Conga Composer vs. Qwilr
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Conga Composer | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | Conga Composer is a document generation and automation tool designed to simplify and streamline the process of creating and distributing customized documents, presentations, and reports. | $30 per month per user |
Qwilr | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Qwilr is designed to change the way a business creates and shares documents on the web. This solution allows businesses to turn traditional documents into powerful and interactive webpages that look great on any device. The vendor says this in turn offers businesses access to analytics and other helpful tools when sharing quotes, proposals and presentations with clients. | $39 per month |
| Conga Composer | Qwilr | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Qwilr is a freemium product. Users upgrade to the Business or Enterprise plans for access to premium features, like advanced analytics, security and branding controls, get sales material accepted, e-signed and collect payments via Stripe. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Conga Composer | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
91% Would buy again 128 Answers | 86% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
94% Delivers good value for the price 112 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 127 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
93% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 80 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
90% Implementation went as expected 95 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Conga Composer | Qwilr | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal Creation & Organization |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Proposal Collaboration & Workflow |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Proposal Delivery |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Conga Composer | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Formstack for Salesforce Score7.1 out of 10 | Proposify Score7.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Formstack for Salesforce Score7.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Formstack for Salesforce Score7.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Conga Composer | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Usability | 7.5 | 9.0 |
| Availability | 3.6 | - |
| Performance | 3.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.9 | 9.4 |
| Implementation Rating | 3.7 | - |
| Configurability | 1.8 | - |
| Ease of integration | 2.7 | - |
| Product Scalability | 3.6 | - |
| Professional Services | 2.7 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 1.8 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 3.3 | - |
| Conga Composer | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Professional Services |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Conga Composer Screenshots | Qwilr Screenshots |
















