Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CyberArk Workforce Identity
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
CyberArk Identity is a SaaS-delivered suite of solutions designed to simplify identity and access management in enterprises. CyberArk Identity unifies Workforce Access and Identity Management solutions in a single offering. Workforce Access capabilities include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, session security, and credential management. Identity Management capabilities include lifecycle management, identity orchestration, and identity governance. With CyberArk Identity,…N/A
Okta
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Okta is an enterprise grade identity management service, built in the cloud. IT can manage access across any application, person or device. Whether the people are employees, partners or customers or whether the applications are in the cloud, on premises or on a mobile device, Okta helps IT become more secure and maintain compliance. The Okta service provides directory services, single sign-on, authentication, provisioning, workflow, and built in reporting. ment systems.
$2
Per User Per Month
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
GlobalProtect™ delivers the protection of next-generation security platform to the mobile workforce in order to stop targeted cyberattacks, evasive application traffic, phishing, malicious websites, command-and-control traffic, and known and unknown threats.N/A
Pricing
CyberArk Workforce IdentityOktaPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Single Sign on
$2.00
Per User Per Month
Multi Factor Authentication
$3.00
Per User Per Month
Single Sign on Adaptive
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Multi Factor Authentication Adaptive
$6.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CyberArk Workforce IdentityOktaPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Free Trial
YesYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CyberArk Workforce IdentityOktaPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Considered Multiple Products
CyberArk Workforce Identity
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
OneLogin and Okta provide similar experiences, but OneLogin is less mature than Centrify. Their Mac and Windows management suites are still in a beta phase are cannot be deployed en masse to our user base. Okta is more expensive and does not have the security compliance. …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We started off using ADFS from Microsoft, which took most of a day to get fully functional and nearly a week to get fully optimized. The documentation was inconsistent with ADFS and there was no real support without opening a Microsoft Premier Support ticket. At the time, if …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We reviewed Okta and OneLogin while looking at Centrify for our ticketing solution SSO partner. When doing so we looked at it from the aspect of if we wanted to roll this out where we could see the use cases for it and initially it would be in a couple departments then branch …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify offered us more for our money by being more than just an SSO platform. There were several other features included such as MDM and MFA. This started other initiatives for us and felt the other solutions we evaluated would not have been able to provide.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify provided both SSO support as well as Mac support; we needed both. Other products had one or the other, but not both.

This made choosing Centrify a no-brainer as we didn't have to have a wide variety of integrations to do and vendors to manage.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
I think they are quite similar and don't have enough knowledge about one over another.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Seemed to be the best in breed and the one with deeper Mac integration on the short roadmap. As an Apple Distinguished School, this is obviously very critical to us. Very easy to set up and it has a deep pre-canned application pool for already deployed apps. Very easy for …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity

During our evaluation process, Centrify could show in the PoC that they are very flexible and open minded to our ideas. An application integration which was not part of the product catalog has been integrated for free. Furthermore the whole package compared to the …

Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify's pricing was much better than their competitors. They also offered a better sign-in/multi-factor experience for our users when doing pilot testing. Their product also included other features like Mobile Device Management that was a nice add-on.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify offers many more features and much better control.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
To be honest, all four products were fairly similar in much of the architecture and functionality. We found that Centrify offered a bit more in terms of user acceptance, ease of administration, reporting and MDM capabilities.
Okta
Chose Okta
Okta is more easier to handle than CyberArk. The webpage is more understandable.
Chose Okta
Okta single sign-on provided better functionality with a higher variety of directory integration that was important for our particular organization with multiple user directories being accessed by various departments.
Cost was another factor for our selection as some other …
Chose Okta
Okta has more robust support for Office 365 than Centrify (which we previously used), and it is easier to configure and administrate. It is cloud-based and easier to manage than Microsoft ADFS. It is similar to OneLogin and Ping but we've found the pricing and support options …
Chose Okta
I selected Okta for its robustness of product as well as the clear record of security breaches, which some of its competitors do not have. Ease of use and reliability of the product are things that are unmatched by its competitors.
Chose Okta
Centrify solves several problems in our organization. First, it helps improve our security by creating a secure, easy to use user authentication service across applications that would have previously required separate login credentials. RSA- In a corporate setting I feel this …
Chose Okta
We had an investment in Okta already, but we did look at Centrify. While Centrify is nice and capable, there wasn't enough reason to change solutions.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access

