of the low code nature of FileMaker. And we needed ease of access with Apple products so we didn't use Microsoft Access.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Some developers really like Visual FoxPro - but it has been discontinued by Microsoft and is no longer supported.

FileMaker offers improved developer productivity.
Chose Claris FileMaker
We were already using FileMaker. When we get to the point of needing to scale or rebuild, we are likely to move to AWS but keep FileMaker for prototyping.
Chose Claris FileMaker
The most direct competitor to FileMaker Pro is Microsoft Access. If you understand the way Microsoft Access works, then you can probably get more functionality and features in Microsoft Access. With that said though, FileMaker is much easier to learn and develop in. I tried …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I find now that I can't use Excel. It drives me nuts. For me it is now just a method for importing data and a method for exporting data that Excel users want to see.
Microsoft Access
Chose Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access is used independently of Microsoft's Office suite (also in use) at our company - the usual applications: Word, Excel, Outlook, etc. and does not really overlap. Microsoft Access was selected as a simple, functional inventory database based on ease of data …
Chose Microsoft Access
Microsoft excel is great but for much smaller data organization. Microsoft Access is more functional for larger more robust projects.
Chose Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access is great integration with Microsoft Word templates such as reports and name tags.
Chose Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access is a superb software in database management system. I have been using it for many years without any hesitations. The software is making it different from other software with its awesome features. The software is cost effective for the organisation. It also …
Chose Microsoft Access
Excel is a fantastic - robust application that can do so much so easily. Its easy to train and understand. However - excel does not provide a reporting function and that is typically where we will suggest a move to [Microsoft] Access. [Microsoft] Access requires a little more …
Chose Microsoft Access

With [Microsoft] Access I am able to quickly create simple database driven solutions with built in UI and reporting in one tool. Advanced coding is not necessary and the tool guides you through building out. Opponents for a robust, end-to/end product.

Chose Microsoft Access
Having used Snowflake, I can definitely say that both of these tools are very easy to use and value for money. Although for me, the aspects where Microsoft Access stacks up are its low cost and usability. Snowflake is good with its cloud-based system but for startups where the …
Chose Microsoft Access
I haven't really used another database product other than Microsoft Access since the mid-90s. I don't even remember which program I did use, but needless to say, it did not have as much functionality nor was it as user friendly as databases today. So I really can't say how …
Chose Microsoft Access
Crystal is easier for report writing, but isn't a database solution. Salesforce is lovely, but much more expensive than an old copy of Microsoft Office. For a small budget, [Microsoft] Access was really the only viable option. I only wish it was easier to write complex reports.
Chose Microsoft Access
[Selected Microsoft Access for] employee learning simplicity, attractive graphical environment and features of Microsoft 365 with responsive Microsoft support.
Chose Microsoft Access
Visual FoxPro is a discontinued software, and no longer has support. Also, very few people still use it, or ever know how to use it. Excel is very popular, but [Microsoft] Access can do things like data joins much easier and faster
Chose Microsoft Access
Although SQL is a full-blown platform for heavy database management, Microsoft Access serves the purpose perfectly for small and mid-scale enterprises. It is also perfect for people just getting started with database management. The graphical user interface is a major plus …
Chose Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access is better for large files and backlogs than Excel because it can handle the workload. Excel is great as well, but filtering and searching is limited, and it can crash rather easily. You don't see those problems with Access.
Chose Microsoft Access
We've actually started to use both of these programs. There are pros and cons to both.
Microsoft Access is best for linking two sets of data that already have a common shared field (i.e. both sets of data include a student ID number, social security number, etc)
Airtable is best …
Chose Microsoft Access
  • Microsoft Access is great for local low code, relational database applications where users are creating, reading, updating, and deleting data (CRUD)..
  • Useful mostly for locally stored database and not network or cloud-based applications
  • Easy-to-user interface makes it hard to …
Chose Microsoft Access
SharePoint is good for simple data structures, use of workflow, integration with AD, etc. But SharePoint does not support fully relational data or complex reporting, whereas Access absolutely does.
Chose Microsoft Access
Being a similar "Windows application" it's easier to start to use as part of Office. Also, the GUI capabilities are much more advanced than other high-performance databases.
Chose Microsoft Access
Unlike enterprise-level databases, MS Access doesn't require setting up a complex server environment with user security schemes. It's an excellent tool for small scale databases where purchasing and setting up a product like MS SQL Server could be an overkill. Unlike …
Chose Microsoft Access
Tableau is not even a 'switch-out' tool, it's for visualization so it's not a fair comparison. Against other databasing tools, MySQL is still my favorite may be simply due to being a creature of comfort because that's where I first learned to manage DB. However, Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft Access
MS SQL is a more powerful tool but I love the reporting feature in MS Access. MS Excel is useful for complex calculations but to me, MS Access helps me organize that data. InfoPath is similar to MS Access in that you can create forms for data entry, but it does not include …
SAP HANA Cloud
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
As our organization was already using various SAP applications we choose SAP HANA Cloud. It was easier to integrate various SAP applications in SAP HANA Cloud than IBM Cloud Databases.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
A standard Laboratory information systems, QEdge and Trackwise all are functional application. They are brilliant in providing information and data in real time, where SAP HANA Cloud is a data platform,which seats beneath the data managing system and helps for QA oversight for …
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Faster implementation and easy to use. When we compare to other ERPs in the market. It provides unified processing of transactional data and better memory processing. Compared to other platforms, it better supports the AI area. It also has a strong infrastructure to support …
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud is a leading Database-as-a-Service solution which offers more advanced features than IBM Cloud databases
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Webonise Olympus Platform, DataWalk and AFrame
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
SAP Fieldglass and SAP Concur
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
In my experience, SAP HANA Cloud has an easy setup
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud was overall much better for professional service
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud offers high-performance analytical capabilities than IBM Cloud databases. It also offers smooth SAP applications integration.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
We choose SAP HANA Cloud because it offers high-performance in-memory database which provides faster data processing and real time analytics.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
We choose SAP HANA Cloud over IBM Cloud Database because we are more familiar with SAP products. It also provides many advanced features than IBM Cloud Databases
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
The reason for the selection was that, after reviewing several, it is the one with the best recommendations in the market.

el tema de la seleccion fue por que despues de que se revisaorn varios es el que tiene mejores recomendaciones en el marcado
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
They are both easy to work with.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
They are best-in-class as a SAP product for integrating with SAP & non-SAP applications. A clean core approach makes the Application more stable.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Much more integrated with other SAP offerings and very powerful response. Less focused on pro-code scenarios, e.g., using notebooks. Extreme workloads can become expensive and more difficult to scale than the dedicated tools that separate the compute completely from the …
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Evaluated for its separation of compute and storage and lower entry cost, but it lacked the native understanding of complex SAP ERP semantics (ABAP logic) without extensive data reconstruction
Features
Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessSAP HANA Cloud
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP HANA Cloud
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces4.10 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security9.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability8.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Relational Databases
Comparison of Relational Databases features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Microsoft Access
7.7
Ratings
5% below category average
SAP HANA Cloud
8.6
Ratings
7% above category average
ACID compliance00 Ratings7.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings8.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Database locking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings7.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Disaster recovery00 Ratings7.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings8.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Multiple datatypes00 Ratings8.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessSAP HANA Cloud
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 6.0 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 6.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessSAP HANA Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessSAP HANA Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
I think FileMaker [Pro] is a great solution for a small business wanting to take the next step from managing data with Excel spreadsheets to actually using a database. It is very intuitive to use and manage. A tech-savvy user can learn to use FileMaker [Pro] very easily without advanced skills as a developer.
Read full review
Microsoft Access can be easily implemented with training. It doesn't require expert level skill for basic reporting functions - but can be scaled to a complex database with sophisticated users. Its appropriate to consider if excel needs to be used to create reports, or if there are data entry needs - with corresponding reports.
Read full review
I think if you have a large organization, it's probably the product and the marketplace to go to. We're a large management consulting firm operating in four to seven countries. And generally speaking, I think that's the size and the scope where it scales best. I can't speak to smaller companies, but I can't see smaller companies leveraging the benefits as much as a larger organization can.
Read full review
Pros
  • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
  • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
  • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
  • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
Read full review
  • Generates information about department events, services, orders, etc. quickly and in report form.
  • Easy to design forms and reports with drag and drop components. You don't need to know coding.
  • The ability to link tables and queries to get all the info needed for forms and reports
  • Forms and reports are easy to customize and edit.
  • Easily report your data grouped and sorted by any field
Read full review
  • SAP HANA Cloud can help drive data analytics, data migration, and data management exceptionally well.
  • It offers an integration service that lets you integrate data and processes with 3rd party app or any other cloud app.
  • In-memory capability helps in faster data processing.
Read full review
Cons
  • I had some big complaints about how to edit calculations and scripts, and not being able to print/export PDF from server but with the last 2 versions I can't complain any more. Those got added.
  • Syncing records between iOS and Filemaker Server still requires a developer to accomplish. Although I make money doing it for others I wish there was some "central" method of syncing that everyone can follow.
Read full review
  • Generally high learning curve for new users. Especially if they are not comfortable with technology.