No answer on this topic

Features
CyberArk Workforce IdentityOktaPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
CyberArk Workforce Identity
9.0
3 Ratings
9% above category average
Okta
8.8
156 Ratings
7% above category average
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control9.03 Ratings9.2144 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.02 Ratings9.2155 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.02 Ratings9.0151 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management9.02 Ratings8.0144 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning9.03 Ratings8.8130 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation9.03 Ratings8.5122 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management9.03 Ratings8.6115 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CyberArk Workforce IdentityOktaPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.7 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.7 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.7 out of 10
Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CyberArk Workforce IdentityOktaPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(43 ratings)
8.8
(183 ratings)
10.0
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(18 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(4 ratings)
10.0
(12 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CyberArk Workforce IdentityOktaPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Likelihood to Recommend
Cyberark
Centrify is a great solution for anyone looking to start using Office 365. It is also a great solution for anyone wanting to provide their users with an SSO solution using OAUTH, Federation, or SAML for any hosted service. If you are looking to use Centrify for MDM but you aren't using a hosted/hybrid email solution such as Office 365, there are better on-premise options that should be explored.
Read full review
Okta
The cloud-first medium through large enterprises which use multiple technology systems should choose Okta as their best solution because it provides optimal performance. Okta's main advantage exists in its extensive Integration Network, which enables IT departments to implement SSO together with automated lifecycle management across multiple third-party SaaS applications such as Slack and Salesforce and AWS. For fast-growing companies that need to deploy systems quickly while providing users with platform-independent access, this solution serves as their perfect "identity glue."