  • Desktop only program; not available in web-format like other O365 products
  • Fewer experienced users, means it's a lot of self-teaching and troubleshooting when you run into an issue
Read full review
  • Requires higher processing power, otherwise it won't fly. How ever computing costs are lower. Incase you are migrating to cloud please do not select the highest config available in that series . Upgrading it later against a reserved instance can cost you dearly with a series change
  • Lack of clarity on licensing is one major challenge
  • Unless S/4 with additional features are enabled mere migration HANA DB is not a rewarding journey. Power is in S/4
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
Read full review
I and the rest of my team will renew our Microsoft Access in the future because we use and maintain many different applications and databases created using Microsoft Access so we will need to maintain them in the future. Additionally, it is a standard at our place of work so it is at $0 cost to us to use. Another reason for renewing Microsoft Access is that we just don' t have the resources needed to extend into a network of users so we need to remain a single-desktop application at this time.
Read full review
At this moment we are not focusing on SAP, however would love to in the future. This is primarily because of our limited ability to generate more revenue to fund for SAP partnerships and products. Our initial tryst with SAP Partneredge open ecosystem didn't go as planned and we have shelved that for now. Hope we can revive in the future
Read full review
Usability
It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
Read full review
Microsoft Access is easy to use. It is compatible with spreadsheets. It is a very good data management tool. There is scope to save a large amount of data in one place. For using this database, one does not need much training, can be shared among multiple users. This database has to sort and filtering features which seem to be very useful.
Read full review
It is very useful solution which provides you speedier data processing, real-time analytics. It helps you manage diverse data types. It also offers you excellent disaster management. It has user friendly interface which helps you navigate system and transactions easily and perform task smoothly.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
Read full review
I don't think the program has ever failed me. It is one of those programs where there is always a solution if you know where to look.
Read full review
so far, we didn't get any outage
Read full review
Performance
for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
Read full review
No answers on this topic
so far good
Read full review
Support Rating
The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
Read full review
While I have never contacted Microsoft directly for product support, for some reason there's a real prejudice against MS Access among most IT support professionals. They are usually discouraging when it comes to using MS Access. Most of this is due to their lack of understanding of MS Access and how it can improve one's productivity. If Microsoft invested more resources towards enhancing and promoting the use of MS Access then maybe things would be different.
Read full review
One specific example of how the support for SAP HANA Cloud impacted us is in our efforts to troubleshoot and resolve technical issues. Whenever we encountered an issue or had a question, the support team was quick to respond and provided us with clear and actionable guidance. This helped us avoid downtime and keep our analytics operations running smoothly.
Read full review
In-Person Training
easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
Read full review
there is no key idea, since it is easy to implement Microsoft Access
Read full review
Professional GIS people are some of the most risk-averse there are, and it's difficult to get them to move to HANA in one step. Start with small projects building to 80% use of HANA spatial over time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
FileMaker Pro is the chaotic, cumbersome and non-integratable little sibling of MS Access. And even MS Access can't be taken serious in a medium sized company. FileMaker Pro can not even be compared to serious products like OutSystems and Sitecore. It's also not free... whereas at least MS Access can be used free, even if your company is (really) small.
Read full review
Microsoft Access is used independently of Microsoft's Office suite (also in use) at our company - the usual applications: Word, Excel, Outlook, etc. and does not really overlap. Microsoft Access was selected as a simple, functional inventory database based on ease of data entry, search functionality and avoiding the need for a separate ERP module.
Read full review
It enables preview and better cloud service than other cloud platforms. Easy document transfer and faster document transfer are the key points for the selection of the HANA cloud server. The preview of data before its execution is also one of the factors in the selection of the HANA server.
Read full review
Scalability
it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Limitation of training deliverable by organization
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact for my company is that we have designed a solution that meets the needs of our very custom processes.
  • My company is in the process of expanding rapidly and with that the need for new tools are need quickly. With most languages (like Java or .Net), it could take weeks to develop the same tool it takes us 3 days to make in Filemaker.
  • The most negative impact however is that at times Filemaker will just become overwhelmed and we have no choice but to restart the server which hosts the application.
Read full review
  • Microsoft Access is very low in cost as compared to its competitors and provides value for money spent.
  • Comes with Office Suite for your whole organization. Easy to install and use.
  • Many people had to shift to Windows in order to use those as there is no Mac version.
Read full review
  • Enhanced agility and innovation, improved decision-making, and reduced IT infrastructure costs are some positive impacts.
  • The process of migrating data and applications to the cloud may require downtime and disrupt operations.
  • It involves implementing additional security controls and addressing data residency requirements, which can have a negative impact.
Read full review
ScreenShots