Okta licensing to small businesses with basic access needs which require access to three applications should use a different product because their low-cost requirements will exceed their expected benefits from the product. The Okta Access Gateway creates operational difficulties for businesses that depend on legacy systems or have extensive "on-premise only" network requirements
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
I still think Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access is the best SASE/SSE product out there. It just has such good granular controls and up to date security definitions that you can feel absolutely secure in your purchase. GlobalProtect was a lifesaver for me when COVID hit so yes I had to work my butt off to get it up and running quickly and as secure as I possibly could but it worked amazing and had excellent performance after we got it running and tied to MFA, certificates and security policies.
Read full review
Pros
Cyberark
  • User provisioning is accurate, effective, and fully customizable.
  • Custom configuration of applications for SSO and provisioning is easy using fully customizable scripts to address your exact need.
  • The user interface is clean and easy to navigate.
  • Support is helpful and prompt.
Read full review
Okta
  • Centralized control of enterprise passwords
  • Extensive customization of acceptable password criteria
  • One system for Identity and Access Management to learn
  • Scalable throughout the university for all central services
  • Uniform login experience for students, faculty, and staff
  • Single point of response to address termination of access
  • Ability to use FastPass for lower priority systems
  • Excellent support of multi-factor requirements
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • A secure end-to-end network with virtualization to be able to choose the port of our interest and an opening of the same.
  • Monthly updates that are sufficient, automatic updates that allow us not to have to do the manual implementation.
  • Prisma allows automatically opens an IPsec/SSL VPN connection to Prisma Access.
  • Is flexible and scalable
Read full review
Cons
Cyberark
  • Occasionally, I get logged out of Gmail, sometimes in the middle of an email. I'm not sure why it happens, but I think it has something to do with timing out. Which is strange because I'm on email all day. Not sure why.
Read full review
Okta
  • I do have to reset my password quite frequently. However, I don't think there is really a way to improve this, as it's a good security measure.
  • It makes me re-sign in a couple of times a day, sometimes if I haven't used my laptop for a couple of hours, and sometimes just randomly throughout the day.
  • It doesn't remember my devices, either my laptop or phone. so it always calls that out.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • With all of it's unique features it does take some time to get folks up to speed in regards to supporting/managing the software.
  • Doesn't always play nice with non Palo Alto software.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cyberark
Centrify is central to creating efficiency and safety for our clients and internally. To remove it would cause a massive disturbance in the lives of our employees and our clients.
Read full review
Okta
Okta has a passion to provide secure and scalable identity solution. Their passion has come across as advocacy in a way that has deepened my knowledge of the field of authentication. I took identity for granted before but after seeing features such as external authentication I know that Okta can enable my business to reach new heights
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
Okta
Some of its features are great and some are slightly complex and not easy without vendor support.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
I still say that Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access is the best. I love their GUI, their policies are easy to manage, the sales team is VERY helpful (especially when support is not). I still recommend them to everyone I talk to.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
Okta
The Okta Identity Cloud advertises 4 9's of reliability and I would go as far to say that it may even do better than that. As a true Global organization that operates in just about every region of the world, we have yet to have an issue with The Okta Identity Cloud that has impacted our business operations.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Performance
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
Okta
From my perspective, for the things that my group uses it for, Okta is very fast. It is as least as fast as the local password database methods that it replaces on our campus enterprise services. I do not believe that it slows anything down at all. In fact, not having to think too much about the login, because they all look the same, probably speeds things up somewhat.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cyberark
The support staff thus far has been very helpful. At times I feel they are driving the process forward without my intervention or constant reminder, which is nice to have in a company for a change. Most support seems to be a hassle but so far Centrify appears to treat your project as their own project.
Read full review
Okta
We've had a few support cases over the years and every case has been handled by the Okta support team beautifully. We received clear answers to questions we had regarding setup and even were provided simple to follow guides on how to setup their product to use with custom applications.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cyberark
Centrify offered us more for our money by being more than just an SSO platform. There were several other features included such as MDM and MFA. This started other initiatives for us and felt the other solutions we evaluated would not have been able to provide.
Read full review
Okta
Okta is far superior in terms of integrations, user interface, automation, and connectivity. Additionally, Okta offers better support and availability, and a more robust solution across every capacity Entra competes in. Okta simply works, whereas Microsoft Entra has a large overhead that is difficult to use when configuring things.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
The McAfee product really isn’t a great option. The configuration is a nightmare and requires a lot of time. The policy management has a high learning curve.
Read full review
Scalability
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
Okta
Being a cloud native application, The Okta Identity Cloud is extremely scalable and easy to setup. By integrating into existing directories and applications via standard techniques and protocols, it is very easy to both initially setup and add additional users as required. Once all the necessary integrations are setup, it's a simple rinse and repeat process to onboard additional users (which can be automated with imports as well)
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cyberark
  • CyberArk Workforce Identity provides secure access to on-premises and cloud applications. The platform is highly scalable and works well for companies of any size.
  • I can classify and label data. Also keep track of activity in shared applications and data, to know exactly who accesses each of the files.
Read full review
Okta
  • Generally saves 1 hour for the various teams, effectively logging in to every application as Okta provides SSO.
  • Password management is easier and owned by the user with multiple timely reminders.
  • Saved time due to role-wise access creation with only limited application to various team members.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • It is extremely easy to manage who has remote access in our organization now.
  • It has allowed us to more fluidly get remote workers up and running.
  • Another tool to mange is never a good thing and the Panorama UI could use a little work.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CyberArk Workforce Identity Screenshots

Screenshot of Admin PortalScreenshot of Identity LoginScreenshot of SWS PortalScreenshot of UBA PortalScreenshot of User Portal